Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Family Poverty
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in South Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in South Dakota

City Family Poverty vs State vs National
1. Manderson White Horse Creek 100.0% 7.5% (+92.5)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#4
2. Wounded Knee 100.0% 7.5% (+92.5)#2 8.8% (+91.2)#8
3. Long Hollow 100.0% 7.5% (+92.5)#3 8.8% (+91.2)#9
4. Swift Bird 100.0% 7.5% (+92.5)#4 8.8% (+91.2)#26
5. Mayfield Colony 100.0% 7.5% (+92.5)#5 8.8% (+91.2)#78
6. Shamrock Colony 100.0% 7.5% (+92.5)#6 8.8% (+91.2)#82
7. Onaka 100.0% 7.5% (+92.5)#7 8.8% (+91.2)#112
8. Corn Creek 90.6% 7.5% (+83.1)#8 8.8% (+81.8)#134
9. Bridger 89.5% 7.5% (+81.9)#9 8.8% (+80.7)#135
10. Norris 88.9% 7.5% (+81.4)#10 8.8% (+80.1)#137
11. Marty 87.0% 7.5% (+79.4)#11 8.8% (+78.2)#143
12. Porcupine 76.6% 7.5% (+69.1)#12 8.8% (+67.8)#189
13. Little Eagle 75.9% 7.5% (+68.3)#13 8.8% (+67.1)#194
14. Wakpala 75.6% 7.5% (+68.1)#14 8.8% (+66.8)#196
15. Clark Colony 73.3% 7.5% (+65.8)#15 8.8% (+64.6)#215
16. Okreek 71.4% 7.5% (+63.9)#16 8.8% (+62.6)#230
17. La Plant 69.6% 7.5% (+62.0)#17 8.8% (+60.8)#247
18. Batesland 68.2% 7.5% (+60.7)#18 8.8% (+59.4)#257
19. Horse Creek 66.7% 7.5% (+59.1)#19 8.8% (+57.9)#268
20. Antelope 64.6% 7.5% (+57.1)#20 8.8% (+55.8)#305
21. Parmelee 63.5% 7.5% (+56.0)#21 8.8% (+54.7)#333
22. Kyle 62.7% 7.5% (+55.2)#22 8.8% (+53.9)#344
23. Sicangu 62.0% 7.5% (+54.5)#23 8.8% (+53.2)#354
24. Bullhead 61.5% 7.5% (+54.0)#24 8.8% (+52.8)#363
25. Wanblee 61.1% 7.5% (+53.6)#25 8.8% (+52.3)#366
26. Soldier Creek 61.0% 7.5% (+53.5)#26 8.8% (+52.2)#371
27. Two Strike 58.7% 7.5% (+51.1)#27 8.8% (+49.9)#411
28. West Brule 57.1% 7.5% (+49.6)#28 8.8% (+48.4)#439
29. Allen 54.3% 7.5% (+46.7)#29 8.8% (+45.5)#522
30. Cherry Creek 53.8% 7.5% (+46.3)#30 8.8% (+45.1)#532
31. Lower Brule 52.1% 7.5% (+44.6)#31 8.8% (+43.4)#583
32. Oglala 48.2% 7.5% (+40.6)#32 8.8% (+39.4)#738
33. Enemy Swim 46.7% 7.5% (+39.1)#33 8.8% (+37.9)#810
34. Rosebud 45.7% 7.5% (+38.2)#34 8.8% (+36.9)#841
35. Mission 44.7% 7.5% (+37.2)#35 8.8% (+36.0)#888
36. Fort Thompson 42.9% 7.5% (+35.4)#36 8.8% (+34.1)#995
37. Wood 42.9% 7.5% (+35.3)#37 8.8% (+34.1)#1,009
38. Peever Flats 41.4% 7.5% (+33.9)#38 8.8% (+32.6)#1,109
39. Pine Ridge 38.7% 7.5% (+31.2)#39 8.8% (+29.9)#1,308
40. Spring Creek 38.5% 7.5% (+30.9)#40 8.8% (+29.7)#1,325
41. Interior 38.5% 7.5% (+30.9)#41 8.8% (+29.7)#1,328
42. North Eagle Butte 37.0% 7.5% (+29.5)#42 8.8% (+28.2)#1,425
43. Peever 36.7% 7.5% (+29.1)#43 8.8% (+27.9)#1,453
44. St Francis 36.0% 7.5% (+28.4)#44 8.8% (+27.2)#1,509
45. Richland 35.7% 7.5% (+28.2)#45 8.8% (+26.9)#1,535
46. Agency Village 34.4% 7.5% (+26.8)#46 8.8% (+25.6)#1,670
47. Fairburn 33.3% 7.5% (+25.8)#47 8.8% (+24.6)#1,822
48. Dupree 33.0% 7.5% (+25.5)#48 8.8% (+24.2)#1,849
49. Colome 31.7% 7.5% (+24.2)#49 8.8% (+22.9)#1,966
50. Vale 31.2% 7.5% (+23.7)#50 8.8% (+22.5)#2,037
51. Whitehorse 29.4% 7.5% (+21.9)#51 8.8% (+20.6)#2,321
52. Wessington 27.8% 7.5% (+20.3)#52 8.8% (+19.0)#2,615
53. Eagle Butte 27.4% 7.5% (+19.9)#53 8.8% (+18.6)#2,685
54. Aurora Center 26.7% 7.5% (+19.1)#54 8.8% (+17.9)#2,839
55. White River 26.0% 7.5% (+18.5)#55 8.8% (+17.2)#2,995
56. Fairfax 25.0% 7.5% (+17.5)#56 8.8% (+16.2)#3,241
57. New Witten 25.0% 7.5% (+17.5)#57 8.8% (+16.2)#3,249
58. Marvin 25.0% 7.5% (+17.5)#58 8.8% (+16.2)#3,268
59. Hot Springs 23.9% 7.5% (+16.4)#59 8.8% (+15.1)#3,520
60. Glendale Colony 23.5% 7.5% (+16.0)#60 8.8% (+14.7)#3,617
61. Ashland Heights 23.3% 7.5% (+15.8)#61 8.8% (+14.6)#3,667
62. Conde 23.3% 7.5% (+15.8)#62 8.8% (+14.6)#3,674
63. Ravinia 23.1% 7.5% (+15.6)#63 8.8% (+14.3)#3,749
64. Davis 22.6% 7.5% (+15.1)#64 8.8% (+13.8)#3,893
65. Fruitdale 22.2% 7.5% (+14.7)#65 8.8% (+13.4)#4,007
66. Vivian 22.2% 7.5% (+14.7)#66 8.8% (+13.4)#4,016
67. Sisseton 21.9% 7.5% (+14.4)#67 8.8% (+13.1)#4,114
68. Winner 21.7% 7.5% (+14.2)#68 8.8% (+12.9)#4,182
69. Lake Andes 21.4% 7.5% (+13.8)#69 8.8% (+12.6)#4,306
70. Brandt 21.2% 7.5% (+13.7)#70 8.8% (+12.4)#4,365
71. Burke 20.4% 7.5% (+12.9)#71 8.8% (+11.6)#4,661
72. Bryant 20.4% 7.5% (+12.9)#72 8.8% (+11.6)#4,668
73. New Effington 20.0% 7.5% (+12.5)#73 8.8% (+11.2)#4,842
74. Pierpont 20.0% 7.5% (+12.5)#74 8.8% (+11.2)#4,859
75. Agar 20.0% 7.5% (+12.5)#75 8.8% (+11.2)#4,867
76. Lemmon 19.2% 7.5% (+11.7)#76 8.8% (+10.5)#5,147
77. Philip 19.1% 7.5% (+11.6)#77 8.8% (+10.3)#5,199
78. Platte 18.8% 7.5% (+11.3)#78 8.8% (+10.0)#5,336
79. Morristown 18.8% 7.5% (+11.2)#79 8.8% (+9.97)#5,386
80. Eureka 18.2% 7.5% (+10.7)#80 8.8% (+9.45)#5,645
81. Naples 18.2% 7.5% (+10.7)#81 8.8% (+9.40)#5,685
82. Edgemont 17.6% 7.5% (+10.1)#82 8.8% (+8.87)#5,932
83. Oelrichs 16.7% 7.5% (+9.14)#83 8.8% (+7.88)#6,465
84. Revillo 16.7% 7.5% (+9.14)#84 8.8% (+7.88)#6,481
85. Belvidere 16.7% 7.5% (+9.14)#85 8.8% (+7.88)#6,485
86. Viborg 16.2% 7.5% (+8.64)#86 8.8% (+7.39)#6,738
87. Vienna 15.8% 7.5% (+8.26)#87 8.8% (+7.01)#6,952
88. Monroe 15.7% 7.5% (+8.16)#88 8.8% (+6.90)#7,008
89. Chancellor 15.6% 7.5% (+8.03)#89 8.8% (+6.77)#7,090
90. Mclaughlin 15.5% 7.5% (+7.98)#90 8.8% (+6.72)#7,122
91. Lake City 15.4% 7.5% (+7.86)#91 8.8% (+6.60)#7,219
92. Elkton 15.2% 7.5% (+7.69)#92 8.8% (+6.44)#7,308
93. Green Valley 15.2% 7.5% (+7.66)#93 8.8% (+6.40)#7,329
94. Alcester 15.1% 7.5% (+7.57)#94 8.8% (+6.31)#7,386
95. Utica 15.0% 7.5% (+7.47)#95 8.8% (+6.22)#7,466
96. Delmont 14.8% 7.5% (+7.29)#96 8.8% (+6.03)#7,595
97. Avon 14.6% 7.5% (+7.11)#97 8.8% (+5.85)#7,702
98. Java 14.6% 7.5% (+7.06)#98 8.8% (+5.80)#7,744
99. Twin Brooks 14.3% 7.5% (+6.76)#99 8.8% (+5.50)#8,004
100. Armour 14.1% 7.5% (+6.58)#100 8.8% (+5.32)#8,117

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in South Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
90.6%
#6
88.9%
#7
87.0%
#8
76.6%
#9
75.9%
#10
71.4%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in South Dakota?
Manderson White Horse Creek has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in South Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the State of South Dakota?
Poverty Level Among Families in South Dakota is 7.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Families in the United States is 8.8%.