Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Missouri

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Cleaning & Maintenance
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Missouri
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Missouri

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Missouri Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Missouri

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Rayville 100.0% 3.2% (+96.8)#1 3.5% (+96.5)#3
2. Chain O Lakes 82.1% 3.2% (+79.0)#2 3.5% (+78.7)#34
3. Dalton 71.4% 3.2% (+68.3)#3 3.5% (+67.9)#41
4. White Branch 55.4% 3.2% (+52.2)#4 3.5% (+51.9)#65
5. Hunter 54.9% 3.2% (+51.7)#5 3.5% (+51.4)#66
6. Worthington 40.0% 3.2% (+36.8)#6 3.5% (+36.5)#143
7. Wheatland 36.1% 3.2% (+33.0)#7 3.5% (+32.7)#177
8. Glenwood 29.3% 3.2% (+26.1)#8 3.5% (+25.8)#279
9. Westboro 28.6% 3.2% (+25.4)#9 3.5% (+25.1)#299
10. Excelsior Estates 27.0% 3.2% (+23.8)#10 3.5% (+23.5)#332
11. Milford 25.0% 3.2% (+21.8)#11 3.5% (+21.5)#399
12. Holland 23.9% 3.2% (+20.7)#12 3.5% (+20.4)#433
13. Leslie 23.5% 3.2% (+20.4)#13 3.5% (+20.0)#448
14. Rocky Comfort 22.7% 3.2% (+19.5)#14 3.5% (+19.2)#486
15. Doe Run 22.1% 3.2% (+19.0)#15 3.5% (+18.7)#520
16. Baring 21.4% 3.2% (+18.3)#16 3.5% (+17.9)#551
17. Annapolis 21.1% 3.2% (+17.9)#17 3.5% (+17.6)#565
18. Brownington 20.6% 3.2% (+17.4)#18 3.5% (+17.1)#594
19. Plato 20.5% 3.2% (+17.3)#19 3.5% (+17.0)#604
20. Arbela 20.0% 3.2% (+16.8)#20 3.5% (+16.5)#635
21. Cliff Village 20.0% 3.2% (+16.8)#21 3.5% (+16.5)#636
22. Cosby 19.5% 3.2% (+16.3)#22 3.5% (+16.0)#672
23. Grayson 19.4% 3.2% (+16.3)#23 3.5% (+16.0)#673
24. Pine Lawn 19.4% 3.2% (+16.2)#24 3.5% (+15.9)#678
25. Hartwell 19.0% 3.2% (+15.9)#25 3.5% (+15.6)#701
26. Kidder 18.8% 3.2% (+15.6)#26 3.5% (+15.3)#712
27. Ethel 18.8% 3.2% (+15.6)#27 3.5% (+15.3)#719
28. Worth 18.2% 3.2% (+15.0)#28 3.5% (+14.7)#773
29. Edgar Springs 17.6% 3.2% (+14.5)#29 3.5% (+14.2)#809
30. Aldrich 17.6% 3.2% (+14.5)#30 3.5% (+14.2)#812
31. Morrison 17.6% 3.2% (+14.5)#31 3.5% (+14.2)#813
32. Pocahontas 17.4% 3.2% (+14.2)#32 3.5% (+13.9)#835
33. Viburnum 17.3% 3.2% (+14.1)#33 3.5% (+13.8)#843
34. Higbee 17.2% 3.2% (+14.0)#34 3.5% (+13.7)#862
35. Big Spring 16.3% 3.2% (+13.1)#35 3.5% (+12.8)#952
36. Weingarten 16.2% 3.2% (+13.0)#36 3.5% (+12.7)#965
37. Dadeville 15.7% 3.2% (+12.6)#37 3.5% (+12.2)#1,012
38. Spickard 15.6% 3.2% (+12.4)#38 3.5% (+12.1)#1,031
39. Fountain N Lakes 15.4% 3.2% (+12.2)#39 3.5% (+11.9)#1,058
40. Tallapoosa 15.0% 3.2% (+11.8)#40 3.5% (+11.5)#1,114
41. Bakersfield 14.9% 3.2% (+11.8)#41 3.5% (+11.5)#1,121
42. St Mary 14.7% 3.2% (+11.6)#42 3.5% (+11.3)#1,150
43. Hale 14.6% 3.2% (+11.4)#43 3.5% (+11.1)#1,183
44. Bunceton 14.5% 3.2% (+11.3)#44 3.5% (+11.0)#1,216
45. Des Arc 14.5% 3.2% (+11.3)#45 3.5% (+11.0)#1,218
46. Kingsville 14.4% 3.2% (+11.2)#46 3.5% (+10.9)#1,224
47. Old Monroe 13.9% 3.2% (+10.7)#47 3.5% (+10.4)#1,334
48. Brooklyn Heights 13.8% 3.2% (+10.6)#48 3.5% (+10.3)#1,348
49. Newburg 13.3% 3.2% (+10.2)#49 3.5% (+9.85)#1,445
50. Humphreys 13.3% 3.2% (+10.2)#50 3.5% (+9.85)#1,451
51. Briarwood Estates 13.2% 3.2% (+10.0)#51 3.5% (+9.70)#1,488
52. Theodosia 13.0% 3.2% (+9.87)#52 3.5% (+9.56)#1,530
53. Unionville 13.0% 3.2% (+9.85)#53 3.5% (+9.54)#1,538
54. Beverly Hills 13.0% 3.2% (+9.81)#54 3.5% (+9.50)#1,548
55. Cobalt 13.0% 3.2% (+9.79)#55 3.5% (+9.48)#1,553
56. Whiteside 13.0% 3.2% (+9.79)#56 3.5% (+9.48)#1,557
57. Wheaton 12.9% 3.2% (+9.71)#57 3.5% (+9.40)#1,577
58. Lake Lafayette 12.7% 3.2% (+9.50)#58 3.5% (+9.19)#1,643
59. Pagedale 12.6% 3.2% (+9.38)#59 3.5% (+9.07)#1,676
60. Williamsville 12.5% 3.2% (+9.32)#60 3.5% (+9.02)#1,685
61. Brimson 12.5% 3.2% (+9.32)#61 3.5% (+9.02)#1,701
62. Wooldridge 12.5% 3.2% (+9.32)#62 3.5% (+9.02)#1,703
63. Elmer 12.5% 3.2% (+9.32)#63 3.5% (+9.02)#1,704
64. Sarcoxie 12.4% 3.2% (+9.22)#64 3.5% (+8.92)#1,738
65. Rockaway Beach 12.2% 3.2% (+9.06)#65 3.5% (+8.75)#1,778
66. Woodson Terrace 12.2% 3.2% (+8.99)#66 3.5% (+8.68)#1,802
67. Blue Summit 12.2% 3.2% (+8.99)#67 3.5% (+8.68)#1,803
68. Mill Spring 12.1% 3.2% (+8.94)#68 3.5% (+8.64)#1,816
69. Hayti Heights 12.1% 3.2% (+8.88)#69 3.5% (+8.57)#1,834
70. Conception Junction 12.0% 3.2% (+8.87)#70 3.5% (+8.57)#1,839
71. Pomona 12.0% 3.2% (+8.78)#71 3.5% (+8.47)#1,877
72. Tarkio 11.9% 3.2% (+8.72)#72 3.5% (+8.42)#1,896
73. Wardell 11.9% 3.2% (+8.70)#73 3.5% (+8.39)#1,903
74. Homestown 11.8% 3.2% (+8.59)#74 3.5% (+8.28)#1,927
75. Flemington 11.8% 3.2% (+8.59)#75 3.5% (+8.28)#1,932
76. Clyde 11.8% 3.2% (+8.59)#76 3.5% (+8.28)#1,933
77. West Line 11.7% 3.2% (+8.49)#77 3.5% (+8.18)#1,960
78. Osceola 11.4% 3.2% (+8.18)#78 3.5% (+7.87)#2,075
79. New Florence 11.4% 3.2% (+8.18)#79 3.5% (+7.87)#2,078
80. Bucklin 11.3% 3.2% (+8.16)#80 3.5% (+7.85)#2,089
81. Goose Creek Lake 11.0% 3.2% (+7.86)#81 3.5% (+7.56)#2,190
82. Linneus 11.0% 3.2% (+7.81)#82 3.5% (+7.51)#2,208
83. Fairfax 10.8% 3.2% (+7.67)#83 3.5% (+7.36)#2,265
84. Turney 10.8% 3.2% (+7.63)#84 3.5% (+7.33)#2,282
85. Clarence 10.7% 3.2% (+7.57)#85 3.5% (+7.26)#2,301
86. Osage Beach 10.7% 3.2% (+7.52)#86 3.5% (+7.22)#2,325
87. Dawn 10.6% 3.2% (+7.46)#87 3.5% (+7.16)#2,348
88. Deepwater 10.6% 3.2% (+7.44)#88 3.5% (+7.14)#2,350
89. Benton City 10.4% 3.2% (+7.27)#89 3.5% (+6.97)#2,428
90. Houston Lake 10.4% 3.2% (+7.26)#90 3.5% (+6.96)#2,432
91. Tina 10.4% 3.2% (+7.21)#91 3.5% (+6.91)#2,456
92. Newark 10.3% 3.2% (+7.17)#92 3.5% (+6.86)#2,468
93. Wellsville 10.3% 3.2% (+7.15)#93 3.5% (+6.85)#2,472
94. Fisk 10.3% 3.2% (+7.09)#94 3.5% (+6.79)#2,498
95. Lewistown 10.1% 3.2% (+6.94)#95 3.5% (+6.63)#2,563
96. Passaic 10.0% 3.2% (+6.82)#96 3.5% (+6.52)#2,638
97. Raymondville 9.8% 3.2% (+6.62)#97 3.5% (+6.31)#2,752
98. Branson West 9.8% 3.2% (+6.61)#98 3.5% (+6.31)#2,755
99. Ewing 9.8% 3.2% (+6.60)#99 3.5% (+6.29)#2,760
100. Barnard 9.7% 3.2% (+6.53)#100 3.5% (+6.23)#2,785

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Missouri?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Missouri are:
#1
100.0%
#2
82.1%
#3
71.4%
#4
54.9%
#5
40.0%
#6
36.1%
#7
29.3%
#8
28.6%
#9
27.0%
#10
25.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Missouri?
Rayville has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Missouri with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the State of Missouri?
Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Missouri is 3.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States is 3.5%.