Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Family Poverty
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in North Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in North Carolina

City Family Poverty vs State vs National
1. Long Creek 100.0% 9.5% (+90.5)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#63
2. Brunswick 84.1% 9.5% (+74.6)#2 8.8% (+75.3)#148
3. Silver City 72.5% 9.5% (+63.0)#3 8.8% (+63.7)#225
4. South Weldon 62.7% 9.5% (+53.2)#4 8.8% (+54.0)#343
5. Old Hundred 58.0% 9.5% (+48.5)#5 8.8% (+49.2)#424
6. Conetoe 55.4% 9.5% (+45.9)#6 8.8% (+46.6)#488
7. Love Valley 54.3% 9.5% (+44.8)#7 8.8% (+45.5)#520
8. Sandyfield 51.8% 9.5% (+42.3)#8 8.8% (+43.0)#597
9. Ivanhoe 51.5% 9.5% (+42.0)#9 8.8% (+42.7)#602
10. Maury 50.0% 9.5% (+40.5)#10 8.8% (+41.2)#640
11. Fountain 50.0% 9.5% (+40.5)#11 8.8% (+41.2)#643
12. Light Oak 48.9% 9.5% (+39.4)#12 8.8% (+40.1)#716
13. South Mills 48.8% 9.5% (+39.3)#13 8.8% (+40.0)#718
14. Chadbourn 47.0% 9.5% (+37.5)#14 8.8% (+38.3)#797
15. Elrod 46.6% 9.5% (+37.1)#15 8.8% (+37.8)#819
16. Middleburg 46.3% 9.5% (+36.8)#16 8.8% (+37.6)#822
17. Norman 45.5% 9.5% (+36.0)#17 8.8% (+36.7)#851
18. Barker Heights 43.3% 9.5% (+33.8)#18 8.8% (+34.6)#969
19. Columbia 42.6% 9.5% (+33.1)#19 8.8% (+33.9)#1,020
20. Ramseur 42.1% 9.5% (+32.6)#20 8.8% (+33.3)#1,049
21. Garland 41.8% 9.5% (+32.3)#21 8.8% (+33.0)#1,068
22. Bonnetsville 41.0% 9.5% (+31.5)#22 8.8% (+32.3)#1,141
23. Clarkton 41.0% 9.5% (+31.5)#23 8.8% (+32.2)#1,142
24. Biscoe 40.7% 9.5% (+31.2)#24 8.8% (+31.9)#1,161
25. Elizabethtown 39.9% 9.5% (+30.4)#25 8.8% (+31.1)#1,222
26. Chocowinity 39.4% 9.5% (+29.9)#26 8.8% (+30.6)#1,256
27. Pink Hill 37.9% 9.5% (+28.4)#27 8.8% (+29.1)#1,361
28. Vann Crossroads 37.5% 9.5% (+28.0)#28 8.8% (+28.7)#1,379
29. Roxobel 37.3% 9.5% (+27.8)#29 8.8% (+28.6)#1,403
30. Chowan Beach 37.1% 9.5% (+27.6)#30 8.8% (+28.4)#1,417
31. Lucama 36.1% 9.5% (+26.6)#31 8.8% (+27.3)#1,496
32. South Henderson 35.5% 9.5% (+26.0)#32 8.8% (+26.7)#1,556
33. Maxton 35.5% 9.5% (+26.0)#33 8.8% (+26.7)#1,558
34. Gorman 35.4% 9.5% (+25.9)#34 8.8% (+26.6)#1,569
35. Cherokee 35.0% 9.5% (+25.5)#35 8.8% (+26.2)#1,608
36. Robbinsville 34.7% 9.5% (+25.2)#36 8.8% (+25.9)#1,639
37. Williamston 34.3% 9.5% (+24.8)#37 8.8% (+25.5)#1,680
38. Edenton 34.2% 9.5% (+24.7)#38 8.8% (+25.4)#1,693
39. Cordova 34.0% 9.5% (+24.5)#39 8.8% (+25.2)#1,709
40. Kelford 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#40 8.8% (+24.6)#1,784
41. Red Springs 33.3% 9.5% (+23.8)#41 8.8% (+24.5)#1,835
42. Troy 32.8% 9.5% (+23.3)#42 8.8% (+24.0)#1,855
43. Sylva 32.7% 9.5% (+23.2)#43 8.8% (+23.9)#1,868
44. East Laurinburg 32.4% 9.5% (+22.9)#44 8.8% (+23.6)#1,898
45. Tabor City 32.2% 9.5% (+22.7)#45 8.8% (+23.5)#1,910
46. Mooresboro 31.5% 9.5% (+22.0)#46 8.8% (+22.7)#2,002
47. Benson 31.3% 9.5% (+21.8)#47 8.8% (+22.6)#2,022
48. Brogden 31.3% 9.5% (+21.8)#48 8.8% (+22.5)#2,029
49. Plymouth 31.2% 9.5% (+21.7)#49 8.8% (+22.4)#2,045
50. Shannon 31.0% 9.5% (+21.5)#50 8.8% (+22.3)#2,067
51. Conway 30.9% 9.5% (+21.4)#51 8.8% (+22.1)#2,078
52. Magnolia 30.7% 9.5% (+21.2)#52 8.8% (+22.0)#2,114
53. East Spencer 30.7% 9.5% (+21.2)#53 8.8% (+21.9)#2,121
54. Harrells 30.4% 9.5% (+20.9)#54 8.8% (+21.6)#2,166
55. Brookford 30.3% 9.5% (+20.8)#55 8.8% (+21.5)#2,181
56. Dudley 30.1% 9.5% (+20.6)#56 8.8% (+21.3)#2,208
57. Belhaven 29.7% 9.5% (+20.2)#57 8.8% (+21.0)#2,277
58. Beulaville 29.6% 9.5% (+20.1)#58 8.8% (+20.8)#2,294
59. Fairmont 29.2% 9.5% (+19.7)#59 8.8% (+20.5)#2,344
60. Laurinburg 28.8% 9.5% (+19.3)#60 8.8% (+20.1)#2,409
61. Forest City 28.8% 9.5% (+19.3)#61 8.8% (+20.0)#2,417
62. Mount Airy 28.8% 9.5% (+19.3)#62 8.8% (+20.0)#2,426
63. Hamlet 28.7% 9.5% (+19.2)#63 8.8% (+20.0)#2,430
64. Pembroke 28.6% 9.5% (+19.1)#64 8.8% (+19.8)#2,443
65. Gibson 28.6% 9.5% (+19.1)#65 8.8% (+19.8)#2,449
66. Bridgeton 28.1% 9.5% (+18.6)#66 8.8% (+19.3)#2,553
67. Creswell 27.9% 9.5% (+18.4)#67 8.8% (+19.1)#2,585
68. Reidsville 27.9% 9.5% (+18.4)#68 8.8% (+19.1)#2,587
69. Laurel Hill 27.9% 9.5% (+18.4)#69 8.8% (+19.1)#2,588
70. Patterson Springs 27.8% 9.5% (+18.3)#70 8.8% (+19.0)#2,607
71. Grimesland 27.5% 9.5% (+18.0)#71 8.8% (+18.7)#2,676
72. Momeyer 27.1% 9.5% (+17.6)#72 8.8% (+18.3)#2,749
73. China Grove 27.0% 9.5% (+17.5)#73 8.8% (+18.3)#2,756
74. Andrews 27.0% 9.5% (+17.5)#74 8.8% (+18.2)#2,760
75. Bolton 26.9% 9.5% (+17.4)#75 8.8% (+18.1)#2,799
76. Bayboro 26.7% 9.5% (+17.2)#76 8.8% (+17.9)#2,830
77. Fremont 26.6% 9.5% (+17.1)#77 8.8% (+17.9)#2,840
78. Scotland Neck 26.4% 9.5% (+16.9)#78 8.8% (+17.6)#2,900
79. Roxboro 26.2% 9.5% (+16.7)#79 8.8% (+17.4)#2,939
80. Wilson S Mills 26.1% 9.5% (+16.6)#80 8.8% (+17.3)#2,979
81. Simpson 25.8% 9.5% (+16.3)#81 8.8% (+17.1)#3,035
82. Fairplains 25.8% 9.5% (+16.3)#82 8.8% (+17.0)#3,036
83. Murfreesboro 25.6% 9.5% (+16.1)#83 8.8% (+16.8)#3,086
84. Vanceboro 25.5% 9.5% (+16.0)#84 8.8% (+16.7)#3,114
85. Arrowhead Beach 25.5% 9.5% (+16.0)#85 8.8% (+16.7)#3,118
86. Ansonville 25.4% 9.5% (+15.9)#86 8.8% (+16.7)#3,135
87. St Pauls 25.4% 9.5% (+15.9)#87 8.8% (+16.6)#3,144
88. Rocky Point 25.2% 9.5% (+15.7)#88 8.8% (+16.4)#3,171
89. Weldon 25.0% 9.5% (+15.5)#89 8.8% (+16.2)#3,199
90. Vandemere 25.0% 9.5% (+15.5)#90 8.8% (+16.2)#3,226
91. Kinston 25.0% 9.5% (+15.5)#91 8.8% (+16.2)#3,272
92. East Rockingham 24.9% 9.5% (+15.4)#92 8.8% (+16.1)#3,279
93. Hertford 24.8% 9.5% (+15.3)#93 8.8% (+16.0)#3,293
94. Candor 24.8% 9.5% (+15.3)#94 8.8% (+16.0)#3,302
95. Dana 24.7% 9.5% (+15.2)#95 8.8% (+15.9)#3,309
96. Faison 24.5% 9.5% (+15.0)#96 8.8% (+15.8)#3,349
97. Hot Springs 24.5% 9.5% (+15.0)#97 8.8% (+15.8)#3,350
98. Dobbins Heights 24.5% 9.5% (+15.0)#98 8.8% (+15.7)#3,359
99. Winton 24.5% 9.5% (+15.0)#99 8.8% (+15.7)#3,371
100. Siler City 24.3% 9.5% (+14.8)#100 8.8% (+15.5)#3,422

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in North Carolina are:
#1
84.1%
#2
72.5%
#3
62.7%
#4
58.0%
#5
55.4%
#6
54.3%
#7
51.8%
#8
51.5%
#9
50.0%
#10
50.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in North Carolina?
Brunswick has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in North Carolina with 84.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the State of North Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Families in North Carolina is 9.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Families in the United States is 8.8%.