Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Utah

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Cleaning & Maintenance
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Utah
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Utah

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Utah Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Utah

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Randlett 100.0% 3.2% (+96.8)#1 3.5% (+96.5)#14
2. Sundance 50.0% 3.2% (+46.8)#2 3.5% (+46.5)#85
3. Echo 48.7% 3.2% (+45.5)#3 3.5% (+45.2)#95
4. Alta 46.2% 3.2% (+43.0)#4 3.5% (+42.7)#104
5. White Mesa 34.6% 3.2% (+31.4)#5 3.5% (+31.1)#191
6. Halchita 24.7% 3.2% (+21.5)#6 3.5% (+21.2)#404
7. Aneth 23.5% 3.2% (+20.3)#7 3.5% (+20.0)#447
8. Oljato Monument Valley 22.8% 3.2% (+19.7)#8 3.5% (+19.4)#478
9. Manila 21.3% 3.2% (+18.1)#9 3.5% (+17.8)#555
10. Green River 20.4% 3.2% (+17.2)#10 3.5% (+16.9)#612
11. Escalante 18.4% 3.2% (+15.2)#11 3.5% (+14.9)#738
12. Centerfield 17.2% 3.2% (+14.0)#12 3.5% (+13.7)#852
13. Hatch 16.7% 3.2% (+13.5)#13 3.5% (+13.2)#906
14. Rockville 16.2% 3.2% (+13.0)#14 3.5% (+12.7)#970
15. Torrey 15.1% 3.2% (+11.9)#15 3.5% (+11.6)#1,090
16. Moab 14.6% 3.2% (+11.4)#16 3.5% (+11.1)#1,181
17. Henrieville 14.5% 3.2% (+11.3)#17 3.5% (+11.0)#1,213
18. Leamington 14.3% 3.2% (+11.1)#18 3.5% (+10.8)#1,236
19. Boulder 14.2% 3.2% (+11.0)#19 3.5% (+10.7)#1,267
20. Jensen 13.6% 3.2% (+10.4)#20 3.5% (+10.1)#1,386
21. Delta 11.5% 3.2% (+8.36)#21 3.5% (+8.06)#1,988
22. Oakley 11.4% 3.2% (+8.22)#22 3.5% (+7.92)#2,047
23. Ballard 11.3% 3.2% (+8.07)#23 3.5% (+7.77)#2,111
24. Coalville 11.1% 3.2% (+7.89)#24 3.5% (+7.59)#2,185
25. Wanship 10.9% 3.2% (+7.75)#25 3.5% (+7.45)#2,231
26. Daniel 10.9% 3.2% (+7.72)#26 3.5% (+7.42)#2,248
27. Emery 10.9% 3.2% (+7.67)#27 3.5% (+7.37)#2,260
28. Eureka 10.8% 3.2% (+7.59)#28 3.5% (+7.29)#2,294
29. Hinckley 10.4% 3.2% (+7.22)#29 3.5% (+6.92)#2,451
30. Kingston 10.3% 3.2% (+7.10)#30 3.5% (+6.80)#2,490
31. Garden City 9.4% 3.2% (+6.25)#31 3.5% (+5.95)#2,925
32. Paragonah 9.3% 3.2% (+6.13)#32 3.5% (+5.83)#2,991
33. West Wood 9.1% 3.2% (+5.95)#33 3.5% (+5.65)#3,079
34. Flaming Gorge 9.1% 3.2% (+5.91)#34 3.5% (+5.61)#3,118
35. Kamas 9.1% 3.2% (+5.87)#35 3.5% (+5.57)#3,145
36. Silver Summit 9.0% 3.2% (+5.81)#36 3.5% (+5.51)#3,179
37. Navajo Mountain 8.6% 3.2% (+5.46)#37 3.5% (+5.16)#3,449
38. Huntington 8.6% 3.2% (+5.37)#38 3.5% (+5.07)#3,504
39. Holden 8.3% 3.2% (+5.15)#39 3.5% (+4.85)#3,656
40. Goshen 8.2% 3.2% (+4.98)#40 3.5% (+4.69)#3,820
41. Bicknell 7.9% 3.2% (+4.77)#41 3.5% (+4.47)#4,003
42. Hideout 7.9% 3.2% (+4.75)#42 3.5% (+4.45)#4,023
43. Castle Dale 7.9% 3.2% (+4.71)#43 3.5% (+4.41)#4,056
44. Glendale 7.9% 3.2% (+4.71)#44 3.5% (+4.41)#4,060
45. Clawson 7.7% 3.2% (+4.51)#45 3.5% (+4.21)#4,252
46. Montezuma Creek 7.5% 3.2% (+4.28)#46 3.5% (+3.98)#4,450
47. Ferron 7.4% 3.2% (+4.26)#47 3.5% (+3.96)#4,479
48. Junction 7.4% 3.2% (+4.22)#48 3.5% (+3.92)#4,506
49. Rocky Ridge 7.4% 3.2% (+4.20)#49 3.5% (+3.90)#4,542
50. Carbonville 7.0% 3.2% (+3.86)#50 3.5% (+3.56)#4,879
51. Marysvale 6.9% 3.2% (+3.75)#51 3.5% (+3.45)#5,011
52. Fairview 6.9% 3.2% (+3.71)#52 3.5% (+3.41)#5,043
53. Wellsville 6.8% 3.2% (+3.57)#53 3.5% (+3.27)#5,252
54. Fountain Green 6.4% 3.2% (+3.21)#54 3.5% (+2.91)#5,744
55. Henefer 6.3% 3.2% (+3.17)#55 3.5% (+2.87)#5,805
56. Honeyville 6.3% 3.2% (+3.15)#56 3.5% (+2.85)#5,838
57. Wendover 6.3% 3.2% (+3.14)#57 3.5% (+2.84)#5,843
58. Wales 6.2% 3.2% (+3.07)#58 3.5% (+2.77)#5,964
59. Enoch 6.1% 3.2% (+2.96)#59 3.5% (+2.66)#6,155
60. Kearns 6.1% 3.2% (+2.88)#60 3.5% (+2.58)#6,282
61. Marion 5.8% 3.2% (+2.65)#61 3.5% (+2.35)#6,632
62. Fielding 5.8% 3.2% (+2.63)#62 3.5% (+2.33)#6,660
63. Levan 5.8% 3.2% (+2.62)#63 3.5% (+2.32)#6,676
64. Manti 5.6% 3.2% (+2.42)#64 3.5% (+2.12)#7,041
65. Annabella 5.5% 3.2% (+2.36)#65 3.5% (+2.06)#7,142
66. Plymouth 5.5% 3.2% (+2.34)#66 3.5% (+2.04)#7,163
67. Hurricane 5.5% 3.2% (+2.33)#67 3.5% (+2.03)#7,181
68. Ephraim 5.4% 3.2% (+2.20)#68 3.5% (+1.90)#7,431
69. Mantua 5.4% 3.2% (+2.20)#69 3.5% (+1.90)#7,432
70. Orderville 5.3% 3.2% (+2.12)#70 3.5% (+1.82)#7,565
71. Bluebell 5.3% 3.2% (+2.12)#71 3.5% (+1.82)#7,567
72. Monroe 5.3% 3.2% (+2.09)#72 3.5% (+1.79)#7,619
73. Hyrum 5.3% 3.2% (+2.07)#73 3.5% (+1.77)#7,693
74. Heber 5.2% 3.2% (+2.02)#74 3.5% (+1.72)#7,795
75. Kanab 5.2% 3.2% (+2.00)#75 3.5% (+1.70)#7,855
76. South Salt Lake 5.0% 3.2% (+1.82)#76 3.5% (+1.52)#8,234
77. Payson 5.0% 3.2% (+1.78)#77 3.5% (+1.48)#8,328
78. Magna 4.9% 3.2% (+1.71)#78 3.5% (+1.42)#8,482
79. Deweyville 4.8% 3.2% (+1.64)#79 3.5% (+1.34)#8,654
80. La Verkin 4.8% 3.2% (+1.63)#80 3.5% (+1.33)#8,684
81. Brigham City 4.7% 3.2% (+1.56)#81 3.5% (+1.26)#8,885
82. Richmond 4.7% 3.2% (+1.52)#82 3.5% (+1.22)#8,953
83. Maeser 4.7% 3.2% (+1.52)#83 3.5% (+1.22)#8,971
84. Farr West 4.6% 3.2% (+1.38)#84 3.5% (+1.08)#9,322
85. Cleveland 4.6% 3.2% (+1.38)#85 3.5% (+1.08)#9,325
86. Blanding 4.5% 3.2% (+1.29)#86 3.5% (+0.989)#9,584
87. Santa Clara 4.5% 3.2% (+1.28)#87 3.5% (+0.983)#9,608
88. Hooper 4.4% 3.2% (+1.26)#88 3.5% (+0.963)#9,644
89. St George 4.4% 3.2% (+1.24)#89 3.5% (+0.938)#9,728
90. Kanarraville 4.4% 3.2% (+1.19)#90 3.5% (+0.892)#9,861
91. Mount Pleasant 4.3% 3.2% (+1.17)#91 3.5% (+0.865)#9,935
92. North Ogden 4.3% 3.2% (+1.13)#92 3.5% (+0.831)#10,051
93. Park City 4.3% 3.2% (+1.12)#93 3.5% (+0.818)#10,100
94. Roy 4.3% 3.2% (+1.08)#94 3.5% (+0.776)#10,186
95. Cedar City 4.2% 3.2% (+1.02)#95 3.5% (+0.720)#10,360
96. North Logan 4.2% 3.2% (+1.02)#96 3.5% (+0.716)#10,378
97. South Weber 4.2% 3.2% (+0.991)#97 3.5% (+0.691)#10,438
98. West Valley City 4.2% 3.2% (+0.985)#98 3.5% (+0.685)#10,453
99. West Haven 4.1% 3.2% (+0.910)#99 3.5% (+0.610)#10,713
100. Springdale 4.1% 3.2% (+0.908)#100 3.5% (+0.608)#10,720

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Utah?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Utah are:
#1
100.0%
#2
48.7%
#3
46.2%
#4
34.6%
#5
24.7%
#6
23.5%
#7
22.8%
#8
21.3%
#9
20.4%
#10
18.4%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Utah?
Randlett has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Utah with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the State of Utah?
Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Utah is 3.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States is 3.5%.