Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Mississippi

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Family Poverty
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Mississippi
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Mississippi

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Mississippi Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Mississippi

City Family Poverty vs State vs National
1. Symonds 100.0% 14.4% (+85.6)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#107
2. Glendora 87.5% 14.4% (+73.1)#2 8.8% (+78.7)#140
3. Glen Allan 85.0% 14.4% (+70.6)#3 8.8% (+76.2)#146
4. Bethlehem 82.9% 14.4% (+68.5)#4 8.8% (+74.1)#154
5. White Oak 78.8% 14.4% (+64.4)#5 8.8% (+70.0)#175
6. Harperville 71.0% 14.4% (+56.6)#6 8.8% (+62.2)#237
7. Doddsville 66.7% 14.4% (+52.3)#7 8.8% (+57.9)#269
8. De Soto 61.1% 14.4% (+46.7)#8 8.8% (+52.3)#368
9. Foxworth 59.1% 14.4% (+44.6)#9 8.8% (+50.3)#403
10. Gunnison 57.4% 14.4% (+43.0)#10 8.8% (+48.6)#433
11. Wade 54.6% 14.4% (+40.2)#11 8.8% (+45.8)#508
12. Friars Point 54.4% 14.4% (+40.0)#12 8.8% (+45.6)#518
13. Tucker 53.6% 14.4% (+39.2)#13 8.8% (+44.8)#538
14. Morgan City 53.3% 14.4% (+38.9)#14 8.8% (+44.6)#541
15. Jonestown 53.3% 14.4% (+38.9)#15 8.8% (+44.5)#546
16. Renova 51.4% 14.4% (+37.0)#16 8.8% (+42.6)#608
17. Winterville 50.0% 14.4% (+35.6)#17 8.8% (+41.2)#656
18. Rosedale 49.8% 14.4% (+35.4)#18 8.8% (+41.0)#685
19. Goodman 49.1% 14.4% (+34.7)#19 8.8% (+40.3)#706
20. Fayette 48.7% 14.4% (+34.3)#20 8.8% (+39.9)#721
21. Eden 47.5% 14.4% (+33.1)#21 8.8% (+38.7)#778
22. Arcola 47.5% 14.4% (+33.1)#22 8.8% (+38.7)#779
23. Alligator 47.4% 14.4% (+33.0)#23 8.8% (+38.6)#782
24. Vaiden 45.9% 14.4% (+31.5)#24 8.8% (+37.1)#833
25. Bude 45.3% 14.4% (+30.9)#25 8.8% (+36.6)#862
26. Bond 45.3% 14.4% (+30.9)#26 8.8% (+36.6)#863
27. Scooba 45.2% 14.4% (+30.8)#27 8.8% (+36.4)#867
28. Arnold Line 44.8% 14.4% (+30.4)#28 8.8% (+36.0)#886
29. North Carrollton 43.6% 14.4% (+29.2)#29 8.8% (+34.8)#952
30. Crosby 42.9% 14.4% (+28.5)#30 8.8% (+34.1)#1,001
31. Shaw 41.7% 14.4% (+27.3)#31 8.8% (+33.0)#1,074
32. Sunflower 41.6% 14.4% (+27.2)#32 8.8% (+32.8)#1,092
33. Port Gibson 41.5% 14.4% (+27.1)#33 8.8% (+32.7)#1,094
34. Nellieburg 41.4% 14.4% (+27.0)#34 8.8% (+32.6)#1,107
35. Mound Bayou 41.2% 14.4% (+26.8)#35 8.8% (+32.4)#1,120
36. Bovina 40.9% 14.4% (+26.5)#36 8.8% (+32.1)#1,145
37. Beaumont 40.4% 14.4% (+26.0)#37 8.8% (+31.6)#1,178
38. New Augusta 40.3% 14.4% (+25.9)#38 8.8% (+31.5)#1,185
39. Charleston 38.7% 14.4% (+24.3)#39 8.8% (+29.9)#1,311
40. Silver Creek 38.6% 14.4% (+24.2)#40 8.8% (+29.9)#1,313
41. Artesia 38.2% 14.4% (+23.8)#41 8.8% (+29.5)#1,337
42. Coahoma 38.1% 14.4% (+23.7)#42 8.8% (+29.3)#1,344
43. Conehatta 37.9% 14.4% (+23.5)#43 8.8% (+29.1)#1,359
44. Paris 37.5% 14.4% (+23.1)#44 8.8% (+28.7)#1,378
45. Weir 37.0% 14.4% (+22.6)#45 8.8% (+28.2)#1,426
46. Macon 36.6% 14.4% (+22.2)#46 8.8% (+27.8)#1,460
47. Shelby 36.5% 14.4% (+22.1)#47 8.8% (+27.7)#1,463
48. Moorhead 36.3% 14.4% (+21.9)#48 8.8% (+27.5)#1,490
49. Crowder 36.1% 14.4% (+21.7)#49 8.8% (+27.3)#1,498
50. Braxton 36.0% 14.4% (+21.6)#50 8.8% (+27.2)#1,507
51. Yazoo City 35.7% 14.4% (+21.3)#51 8.8% (+26.9)#1,530
52. Benoit 35.5% 14.4% (+21.1)#52 8.8% (+26.8)#1,553
53. Ethel 35.4% 14.4% (+21.0)#53 8.8% (+26.7)#1,561
54. Cruger 35.4% 14.4% (+21.0)#54 8.8% (+26.6)#1,565
55. Decatur 35.2% 14.4% (+20.8)#55 8.8% (+26.4)#1,589
56. Utica 35.1% 14.4% (+20.7)#56 8.8% (+26.3)#1,599
57. Anguilla 35.1% 14.4% (+20.7)#57 8.8% (+26.3)#1,600
58. Roxie 35.0% 14.4% (+20.6)#58 8.8% (+26.3)#1,603
59. Potts Camp 34.8% 14.4% (+20.4)#59 8.8% (+26.0)#1,623
60. Brooksville 34.8% 14.4% (+20.4)#60 8.8% (+26.0)#1,626
61. Louisville 34.3% 14.4% (+19.9)#61 8.8% (+25.5)#1,682
62. Georgetown 34.0% 14.4% (+19.6)#62 8.8% (+25.2)#1,710
63. Okolona 33.7% 14.4% (+19.3)#63 8.8% (+24.9)#1,748
64. Webb 33.7% 14.4% (+19.3)#64 8.8% (+24.9)#1,749
65. Drew 33.4% 14.4% (+19.0)#65 8.8% (+24.6)#1,762
66. Gattman 33.3% 14.4% (+18.9)#66 8.8% (+24.6)#1,795
67. Morton 32.8% 14.4% (+18.4)#67 8.8% (+24.0)#1,854
68. Houston 32.8% 14.4% (+18.4)#68 8.8% (+24.0)#1,860
69. Centreville 32.8% 14.4% (+18.4)#69 8.8% (+24.0)#1,861
70. Hollandale 32.7% 14.4% (+18.3)#70 8.8% (+23.9)#1,866
71. Itta Bena 31.9% 14.4% (+17.5)#71 8.8% (+23.1)#1,943
72. Tchula 31.8% 14.4% (+17.4)#72 8.8% (+23.0)#1,960
73. Clarksdale 31.5% 14.4% (+17.1)#73 8.8% (+22.8)#1,997
74. Union 31.4% 14.4% (+17.0)#74 8.8% (+22.6)#2,015
75. Durant 31.2% 14.4% (+16.8)#75 8.8% (+22.4)#2,046
76. Gloster 31.1% 14.4% (+16.7)#76 8.8% (+22.3)#2,056
77. West Hattiesburg 30.9% 14.4% (+16.5)#77 8.8% (+22.1)#2,081
78. Redwater 30.9% 14.4% (+16.5)#78 8.8% (+22.1)#2,090
79. Winona 30.8% 14.4% (+16.4)#79 8.8% (+22.0)#2,102
80. Pearl River 30.5% 14.4% (+16.0)#80 8.8% (+21.7)#2,153
81. Natchez 30.4% 14.4% (+16.0)#81 8.8% (+21.6)#2,159
82. Isola 30.4% 14.4% (+16.0)#82 8.8% (+21.6)#2,162
83. Walls 30.1% 14.4% (+15.7)#83 8.8% (+21.3)#2,212
84. Hickory 30.0% 14.4% (+15.6)#84 8.8% (+21.2)#2,222
85. Hamilton 29.6% 14.4% (+15.2)#85 8.8% (+20.8)#2,286
86. Hazlehurst 29.6% 14.4% (+15.2)#86 8.8% (+20.8)#2,301
87. Lucedale 29.2% 14.4% (+14.8)#87 8.8% (+20.4)#2,348
88. Mccomb 29.1% 14.4% (+14.7)#88 8.8% (+20.3)#2,368
89. Walnut Grove 29.0% 14.4% (+14.6)#89 8.8% (+20.3)#2,377
90. Shuqualak 28.8% 14.4% (+14.4)#90 8.8% (+20.0)#2,425
91. Flora 28.6% 14.4% (+14.2)#91 8.8% (+19.9)#2,440
92. Summit 28.2% 14.4% (+13.8)#92 8.8% (+19.5)#2,523
93. Big Creek 28.2% 14.4% (+13.8)#93 8.8% (+19.4)#2,530
94. Courtland 28.1% 14.4% (+13.7)#94 8.8% (+19.4)#2,539
95. Magnolia 28.1% 14.4% (+13.7)#95 8.8% (+19.4)#2,542
96. Mccool 27.8% 14.4% (+13.4)#96 8.8% (+19.0)#2,621
97. Picayune 27.6% 14.4% (+13.2)#97 8.8% (+18.8)#2,654
98. Agricola 27.2% 14.4% (+12.7)#98 8.8% (+18.4)#2,738
99. Plantersville 27.0% 14.4% (+12.6)#99 8.8% (+18.2)#2,773
100. Bruce 26.8% 14.4% (+12.4)#100 8.8% (+18.0)#2,812

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Mississippi?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Mississippi are:
#1
87.5%
#2
78.8%
#3
66.7%
#4
59.1%
#5
57.4%
#6
54.6%
#7
54.4%
#8
53.6%
#9
53.3%
#10
53.3%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Mississippi?
Glendora has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Mississippi with 87.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the State of Mississippi?
Poverty Level Among Families in Mississippi is 14.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Families in the United States is 8.8%.