Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Wisconsin

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Cleaning & Maintenance
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Wisconsin
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Wisconsin

0.0%
50.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Wisconsin Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Wisconsin

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Clam Lake 50.0% 3.1% (+46.9)#1 3.5% (+46.5)#84
2. Big Falls 36.1% 3.1% (+33.0)#2 3.5% (+32.6)#180
3. Springbrook 27.0% 3.1% (+24.0)#3 3.5% (+23.5)#331
4. Drummond 25.0% 3.1% (+21.9)#4 3.5% (+21.5)#386
5. New Post 24.4% 3.1% (+21.3)#5 3.5% (+20.9)#415
6. Dunbar 24.0% 3.1% (+20.9)#6 3.5% (+20.5)#427
7. Gordon 22.2% 3.1% (+19.1)#7 3.5% (+18.7)#508
8. Baileys Harbor 18.0% 3.1% (+15.0)#8 3.5% (+14.6)#784
9. Tustin 17.0% 3.1% (+13.9)#9 3.5% (+13.5)#879
10. Keshena 16.9% 3.1% (+13.8)#10 3.5% (+13.4)#887
11. Middle Village 16.7% 3.1% (+13.6)#11 3.5% (+13.2)#905
12. Seneca 14.5% 3.1% (+11.5)#12 3.5% (+11.0)#1,203
13. Babcock 14.3% 3.1% (+11.2)#13 3.5% (+10.8)#1,248
14. Friendship 14.0% 3.1% (+10.9)#14 3.5% (+10.5)#1,306
15. Bluffview 13.9% 3.1% (+10.8)#15 3.5% (+10.4)#1,323
16. Franks Field 13.6% 3.1% (+10.6)#16 3.5% (+10.2)#1,380
17. New Odanah 12.8% 3.1% (+9.71)#17 3.5% (+9.30)#1,619
18. Reserve 12.6% 3.1% (+9.53)#18 3.5% (+9.12)#1,661
19. Lily Lake 12.4% 3.1% (+9.36)#19 3.5% (+8.95)#1,725
20. Merrillan 12.2% 3.1% (+9.13)#20 3.5% (+8.72)#1,790
21. Alto 12.1% 3.1% (+9.05)#21 3.5% (+8.64)#1,817
22. Warrens 11.2% 3.1% (+8.08)#22 3.5% (+7.67)#2,139
23. St Nazianz 11.1% 3.1% (+8.01)#23 3.5% (+7.60)#2,180
24. Lac Du Flambeau 10.9% 3.1% (+7.84)#24 3.5% (+7.43)#2,245
25. Oakdale 10.9% 3.1% (+7.83)#25 3.5% (+7.41)#2,250
26. Monticello 10.1% 3.1% (+7.07)#26 3.5% (+6.66)#2,546
27. Cable 10.1% 3.1% (+7.02)#27 3.5% (+6.61)#2,572
28. Merrimac 10.0% 3.1% (+6.93)#28 3.5% (+6.52)#2,616
29. Rosholt 10.0% 3.1% (+6.88)#29 3.5% (+6.47)#2,654
30. Cornucopia 9.4% 3.1% (+6.30)#30 3.5% (+5.89)#2,968
31. Barronett 9.3% 3.1% (+6.23)#31 3.5% (+5.82)#3,000
32. Eureka 9.3% 3.1% (+6.20)#32 3.5% (+5.79)#3,012
33. Lake Delton 9.2% 3.1% (+6.15)#33 3.5% (+5.74)#3,038
34. Ingram 9.1% 3.1% (+6.02)#34 3.5% (+5.61)#3,121
35. Lakewood 9.0% 3.1% (+5.95)#35 3.5% (+5.54)#3,166
36. Arcadia 9.0% 3.1% (+5.91)#36 3.5% (+5.50)#3,191
37. Lake Arrowhead 9.0% 3.1% (+5.88)#37 3.5% (+5.47)#3,199
38. Mellen 8.9% 3.1% (+5.81)#38 3.5% (+5.40)#3,271
39. Chaseburg 8.8% 3.1% (+5.71)#39 3.5% (+5.30)#3,339
40. Milladore 8.7% 3.1% (+5.60)#40 3.5% (+5.19)#3,423
41. Galesville 8.5% 3.1% (+5.47)#41 3.5% (+5.06)#3,510
42. French Island 8.5% 3.1% (+5.47)#42 3.5% (+5.06)#3,511
43. Wild Rose 8.5% 3.1% (+5.47)#43 3.5% (+5.06)#3,512
44. Westboro 8.5% 3.1% (+5.44)#44 3.5% (+5.03)#3,540
45. Waubeka 8.5% 3.1% (+5.42)#45 3.5% (+5.01)#3,549
46. Diamond Bluff 8.4% 3.1% (+5.36)#46 3.5% (+4.95)#3,592
47. Hustler 8.4% 3.1% (+5.35)#47 3.5% (+4.94)#3,603
48. Black River Falls 8.3% 3.1% (+5.24)#48 3.5% (+4.83)#3,692
49. Withee 8.2% 3.1% (+5.17)#49 3.5% (+4.76)#3,755
50. Steuben 8.2% 3.1% (+5.12)#50 3.5% (+4.71)#3,796
51. Eagle 8.2% 3.1% (+5.08)#51 3.5% (+4.67)#3,838
52. Westfield 8.1% 3.1% (+5.06)#52 3.5% (+4.65)#3,854
53. Denmark 8.1% 3.1% (+5.05)#53 3.5% (+4.64)#3,864
54. Florence 8.1% 3.1% (+5.02)#54 3.5% (+4.61)#3,891
55. Nekoosa 8.0% 3.1% (+4.91)#55 3.5% (+4.50)#3,979
56. Crandon 8.0% 3.1% (+4.91)#56 3.5% (+4.50)#3,980
57. Sauk City 7.9% 3.1% (+4.86)#57 3.5% (+4.45)#4,019
58. King 7.9% 3.1% (+4.80)#58 3.5% (+4.39)#4,081
59. Downsville 7.8% 3.1% (+4.72)#59 3.5% (+4.31)#4,156
60. Darien 7.7% 3.1% (+4.64)#60 3.5% (+4.23)#4,206
61. Prairie Farm 7.7% 3.1% (+4.62)#61 3.5% (+4.21)#4,226
62. Hatfield 7.7% 3.1% (+4.62)#62 3.5% (+4.21)#4,238
63. Chelsea 7.7% 3.1% (+4.62)#63 3.5% (+4.21)#4,248
64. Somerset 7.7% 3.1% (+4.61)#64 3.5% (+4.20)#4,261
65. Sullivan 7.7% 3.1% (+4.60)#65 3.5% (+4.19)#4,267
66. Mercer 7.7% 3.1% (+4.59)#66 3.5% (+4.18)#4,273
67. Briggsville 7.6% 3.1% (+4.54)#67 3.5% (+4.13)#4,317
68. Cascade 7.6% 3.1% (+4.52)#68 3.5% (+4.11)#4,339
69. Big Foot Prairie 7.6% 3.1% (+4.50)#69 3.5% (+4.09)#4,354
70. Mindoro 7.6% 3.1% (+4.49)#70 3.5% (+4.08)#4,365
71. Eagle Lake 7.4% 3.1% (+4.32)#71 3.5% (+3.90)#4,538
72. Packwaukee 7.4% 3.1% (+4.28)#72 3.5% (+3.87)#4,570
73. Chippewa Falls 7.3% 3.1% (+4.27)#73 3.5% (+3.86)#4,585
74. Readstown 7.2% 3.1% (+4.12)#74 3.5% (+3.71)#4,739
75. Soldiers Grove 7.1% 3.1% (+4.07)#75 3.5% (+3.66)#4,773
76. Manawa 7.0% 3.1% (+3.98)#76 3.5% (+3.57)#4,868
77. Arkdale 7.0% 3.1% (+3.95)#77 3.5% (+3.53)#4,906
78. Mountain 7.0% 3.1% (+3.88)#78 3.5% (+3.47)#4,981
79. St Cloud 6.9% 3.1% (+3.84)#79 3.5% (+3.43)#5,039
80. Wauzeka 6.8% 3.1% (+3.73)#80 3.5% (+3.32)#5,191
81. Frederic 6.8% 3.1% (+3.71)#81 3.5% (+3.30)#5,221
82. Poy Sippi 6.8% 3.1% (+3.69)#82 3.5% (+3.28)#5,236
83. Vesper 6.8% 3.1% (+3.68)#83 3.5% (+3.27)#5,257
84. Milltown 6.7% 3.1% (+3.64)#84 3.5% (+3.23)#5,295
85. Mission 6.7% 3.1% (+3.59)#85 3.5% (+3.18)#5,364
86. Hebron 6.7% 3.1% (+3.59)#86 3.5% (+3.18)#5,368
87. Leopolis 6.7% 3.1% (+3.59)#87 3.5% (+3.18)#5,381
88. North Freedom 6.6% 3.1% (+3.53)#88 3.5% (+3.12)#5,447
89. Antigo 6.6% 3.1% (+3.51)#89 3.5% (+3.10)#5,470
90. Barron 6.5% 3.1% (+3.46)#90 3.5% (+3.05)#5,545
91. Black Earth 6.5% 3.1% (+3.41)#91 3.5% (+3.00)#5,615
92. Eagle River 6.5% 3.1% (+3.41)#92 3.5% (+3.00)#5,623
93. Endeavor 6.4% 3.1% (+3.36)#93 3.5% (+2.95)#5,692
94. Bear Creek 6.4% 3.1% (+3.36)#94 3.5% (+2.95)#5,693
95. Sturgeon Bay 6.4% 3.1% (+3.34)#95 3.5% (+2.93)#5,719
96. Lone Rock 6.4% 3.1% (+3.34)#96 3.5% (+2.92)#5,721
97. Mazomanie 6.4% 3.1% (+3.33)#97 3.5% (+2.92)#5,725
98. Lohrville 6.4% 3.1% (+3.33)#98 3.5% (+2.92)#5,727
99. De Soto 6.4% 3.1% (+3.33)#99 3.5% (+2.92)#5,734
100. St Joseph 6.4% 3.1% (+3.32)#100 3.5% (+2.91)#5,742

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Wisconsin?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Wisconsin are:
#1
50.0%
#2
36.1%
#3
27.0%
#4
25.0%
#5
24.4%
#6
24.0%
#7
22.2%
#8
18.0%
#9
17.0%
#10
16.9%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Wisconsin?
Clam Lake has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Wisconsin with 50.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the State of Wisconsin?
Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Wisconsin is 3.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States is 3.5%.