Cities with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in South Dakota

25.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in South Dakota

City Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. Wall 1.3% 15.7% (-14.4)#1 17.0% (-15.7)#283
2. Wolsey 1.6% 15.7% (-14.1)#2 17.0% (-15.4)#382
3. Brandon 1.7% 15.7% (-14.0)#3 17.0% (-15.3)#436
4. Worthing 1.8% 15.7% (-13.9)#4 17.0% (-15.2)#498
5. Box Elder 2.1% 15.7% (-13.6)#5 17.0% (-14.9)#631
6. Fort Pierre 2.2% 15.7% (-13.5)#6 17.0% (-14.8)#691
7. Garretson 2.2% 15.7% (-13.4)#7 17.0% (-14.8)#721
8. Baltic 2.3% 15.7% (-13.4)#8 17.0% (-14.7)#754
9. Burke 2.3% 15.7% (-13.3)#9 17.0% (-14.7)#782
10. Stickney 2.5% 15.7% (-13.2)#10 17.0% (-14.5)#883
11. Hartford 2.6% 15.7% (-13.1)#11 17.0% (-14.4)#939
12. Gregory 2.7% 15.7% (-13.0)#12 17.0% (-14.3)#983
13. Valley Springs 2.9% 15.7% (-12.8)#13 17.0% (-14.1)#1,119
14. Parkston 3.1% 15.7% (-12.5)#14 17.0% (-13.8)#1,258
15. Parker 3.6% 15.7% (-12.0)#15 17.0% (-13.3)#1,577
16. Tabor 3.8% 15.7% (-11.9)#16 17.0% (-13.2)#1,646
17. Plankinton 3.8% 15.7% (-11.8)#17 17.0% (-13.1)#1,696
18. Florence 3.8% 15.7% (-11.8)#18 17.0% (-13.1)#1,702
19. Howard 4.4% 15.7% (-11.2)#19 17.0% (-12.5)#2,084
20. Belle Fourche 4.5% 15.7% (-11.2)#20 17.0% (-12.5)#2,110
21. Yankton 4.5% 15.7% (-11.2)#21 17.0% (-12.5)#2,131
22. Sturgis 4.5% 15.7% (-11.1)#22 17.0% (-12.4)#2,139
23. Mount Vernon 4.7% 15.7% (-11.0)#23 17.0% (-12.3)#2,240
24. Lake Preston 4.8% 15.7% (-10.9)#24 17.0% (-12.2)#2,289
25. Lake Norden 4.9% 15.7% (-10.8)#25 17.0% (-12.1)#2,381
26. Hazel 5.0% 15.7% (-10.7)#26 17.0% (-12.0)#2,463
27. Beresford 5.1% 15.7% (-10.6)#27 17.0% (-11.9)#2,499
28. Huron 5.2% 15.7% (-10.5)#28 17.0% (-11.8)#2,583
29. Montrose 5.6% 15.7% (-10.0)#29 17.0% (-11.3)#2,809
30. Dakota Dunes 6.4% 15.7% (-9.28)#30 17.0% (-10.6)#3,242
31. Colonial Pine Hills 6.9% 15.7% (-8.79)#31 17.0% (-10.1)#3,543
32. Hurley 6.9% 15.7% (-8.77)#32 17.0% (-10.1)#3,562
33. Scotland 6.9% 15.7% (-8.74)#33 17.0% (-10.0)#3,580
34. Green Valley 7.0% 15.7% (-8.69)#34 17.0% (-10.00)#3,603
35. Tyndall 7.0% 15.7% (-8.69)#35 17.0% (-10.00)#3,605
36. Whitewood 7.0% 15.7% (-8.65)#36 17.0% (-9.96)#3,630
37. Milbank 7.3% 15.7% (-8.40)#37 17.0% (-9.70)#3,783
38. Waubay 7.7% 15.7% (-7.98)#38 17.0% (-9.28)#4,027
39. Canton 8.0% 15.7% (-7.64)#39 17.0% (-8.95)#4,220
40. Piedmont 8.1% 15.7% (-7.53)#40 17.0% (-8.84)#4,298
41. Murdo 8.3% 15.7% (-7.34)#41 17.0% (-8.64)#4,389
42. New Effington 8.3% 15.7% (-7.34)#42 17.0% (-8.64)#4,409
43. Salem 8.6% 15.7% (-7.10)#43 17.0% (-8.40)#4,522
44. Woonsocket 8.7% 15.7% (-6.93)#44 17.0% (-8.24)#4,606
45. Summit 9.3% 15.7% (-6.37)#45 17.0% (-7.67)#4,891
46. Highmore 9.3% 15.7% (-6.34)#46 17.0% (-7.64)#4,909
47. Onida 9.5% 15.7% (-6.15)#47 17.0% (-7.45)#5,011
48. White 9.8% 15.7% (-5.91)#48 17.0% (-7.22)#5,141
49. Sioux Falls 10.2% 15.7% (-5.43)#49 17.0% (-6.73)#5,385
50. Wagner 10.3% 15.7% (-5.38)#50 17.0% (-6.69)#5,410
51. Meadow View Addition 10.3% 15.7% (-5.36)#51 17.0% (-6.67)#5,416
52. Deadwood 10.3% 15.7% (-5.35)#52 17.0% (-6.66)#5,422
53. Brookings 10.8% 15.7% (-4.88)#53 17.0% (-6.19)#5,695
54. Bristol 11.1% 15.7% (-4.56)#54 17.0% (-5.86)#5,850
55. Monroe 11.1% 15.7% (-4.56)#55 17.0% (-5.86)#5,852
56. Ethan 11.3% 15.7% (-4.35)#56 17.0% (-5.66)#5,956
57. Pierre 11.8% 15.7% (-3.91)#57 17.0% (-5.22)#6,139
58. White Lake 11.8% 15.7% (-3.90)#58 17.0% (-5.21)#6,151
59. Henry 11.8% 15.7% (-3.90)#59 17.0% (-5.21)#6,161
60. Tea 12.1% 15.7% (-3.58)#60 17.0% (-4.89)#6,306
61. Dell Rapids 12.8% 15.7% (-2.89)#61 17.0% (-4.20)#6,674
62. Estelline 12.8% 15.7% (-2.89)#62 17.0% (-4.19)#6,676
63. Spearfish 13.0% 15.7% (-2.63)#63 17.0% (-3.94)#6,777
64. Armour 13.5% 15.7% (-2.16)#64 17.0% (-3.46)#7,006
65. Summerset 14.1% 15.7% (-1.56)#65 17.0% (-2.87)#7,288
66. Doland 14.3% 15.7% (-1.38)#66 17.0% (-2.69)#7,393
67. Madison 14.3% 15.7% (-1.34)#67 17.0% (-2.64)#7,427
68. Astoria 15.0% 15.7% (-0.669)#68 17.0% (-1.98)#7,709
69. Jefferson 15.2% 15.7% (-0.517)#69 17.0% (-1.82)#7,777
70. Kennebec 15.2% 15.7% (-0.517)#70 17.0% (-1.82)#7,784
71. White Horse 15.2% 15.7% (-0.452)#71 17.0% (-1.76)#7,812
72. Arlington 15.3% 15.7% (-0.402)#72 17.0% (-1.71)#7,839
73. Vermillion 15.6% 15.7% (-0.079)#73 17.0% (-1.39)#8,006
74. Tripp 15.8% 15.7% (+0.121)#74 17.0% (-1.19)#8,079
75. Bowdle 16.1% 15.7% (+0.460)#75 17.0% (-0.847)#8,243
76. Britton 16.3% 15.7% (+0.658)#76 17.0% (-0.650)#8,329
77. Watertown 16.4% 15.7% (+0.739)#77 17.0% (-0.568)#8,360
78. Redfield 16.7% 15.7% (+0.998)#78 17.0% (-0.309)#8,427
79. Frederick 16.7% 15.7% (+0.998)#79 17.0% (-0.309)#8,479
80. Pierpont 16.7% 15.7% (+0.998)#80 17.0% (-0.309)#8,495
81. Claremont 16.7% 15.7% (+0.998)#81 17.0% (-0.309)#8,503
82. Morristown 16.7% 15.7% (+0.998)#82 17.0% (-0.309)#8,504
83. Keystone 17.1% 15.7% (+1.40)#83 17.0% (+0.097)#8,655
84. Lennox 17.8% 15.7% (+2.12)#84 17.0% (+0.810)#8,941
85. Rosholt 17.9% 15.7% (+2.19)#85 17.0% (+0.881)#8,969
86. Bridgewater 17.9% 15.7% (+2.28)#86 17.0% (+0.973)#9,007
87. Mitchell 18.0% 15.7% (+2.29)#87 17.0% (+0.985)#9,009
88. Chancellor 18.2% 15.7% (+2.51)#88 17.0% (+1.21)#9,103
89. Alcester 18.3% 15.7% (+2.59)#89 17.0% (+1.28)#9,136
90. Webster 18.3% 15.7% (+2.64)#90 17.0% (+1.33)#9,158
91. Fairfax 19.0% 15.7% (+3.38)#91 17.0% (+2.07)#9,447
92. Timber Lake 19.3% 15.7% (+3.61)#92 17.0% (+2.30)#9,533
93. North Spearfish 19.5% 15.7% (+3.84)#93 17.0% (+2.54)#9,609
94. Aberdeen 19.8% 15.7% (+4.09)#94 17.0% (+2.78)#9,700
95. Veblen 20.0% 15.7% (+4.33)#95 17.0% (+3.02)#9,804
96. Central City 20.0% 15.7% (+4.33)#96 17.0% (+3.02)#9,853
97. Chamberlain 20.3% 15.7% (+4.65)#97 17.0% (+3.34)#9,931
98. Eureka 21.0% 15.7% (+5.33)#98 17.0% (+4.02)#10,177
99. Gary 21.1% 15.7% (+5.38)#99 17.0% (+4.08)#10,202
100. Wakonda 21.2% 15.7% (+5.54)#100 17.0% (+4.24)#10,247

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in South Dakota are:
#1
1.3%
#2
1.6%
#3
1.7%
#4
1.8%
#5
2.1%
#6
2.2%
#7
2.2%
#8
2.3%
#9
2.3%
#10
2.5%
What city has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in South Dakota?
Wall has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in South Dakota with 1.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the State of South Dakota?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in South Dakota is 15.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.