Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Family Poverty
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Oklahoma

City Family Poverty vs State vs National
1. Oak Hill-Piney 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#35
2. Shamrock 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#2 8.8% (+91.2)#92
3. Piney 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#3 8.8% (+91.2)#111
4. Jefferson 100.0% 11.0% (+89.0)#4 8.8% (+91.2)#118
5. Mulberry 93.8% 11.0% (+82.7)#5 8.8% (+85.0)#127
6. Rosston 77.8% 11.0% (+66.8)#6 8.8% (+69.0)#181
7. Butler 66.7% 11.0% (+55.7)#7 8.8% (+57.9)#270
8. Bradley 66.7% 11.0% (+55.7)#8 8.8% (+57.9)#271
9. Elohim 66.7% 11.0% (+55.7)#9 8.8% (+57.9)#279
10. Deer Lick 64.7% 11.0% (+53.7)#10 8.8% (+55.9)#302
11. Badger Lee 64.7% 11.0% (+53.7)#11 8.8% (+55.9)#304
12. Bee 64.3% 11.0% (+53.3)#12 8.8% (+55.5)#314
13. Platter 62.8% 11.0% (+51.8)#13 8.8% (+54.0)#342
14. Grand Lake Towne 61.7% 11.0% (+50.7)#14 8.8% (+52.9)#360
15. Slick 61.5% 11.0% (+50.5)#15 8.8% (+52.8)#364
16. Tenkiller 61.1% 11.0% (+50.1)#16 8.8% (+52.3)#367
17. Fitzhugh 58.6% 11.0% (+47.5)#17 8.8% (+49.8)#415
18. Rosedale 57.1% 11.0% (+46.1)#18 8.8% (+48.4)#444
19. Bowring 55.6% 11.0% (+44.5)#19 8.8% (+46.8)#483
20. Skedee 55.6% 11.0% (+44.5)#20 8.8% (+46.8)#485
21. Tyrone 53.9% 11.0% (+42.9)#21 8.8% (+45.1)#530
22. Elm Grove 50.0% 11.0% (+39.0)#22 8.8% (+41.2)#649
23. Yeager 50.0% 11.0% (+39.0)#23 8.8% (+41.2)#652
24. Moyers 50.0% 11.0% (+39.0)#24 8.8% (+41.2)#653
25. Dripping Springs 50.0% 11.0% (+39.0)#25 8.8% (+41.2)#671
26. Langston 48.6% 11.0% (+37.6)#26 8.8% (+39.8)#723
27. Warwick 48.5% 11.0% (+37.5)#27 8.8% (+39.7)#728
28. Boswell 48.2% 11.0% (+37.2)#28 8.8% (+39.4)#736
29. Mutual 44.4% 11.0% (+33.4)#29 8.8% (+35.7)#912
30. Tushka 43.7% 11.0% (+32.7)#30 8.8% (+34.9)#944
31. Blue 42.9% 11.0% (+31.8)#31 8.8% (+34.1)#1,007
32. Monroe 41.9% 11.0% (+30.9)#32 8.8% (+33.2)#1,057
33. Reydon 41.3% 11.0% (+30.3)#33 8.8% (+32.5)#1,115
34. Mcbride 40.7% 11.0% (+29.7)#34 8.8% (+32.0)#1,159
35. Bennington 40.0% 11.0% (+29.0)#35 8.8% (+31.2)#1,199
36. Gowen 40.0% 11.0% (+29.0)#36 8.8% (+31.2)#1,202
37. Lima 40.0% 11.0% (+29.0)#37 8.8% (+31.2)#1,209
38. White Eagle 39.5% 11.0% (+28.5)#38 8.8% (+30.8)#1,243
39. Belfonte 39.0% 11.0% (+28.0)#39 8.8% (+30.2)#1,286
40. Nicut 38.3% 11.0% (+27.3)#40 8.8% (+29.5)#1,335
41. Nescatunga 37.5% 11.0% (+26.5)#41 8.8% (+28.7)#1,384
42. Baker 37.5% 11.0% (+26.5)#42 8.8% (+28.7)#1,387
43. Moffett 37.5% 11.0% (+26.5)#43 8.8% (+28.7)#1,389
44. Loco 36.8% 11.0% (+25.8)#44 8.8% (+28.1)#1,442
45. Heavener 36.7% 11.0% (+25.7)#45 8.8% (+27.9)#1,449
46. Mccurtain 36.4% 11.0% (+25.4)#46 8.8% (+27.6)#1,474
47. Hodgen 36.4% 11.0% (+25.4)#47 8.8% (+27.6)#1,481
48. Depew 36.1% 11.0% (+25.1)#48 8.8% (+27.3)#1,500
49. Weleetka 35.2% 11.0% (+24.2)#49 8.8% (+26.4)#1,592
50. Devol 35.1% 11.0% (+24.1)#50 8.8% (+26.4)#1,597
51. Carmen 35.0% 11.0% (+24.0)#51 8.8% (+26.2)#1,609
52. Taft 34.8% 11.0% (+23.8)#52 8.8% (+26.0)#1,630
53. Okemah 34.7% 11.0% (+23.7)#53 8.8% (+25.9)#1,638
54. Spavinaw 34.5% 11.0% (+23.5)#54 8.8% (+25.7)#1,654
55. Old Green 34.4% 11.0% (+23.4)#55 8.8% (+25.6)#1,673
56. Crowder 34.3% 11.0% (+23.3)#56 8.8% (+25.5)#1,685
57. Taloga 33.9% 11.0% (+22.9)#57 8.8% (+25.1)#1,718
58. Lexington 33.7% 11.0% (+22.7)#58 8.8% (+24.9)#1,747
59. Tishomingo 33.3% 11.0% (+22.3)#59 8.8% (+24.6)#1,764
60. Little Rock 33.3% 11.0% (+22.3)#60 8.8% (+24.6)#1,793
61. Lawrence Creek 33.3% 11.0% (+22.3)#61 8.8% (+24.6)#1,804
62. Ratliff City 33.3% 11.0% (+22.3)#62 8.8% (+24.6)#1,805
63. Bunch 33.3% 11.0% (+22.3)#63 8.8% (+24.6)#1,823
64. Douglas 33.3% 11.0% (+22.3)#64 8.8% (+24.6)#1,825
65. Amorita 33.3% 11.0% (+22.3)#65 8.8% (+24.6)#1,827
66. Avard 33.3% 11.0% (+22.3)#66 8.8% (+24.6)#1,832
67. Yale 32.8% 11.0% (+21.8)#67 8.8% (+24.0)#1,856
68. Hobart 32.3% 11.0% (+21.3)#68 8.8% (+23.5)#1,906
69. Martha 32.1% 11.0% (+21.1)#69 8.8% (+23.4)#1,916
70. Greenfield 32.1% 11.0% (+21.1)#70 8.8% (+23.4)#1,917
71. Keys 31.8% 11.0% (+20.7)#71 8.8% (+23.0)#1,965
72. Bache 31.6% 11.0% (+20.6)#72 8.8% (+22.8)#1,996
73. Commerce 31.5% 11.0% (+20.4)#73 8.8% (+22.7)#2,006
74. Ames 31.1% 11.0% (+20.1)#74 8.8% (+22.3)#2,059
75. Osage 30.8% 11.0% (+19.8)#75 8.8% (+22.0)#2,108
76. Tonkawa Tribal Housing 30.6% 11.0% (+19.6)#76 8.8% (+21.8)#2,131
77. Wapanucka 30.5% 11.0% (+19.5)#77 8.8% (+21.7)#2,148
78. Wewoka 30.2% 11.0% (+19.2)#78 8.8% (+21.5)#2,187
79. Indianola 30.0% 11.0% (+19.0)#79 8.8% (+21.2)#2,232
80. Allen 29.9% 11.0% (+18.9)#80 8.8% (+21.1)#2,260
81. Loyal 29.6% 11.0% (+18.6)#81 8.8% (+20.8)#2,290
82. Dustin 29.6% 11.0% (+18.6)#82 8.8% (+20.8)#2,299
83. Pumpkin Hollow 29.4% 11.0% (+18.4)#83 8.8% (+20.6)#2,325
84. Hitchita 29.4% 11.0% (+18.4)#84 8.8% (+20.6)#2,327
85. Sallisaw 28.8% 11.0% (+17.8)#85 8.8% (+20.0)#2,411
86. Broken Bow 28.8% 11.0% (+17.8)#86 8.8% (+20.0)#2,423
87. Whitesboro 28.6% 11.0% (+17.6)#87 8.8% (+19.8)#2,459
88. Cowlington 28.6% 11.0% (+17.6)#88 8.8% (+19.8)#2,462
89. Salina 28.5% 11.0% (+17.5)#89 8.8% (+19.7)#2,483
90. Bell 28.3% 11.0% (+17.3)#90 8.8% (+19.6)#2,504
91. Colcord 28.2% 11.0% (+17.2)#91 8.8% (+19.4)#2,533
92. Canadian Shores 28.1% 11.0% (+17.1)#92 8.8% (+19.3)#2,544
93. Watts 28.0% 11.0% (+17.0)#93 8.8% (+19.2)#2,565
94. Quinton 27.9% 11.0% (+16.9)#94 8.8% (+19.1)#2,591
95. Carlisle 27.8% 11.0% (+16.8)#95 8.8% (+19.0)#2,606
96. Seminole 27.7% 11.0% (+16.7)#96 8.8% (+19.0)#2,625
97. Hugo 27.7% 11.0% (+16.7)#97 8.8% (+18.9)#2,629
98. Ryan 27.6% 11.0% (+16.6)#98 8.8% (+18.9)#2,640
99. Marshall 27.3% 11.0% (+16.3)#99 8.8% (+18.5)#2,712
100. Lamont 27.3% 11.0% (+16.3)#100 8.8% (+18.5)#2,716

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
93.8%
#5
77.8%
#6
66.7%
#7
66.7%
#8
64.7%
#9
64.7%
#10
64.3%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Oklahoma?
Shamrock has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the State of Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Families in Oklahoma is 11.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Families in the United States is 8.8%.