Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Cleaning & Maintenance
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Oklahoma

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Hopeton 100.0% 3.6% (+96.4)#1 3.5% (+96.5)#27
2. Hoyt 41.7% 3.6% (+38.0)#2 3.5% (+38.2)#131
3. Dixon 37.6% 3.6% (+34.0)#3 3.5% (+34.2)#162
4. Albion 33.3% 3.6% (+29.7)#4 3.5% (+29.9)#218
5. Bentley 28.9% 3.6% (+25.3)#5 3.5% (+25.5)#288
6. Oakwood 28.6% 3.6% (+24.9)#6 3.5% (+25.1)#301
7. Elohim 25.0% 3.6% (+21.4)#7 3.5% (+21.5)#395
8. Rosston 25.0% 3.6% (+21.4)#8 3.5% (+21.5)#396
9. Middleberg 24.2% 3.6% (+20.6)#9 3.5% (+20.8)#421
10. Albany 24.0% 3.6% (+20.4)#10 3.5% (+20.5)#426
11. Warwick 23.2% 3.6% (+19.6)#11 3.5% (+19.7)#462
12. Lowrey 22.3% 3.6% (+18.7)#12 3.5% (+18.9)#499
13. Valley Park 22.2% 3.6% (+18.6)#13 3.5% (+18.7)#516
14. Boley 21.5% 3.6% (+17.9)#14 3.5% (+18.0)#545
15. Sportmans Shores 20.8% 3.6% (+17.2)#15 3.5% (+17.4)#579
16. Ringwood 20.8% 3.6% (+17.2)#16 3.5% (+17.3)#581
17. Martha 20.0% 3.6% (+16.4)#17 3.5% (+16.5)#628
18. Cottonwood 18.4% 3.6% (+14.8)#18 3.5% (+14.9)#737
19. Shady Grove Cdp Mcintosh County 18.3% 3.6% (+14.7)#19 3.5% (+14.8)#749
20. Blanco 18.2% 3.6% (+14.5)#20 3.5% (+14.7)#769
21. Tamaha 17.5% 3.6% (+13.9)#21 3.5% (+14.0)#820
22. Keota 17.2% 3.6% (+13.5)#22 3.5% (+13.7)#861
23. Tonkawa Tribal Housing 17.0% 3.6% (+13.4)#23 3.5% (+13.5)#876
24. Meno 16.8% 3.6% (+13.1)#24 3.5% (+13.3)#898
25. Hodgen 16.7% 3.6% (+13.0)#25 3.5% (+13.2)#911
26. Loyal 16.1% 3.6% (+12.5)#26 3.5% (+12.6)#975
27. Eldon 15.9% 3.6% (+12.3)#27 3.5% (+12.5)#989
28. Gage 15.8% 3.6% (+12.2)#28 3.5% (+12.3)#1,004
29. Carlton Landing 15.8% 3.6% (+12.2)#29 3.5% (+12.3)#1,009
30. North Miami 15.7% 3.6% (+12.1)#30 3.5% (+12.2)#1,018
31. Washita 15.6% 3.6% (+11.9)#31 3.5% (+12.1)#1,036
32. Cromwell 15.4% 3.6% (+11.7)#32 3.5% (+11.9)#1,057
33. Whippoorwill 15.4% 3.6% (+11.7)#33 3.5% (+11.9)#1,061
34. Crescent Springs 15.2% 3.6% (+11.6)#34 3.5% (+11.7)#1,077
35. Lake Aluma 14.8% 3.6% (+11.2)#35 3.5% (+11.3)#1,143
36. Lane 14.5% 3.6% (+10.9)#36 3.5% (+11.1)#1,196
37. Twin Oaks 14.3% 3.6% (+10.7)#37 3.5% (+10.8)#1,235
38. Tyrone 14.2% 3.6% (+10.5)#38 3.5% (+10.7)#1,266
39. Dustin 13.6% 3.6% (+9.92)#39 3.5% (+10.1)#1,397
40. Pittsburg 13.6% 3.6% (+9.92)#40 3.5% (+10.1)#1,398
41. Hillsdale 13.5% 3.6% (+9.88)#41 3.5% (+10.0)#1,406
42. Paradise Hill 13.3% 3.6% (+9.70)#42 3.5% (+9.85)#1,452
43. Langley 13.2% 3.6% (+9.54)#43 3.5% (+9.69)#1,489
44. Pettit 13.1% 3.6% (+9.45)#44 3.5% (+9.60)#1,510
45. Olustee 13.1% 3.6% (+9.45)#45 3.5% (+9.60)#1,511
46. Stoney Point 13.0% 3.6% (+9.41)#46 3.5% (+9.56)#1,529
47. Sparks 12.7% 3.6% (+9.09)#47 3.5% (+9.24)#1,634
48. Mallard Bay 12.7% 3.6% (+9.06)#48 3.5% (+9.22)#1,639
49. Devol 12.7% 3.6% (+9.04)#49 3.5% (+9.19)#1,644
50. Taylor Ferry 12.6% 3.6% (+9.00)#50 3.5% (+9.15)#1,655
51. Kingfisher 12.6% 3.6% (+8.93)#51 3.5% (+9.08)#1,673
52. Kendrick 12.5% 3.6% (+8.86)#52 3.5% (+9.02)#1,696
53. Broken Bow 12.5% 3.6% (+8.83)#53 3.5% (+8.99)#1,710
54. Red Rock 12.2% 3.6% (+8.59)#54 3.5% (+8.74)#1,784
55. Arapaho 12.1% 3.6% (+8.51)#55 3.5% (+8.66)#1,809
56. Glencoe 12.1% 3.6% (+8.47)#56 3.5% (+8.62)#1,821
57. Fox 12.0% 3.6% (+8.36)#57 3.5% (+8.52)#1,861
58. Cheyenne 12.0% 3.6% (+8.33)#58 3.5% (+8.48)#1,870
59. Belfonte 11.9% 3.6% (+8.27)#59 3.5% (+8.42)#1,892
60. Texanna 11.9% 3.6% (+8.26)#60 3.5% (+8.41)#1,899
61. Grand Lake Towne 11.5% 3.6% (+7.90)#61 3.5% (+8.06)#1,994
62. Rose 11.4% 3.6% (+7.79)#62 3.5% (+7.95)#2,039
63. Osage 11.4% 3.6% (+7.79)#63 3.5% (+7.95)#2,041
64. River Bottom 11.4% 3.6% (+7.73)#64 3.5% (+7.88)#2,069
65. Eldorado 11.3% 3.6% (+7.64)#65 3.5% (+7.79)#2,106
66. Cookson 11.3% 3.6% (+7.62)#66 3.5% (+7.78)#2,110
67. Heavener 11.2% 3.6% (+7.52)#67 3.5% (+7.67)#2,142
68. Mead 11.1% 3.6% (+7.48)#68 3.5% (+7.63)#2,161
69. Soper 11.1% 3.6% (+7.48)#69 3.5% (+7.63)#2,163
70. Garvin 11.1% 3.6% (+7.48)#70 3.5% (+7.63)#2,168
71. Aline 11.0% 3.6% (+7.38)#71 3.5% (+7.53)#2,198
72. Reydon 10.8% 3.6% (+7.18)#72 3.5% (+7.33)#2,281
73. Wakita 10.8% 3.6% (+7.15)#73 3.5% (+7.30)#2,292
74. Waurika 10.7% 3.6% (+7.10)#74 3.5% (+7.25)#2,308
75. Welty 10.6% 3.6% (+7.00)#75 3.5% (+7.16)#2,346
76. Sweetwater 10.6% 3.6% (+6.97)#76 3.5% (+7.12)#2,357
77. Swink 10.5% 3.6% (+6.89)#77 3.5% (+7.04)#2,396
78. Covington 10.5% 3.6% (+6.86)#78 3.5% (+7.02)#2,401
79. Madill 10.4% 3.6% (+6.80)#79 3.5% (+6.95)#2,435
80. Chance 10.4% 3.6% (+6.76)#80 3.5% (+6.92)#2,452
81. Fittstown 10.0% 3.6% (+6.36)#81 3.5% (+6.52)#2,639
82. Elmer 10.0% 3.6% (+6.36)#82 3.5% (+6.52)#2,641
83. Thackerville 10.0% 3.6% (+6.32)#83 3.5% (+6.47)#2,657
84. White Oak 9.9% 3.6% (+6.22)#84 3.5% (+6.38)#2,713
85. Welling 9.7% 3.6% (+6.11)#85 3.5% (+6.26)#2,775
86. Scipio 9.7% 3.6% (+6.04)#86 3.5% (+6.19)#2,801
87. Hunter 9.6% 3.6% (+5.98)#87 3.5% (+6.13)#2,834
88. Freedom 9.6% 3.6% (+5.94)#88 3.5% (+6.09)#2,860
89. Rocky Point 9.4% 3.6% (+5.81)#89 3.5% (+5.96)#2,919
90. Arnett 9.4% 3.6% (+5.81)#90 3.5% (+5.96)#2,920
91. Nicut 9.4% 3.6% (+5.80)#91 3.5% (+5.95)#2,926
92. Ripley 9.4% 3.6% (+5.80)#92 3.5% (+5.95)#2,927
93. Oaks 9.1% 3.6% (+5.46)#93 3.5% (+5.61)#3,097
94. Lebanon 9.1% 3.6% (+5.46)#94 3.5% (+5.61)#3,106
95. Monroe 9.1% 3.6% (+5.46)#95 3.5% (+5.61)#3,112
96. Kildare 9.1% 3.6% (+5.46)#96 3.5% (+5.61)#3,117
97. Maramec 9.1% 3.6% (+5.46)#97 3.5% (+5.61)#3,119
98. Golden 9.1% 3.6% (+5.46)#98 3.5% (+5.61)#3,125
99. Foraker 9.1% 3.6% (+5.46)#99 3.5% (+5.61)#3,127
100. Geary 9.1% 3.6% (+5.43)#100 3.5% (+5.58)#3,141

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Oklahoma are:
#1
33.3%
#2
28.6%
#3
25.0%
#4
24.0%
#5
23.2%
#6
22.2%
#7
21.5%
#8
20.8%
#9
20.0%
#10
18.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Oklahoma?
Albion has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Oklahoma with 33.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Oklahoma is 3.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States is 3.5%.