Cities with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Alabama

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Alabama
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Alabama

15.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Alabama Map

Cities with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Alabama

City Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. Vestavia Hills 0.28% 22.6% (-22.3)#1 17.0% (-16.7)#10
2. Trussville 0.32% 22.6% (-22.3)#2 17.0% (-16.7)#15
3. Mountain Brook 0.75% 22.6% (-21.8)#3 17.0% (-16.2)#85
4. Kimberly 0.78% 22.6% (-21.8)#4 17.0% (-16.2)#95
5. Spanish Fort 0.97% 22.6% (-21.6)#5 17.0% (-16.0)#156
6. Parrish 1.0% 22.6% (-21.6)#6 17.0% (-15.9)#175
7. Homewood 1.1% 22.6% (-21.5)#7 17.0% (-15.9)#185
8. Huguley 1.2% 22.6% (-21.4)#8 17.0% (-15.8)#219
9. Margaret 1.2% 22.6% (-21.4)#9 17.0% (-15.8)#232
10. Pennington 1.3% 22.6% (-21.3)#10 17.0% (-15.7)#288
11. Triana 1.6% 22.6% (-21.0)#11 17.0% (-15.4)#373
12. Priceville 1.8% 22.6% (-20.8)#12 17.0% (-15.1)#505
13. Deatsville 2.1% 22.6% (-20.5)#13 17.0% (-14.9)#664
14. Trinity 2.2% 22.6% (-20.4)#14 17.0% (-14.8)#682
15. Summerdale 2.2% 22.6% (-20.4)#15 17.0% (-14.8)#697
16. Gardendale 2.2% 22.6% (-20.4)#16 17.0% (-14.7)#735
17. Leesburg 2.3% 22.6% (-20.3)#17 17.0% (-14.7)#755
18. Gurley 2.6% 22.6% (-20.0)#18 17.0% (-14.3)#950
19. Eagle Point 2.7% 22.6% (-19.9)#19 17.0% (-14.3)#978
20. Emerald Mountain 2.8% 22.6% (-19.8)#20 17.0% (-14.1)#1,071
21. Glencoe 2.9% 22.6% (-19.7)#21 17.0% (-14.1)#1,081
22. Citronelle 3.0% 22.6% (-19.6)#22 17.0% (-14.0)#1,172
23. Madrid 3.0% 22.6% (-19.6)#23 17.0% (-13.9)#1,199
24. Grant 3.1% 22.6% (-19.5)#24 17.0% (-13.9)#1,249
25. Springville 3.3% 22.6% (-19.3)#25 17.0% (-13.7)#1,332
26. Madison 3.5% 22.6% (-19.1)#26 17.0% (-13.5)#1,463
27. Level Plains 3.5% 22.6% (-19.1)#27 17.0% (-13.5)#1,474
28. Frisco City 3.7% 22.6% (-18.9)#28 17.0% (-13.3)#1,583
29. Black 3.9% 22.6% (-18.7)#29 17.0% (-13.0)#1,763
30. Alabaster 4.0% 22.6% (-18.6)#30 17.0% (-12.9)#1,816
31. Ladonia 4.1% 22.6% (-18.5)#31 17.0% (-12.9)#1,826
32. Meadowbrook 4.2% 22.6% (-18.4)#32 17.0% (-12.8)#1,883
33. Lockhart 4.3% 22.6% (-18.3)#33 17.0% (-12.6)#2,026
34. Woodville 4.4% 22.6% (-18.2)#34 17.0% (-12.6)#2,047
35. Dozier 4.4% 22.6% (-18.2)#35 17.0% (-12.6)#2,069
36. Meridianville 4.5% 22.6% (-18.1)#36 17.0% (-12.5)#2,106
37. Chelsea 4.7% 22.6% (-17.9)#37 17.0% (-12.3)#2,230
38. Pike Road 4.7% 22.6% (-17.9)#38 17.0% (-12.3)#2,253
39. Ider 4.8% 22.6% (-17.8)#39 17.0% (-12.2)#2,286
40. Brookwood 5.0% 22.6% (-17.6)#40 17.0% (-12.0)#2,427
41. Wetumpka 5.0% 22.6% (-17.6)#41 17.0% (-12.0)#2,467
42. Argo 5.0% 22.6% (-17.6)#42 17.0% (-11.9)#2,483
43. Coaling 5.1% 22.6% (-17.5)#43 17.0% (-11.9)#2,506
44. Choccolocco 5.2% 22.6% (-17.4)#44 17.0% (-11.8)#2,569
45. Oneonta 5.2% 22.6% (-17.4)#45 17.0% (-11.8)#2,578
46. Cullman 5.2% 22.6% (-17.4)#46 17.0% (-11.7)#2,599
47. Pleasant Groves 5.6% 22.6% (-17.0)#47 17.0% (-11.4)#2,759
48. Helena 5.8% 22.6% (-16.8)#48 17.0% (-11.2)#2,877
49. Loxley 5.8% 22.6% (-16.8)#49 17.0% (-11.1)#2,922
50. New Hope 5.9% 22.6% (-16.7)#50 17.0% (-11.1)#2,973
51. Weaver 5.9% 22.6% (-16.7)#51 17.0% (-11.1)#2,977
52. Belk 6.1% 22.6% (-16.5)#52 17.0% (-10.9)#3,061
53. Berry 6.5% 22.6% (-16.1)#53 17.0% (-10.5)#3,262
54. Hurtsboro 6.5% 22.6% (-16.1)#54 17.0% (-10.5)#3,265
55. Stapleton 6.5% 22.6% (-16.1)#55 17.0% (-10.5)#3,287
56. Pelham 6.5% 22.6% (-16.1)#56 17.0% (-10.5)#3,292
57. Southside 6.5% 22.6% (-16.1)#57 17.0% (-10.5)#3,310
58. Clanton 6.5% 22.6% (-16.1)#58 17.0% (-10.5)#3,311
59. Hoover 7.0% 22.6% (-15.6)#59 17.0% (-9.94)#3,641
60. Calera 7.1% 22.6% (-15.5)#60 17.0% (-9.92)#3,653
61. Foley 7.1% 22.6% (-15.5)#61 17.0% (-9.86)#3,680
62. Susan Moore 7.3% 22.6% (-15.3)#62 17.0% (-9.66)#3,815
63. Morris 7.4% 22.6% (-15.2)#63 17.0% (-9.62)#3,833
64. Valley 7.6% 22.6% (-15.0)#64 17.0% (-9.42)#3,941
65. Robertsdale 7.7% 22.6% (-14.9)#65 17.0% (-9.31)#3,998
66. Glenwood 7.7% 22.6% (-14.9)#66 17.0% (-9.28)#4,038
67. Edgewater 7.8% 22.6% (-14.8)#67 17.0% (-9.16)#4,102
68. Gulf Shores 7.9% 22.6% (-14.7)#68 17.0% (-9.11)#4,131
69. Carlisle Rockledge 7.9% 22.6% (-14.7)#69 17.0% (-9.10)#4,137
70. Tallassee 8.0% 22.6% (-14.6)#70 17.0% (-9.02)#4,172
71. Lake View 8.0% 22.6% (-14.6)#71 17.0% (-8.94)#4,232
72. Hokes Bluff 8.2% 22.6% (-14.4)#72 17.0% (-8.76)#4,337
73. Shiloh 8.3% 22.6% (-14.3)#73 17.0% (-8.64)#4,395
74. Harpersville 8.4% 22.6% (-14.2)#74 17.0% (-8.60)#4,426
75. Pleasant Grove 8.5% 22.6% (-14.1)#75 17.0% (-8.48)#4,485
76. Odenville 8.6% 22.6% (-14.0)#76 17.0% (-8.35)#4,552
77. Muscle Shoals 8.9% 22.6% (-13.7)#77 17.0% (-8.10)#4,665
78. Piedmont 9.0% 22.6% (-13.6)#78 17.0% (-7.97)#4,721
79. Hollywood 9.1% 22.6% (-13.5)#79 17.0% (-7.89)#4,771
80. Warrior 9.6% 22.6% (-13.0)#80 17.0% (-7.40)#5,047
81. Ballplay 9.8% 22.6% (-12.8)#81 17.0% (-7.22)#5,136
82. Hueytown 9.9% 22.6% (-12.7)#82 17.0% (-7.12)#5,191
83. Alexandria 9.9% 22.6% (-12.7)#83 17.0% (-7.12)#5,192
84. Moundville 10.1% 22.6% (-12.5)#84 17.0% (-6.89)#5,309
85. Headland 10.1% 22.6% (-12.5)#85 17.0% (-6.85)#5,329
86. Lexington 10.2% 22.6% (-12.4)#86 17.0% (-6.77)#5,366
87. Leeds 10.4% 22.6% (-12.2)#87 17.0% (-6.59)#5,469
88. Hartselle 10.5% 22.6% (-12.1)#88 17.0% (-6.46)#5,538
89. Cowarts 10.5% 22.6% (-12.1)#89 17.0% (-6.45)#5,543
90. Addison 10.5% 22.6% (-12.1)#90 17.0% (-6.45)#5,555
91. Westover 10.6% 22.6% (-12.0)#91 17.0% (-6.37)#5,603
92. Fairhope 10.6% 22.6% (-12.0)#92 17.0% (-6.35)#5,611
93. Saraland 10.7% 22.6% (-11.9)#93 17.0% (-6.30)#5,646
94. Millbrook 10.8% 22.6% (-11.8)#94 17.0% (-6.16)#5,711
95. Montevallo 11.0% 22.6% (-11.6)#95 17.0% (-5.95)#5,777
96. Ranburne 11.1% 22.6% (-11.5)#96 17.0% (-5.86)#5,834
97. North Johns 11.1% 22.6% (-11.5)#97 17.0% (-5.86)#5,865
98. Brantleyville 11.2% 22.6% (-11.4)#98 17.0% (-5.75)#5,913
99. New Site 11.3% 22.6% (-11.3)#99 17.0% (-5.64)#5,960
100. Malvern 11.5% 22.6% (-11.1)#100 17.0% (-5.48)#6,041

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Alabama?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Alabama are:
#1
0.28%
#2
0.32%
#3
0.75%
#4
0.78%
#5
0.97%
#6
1.0%
#7
1.1%
#8
1.2%
#9
1.2%
#10
1.3%
What city has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Alabama?
Vestavia Hills has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Alabama with 0.28%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the State of Alabama?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Alabama is 22.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.