Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Indiana

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Family Poverty
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Indiana
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Indiana

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Indiana Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Indiana

City Family Poverty vs State vs National
1. Notre Dame 100.0% 8.5% (+91.5)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#1
2. Millville 100.0% 8.5% (+91.5)#2 8.8% (+91.2)#24
3. Centerton 100.0% 8.5% (+91.5)#3 8.8% (+91.2)#25
4. Pence 100.0% 8.5% (+91.5)#4 8.8% (+91.2)#30
5. Grayford 100.0% 8.5% (+91.5)#5 8.8% (+91.2)#41
6. Linn Grove 100.0% 8.5% (+91.5)#6 8.8% (+91.2)#44
7. Otisco 100.0% 8.5% (+91.5)#7 8.8% (+91.2)#48
8. Penntown 100.0% 8.5% (+91.5)#8 8.8% (+91.2)#65
9. Lake View 100.0% 8.5% (+91.5)#9 8.8% (+91.2)#66
10. Burney 100.0% 8.5% (+91.5)#10 8.8% (+91.2)#104
11. Lewis 93.0% 8.5% (+84.5)#11 8.8% (+84.2)#128
12. Hartz Lake 69.7% 8.5% (+61.2)#12 8.8% (+60.9)#244
13. Azalia 67.4% 8.5% (+58.9)#13 8.8% (+58.6)#261
14. Alamo 66.7% 8.5% (+58.2)#14 8.8% (+57.9)#275
15. Eugene 63.6% 8.5% (+55.2)#15 8.8% (+54.9)#329
16. Williams 58.3% 8.5% (+49.9)#16 8.8% (+49.6)#419
17. Adams 57.4% 8.5% (+49.0)#17 8.8% (+48.7)#432
18. Butlerville 57.4% 8.5% (+48.9)#18 8.8% (+48.6)#435
19. Hobbs 55.2% 8.5% (+46.7)#19 8.8% (+46.4)#498
20. Montmorenci 52.3% 8.5% (+43.8)#20 8.8% (+43.5)#577
21. Hardinsburg 51.9% 8.5% (+43.4)#21 8.8% (+43.1)#593
22. Prairie Creek 47.5% 8.5% (+39.1)#22 8.8% (+38.8)#773
23. Lake Cicott 47.1% 8.5% (+38.6)#23 8.8% (+38.3)#796
24. Arthur 46.9% 8.5% (+38.4)#24 8.8% (+38.1)#801
25. Hanna 45.0% 8.5% (+36.6)#25 8.8% (+36.3)#877
26. Mauckport 44.4% 8.5% (+36.0)#26 8.8% (+35.7)#910
27. Young America 43.1% 8.5% (+34.6)#27 8.8% (+34.3)#988
28. Deer Creek 41.5% 8.5% (+33.0)#28 8.8% (+32.7)#1,101
29. Cates 41.2% 8.5% (+32.7)#29 8.8% (+32.4)#1,127
30. Laconia 41.2% 8.5% (+32.7)#30 8.8% (+32.4)#1,130
31. Marion 41.1% 8.5% (+32.6)#31 8.8% (+32.3)#1,137
32. Boston 37.7% 8.5% (+29.2)#32 8.8% (+28.9)#1,370
33. Servia 37.5% 8.5% (+29.0)#33 8.8% (+28.7)#1,376
34. Brimfield 37.3% 8.5% (+28.9)#34 8.8% (+28.6)#1,402
35. Laurel 36.9% 8.5% (+28.4)#35 8.8% (+28.1)#1,435
36. Spring Grove 35.2% 8.5% (+26.8)#36 8.8% (+26.5)#1,587
37. Redkey 34.9% 8.5% (+26.4)#37 8.8% (+26.1)#1,618
38. English 34.5% 8.5% (+26.0)#38 8.8% (+25.7)#1,652
39. St Mary Of The Woods 34.4% 8.5% (+25.9)#39 8.8% (+25.6)#1,668
40. Ambia 34.0% 8.5% (+25.6)#40 8.8% (+25.3)#1,706
41. Crandall 33.9% 8.5% (+25.4)#41 8.8% (+25.1)#1,720
42. Florence 33.3% 8.5% (+24.9)#42 8.8% (+24.6)#1,809
43. Billtown 32.6% 8.5% (+24.1)#43 8.8% (+23.8)#1,873
44. Nyona Lake 32.4% 8.5% (+24.0)#44 8.8% (+23.7)#1,896
45. Cross Plains 32.3% 8.5% (+23.8)#45 8.8% (+23.5)#1,908
46. St. Omer 32.1% 8.5% (+23.7)#46 8.8% (+23.4)#1,918
47. Amity 31.9% 8.5% (+23.4)#47 8.8% (+23.1)#1,945
48. Coal 30.8% 8.5% (+22.3)#48 8.8% (+22.0)#2,111
49. Otwell 30.7% 8.5% (+22.2)#49 8.8% (+21.9)#2,127
50. Boswell 29.9% 8.5% (+21.5)#50 8.8% (+21.2)#2,250
51. Switz City 29.0% 8.5% (+20.5)#51 8.8% (+20.2)#2,381
52. Burnett 28.8% 8.5% (+20.3)#52 8.8% (+20.0)#2,420
53. Merom 28.3% 8.5% (+19.8)#53 8.8% (+19.5)#2,518
54. Shelburn 28.3% 8.5% (+19.8)#54 8.8% (+19.5)#2,520
55. Gary 27.9% 8.5% (+19.4)#55 8.8% (+19.1)#2,583
56. Blairsville 27.9% 8.5% (+19.4)#56 8.8% (+19.1)#2,586
57. Williamsburg 27.8% 8.5% (+19.4)#57 8.8% (+19.1)#2,602
58. Prairieton 27.7% 8.5% (+19.2)#58 8.8% (+18.9)#2,635
59. Geneva 27.3% 8.5% (+18.8)#59 8.8% (+18.5)#2,714
60. Napoleon 27.1% 8.5% (+18.6)#60 8.8% (+18.3)#2,743
61. Knox 27.1% 8.5% (+18.6)#61 8.8% (+18.3)#2,752
62. Alford 27.0% 8.5% (+18.5)#62 8.8% (+18.2)#2,759
63. Jasonville 26.8% 8.5% (+18.3)#63 8.8% (+18.0)#2,810
64. Harrodsburg 26.1% 8.5% (+17.6)#64 8.8% (+17.3)#2,977
65. Larwill 26.0% 8.5% (+17.5)#65 8.8% (+17.2)#3,000
66. Staunton 26.0% 8.5% (+17.5)#66 8.8% (+17.2)#3,003
67. Worthington 25.8% 8.5% (+17.3)#67 8.8% (+17.0)#3,038
68. Campbellsburg 25.6% 8.5% (+17.1)#68 8.8% (+16.8)#3,095
69. New Salisbury 25.5% 8.5% (+17.0)#69 8.8% (+16.7)#3,111
70. Springport 25.0% 8.5% (+16.5)#70 8.8% (+16.2)#3,232
71. Willow Branch 25.0% 8.5% (+16.5)#71 8.8% (+16.2)#3,243
72. Scottsburg 24.9% 8.5% (+16.4)#72 8.8% (+16.1)#3,281
73. Bippus 24.4% 8.5% (+16.0)#73 8.8% (+15.7)#3,378
74. East Chicago 24.4% 8.5% (+15.9)#74 8.8% (+15.6)#3,404
75. Culver 24.3% 8.5% (+15.8)#75 8.8% (+15.5)#3,421
76. Grantsburg 23.8% 8.5% (+15.3)#76 8.8% (+15.0)#3,547
77. Monroe City 23.7% 8.5% (+15.2)#77 8.8% (+14.9)#3,580
78. Kempton 23.7% 8.5% (+15.2)#78 8.8% (+14.9)#3,590
79. Riley 23.5% 8.5% (+15.1)#79 8.8% (+14.7)#3,614
80. Pittsburg 23.5% 8.5% (+15.1)#80 8.8% (+14.7)#3,618
81. Van Buren 22.8% 8.5% (+14.4)#81 8.8% (+14.1)#3,802
82. New Pekin 22.5% 8.5% (+14.0)#82 8.8% (+13.7)#3,916
83. Fountain City 22.4% 8.5% (+13.9)#83 8.8% (+13.6)#3,953
84. Kewanna 22.1% 8.5% (+13.7)#84 8.8% (+13.4)#4,033
85. Roachdale 21.9% 8.5% (+13.4)#85 8.8% (+13.1)#4,135
86. Lewisville 21.8% 8.5% (+13.3)#86 8.8% (+13.0)#4,157
87. Peru 21.2% 8.5% (+12.7)#87 8.8% (+12.4)#4,374
88. Thayer 21.2% 8.5% (+12.7)#88 8.8% (+12.4)#4,380
89. Cannelton 21.0% 8.5% (+12.5)#89 8.8% (+12.2)#4,437
90. Wolflake 21.0% 8.5% (+12.5)#90 8.8% (+12.2)#4,449
91. Roseland 21.0% 8.5% (+12.5)#91 8.8% (+12.2)#4,461
92. Americus 21.0% 8.5% (+12.5)#92 8.8% (+12.2)#4,463
93. Cromwell 21.0% 8.5% (+12.5)#93 8.8% (+12.2)#4,464
94. Russellville 20.9% 8.5% (+12.4)#94 8.8% (+12.1)#4,482
95. Carlisle 20.8% 8.5% (+12.3)#95 8.8% (+12.0)#4,534
96. Kingsbury 20.5% 8.5% (+12.1)#96 8.8% (+11.8)#4,616
97. Dillsboro 20.5% 8.5% (+12.0)#97 8.8% (+11.7)#4,622
98. Webster 20.3% 8.5% (+11.8)#98 8.8% (+11.5)#4,710
99. Grissom Afb 20.0% 8.5% (+11.6)#99 8.8% (+11.3)#4,802
100. Leiters Ford 20.0% 8.5% (+11.5)#100 8.8% (+11.2)#4,832

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Indiana?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Indiana are:
#1
100.0%
#2
66.7%
#3
58.3%
#4
57.4%
#5
52.3%
#6
51.9%
#7
45.0%
#8
44.4%
#9
41.2%
#10
41.1%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Indiana?
Notre Dame has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Indiana with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the State of Indiana?
Poverty Level Among Families in Indiana is 8.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Families in the United States is 8.8%.