Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in South Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Family Poverty
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in South Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in South Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in South Carolina

City Family Poverty vs State vs National
1. Rains 100.0% 10.2% (+89.8)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#52
2. Willington 100.0% 10.2% (+89.8)#2 8.8% (+91.2)#58
3. Bradley 83.9% 10.2% (+73.7)#3 8.8% (+75.1)#150
4. Sellers 63.6% 10.2% (+53.4)#4 8.8% (+54.9)#330
5. Cash 61.8% 10.2% (+51.6)#5 8.8% (+53.1)#358
6. Alcolu 60.5% 10.2% (+50.3)#6 8.8% (+51.7)#376
7. Zion 59.5% 10.2% (+49.3)#7 8.8% (+50.7)#394
8. Little Rock 57.0% 10.2% (+46.9)#8 8.8% (+48.3)#446
9. Manville 52.7% 10.2% (+42.5)#9 8.8% (+43.9)#560
10. Lynchburg 52.5% 10.2% (+42.3)#10 8.8% (+43.7)#570
11. Clifton 51.0% 10.2% (+40.8)#11 8.8% (+42.3)#617
12. Saluda 49.5% 10.2% (+39.3)#12 8.8% (+40.7)#691
13. Olympia 49.4% 10.2% (+39.2)#13 8.8% (+40.6)#699
14. Oswego 46.7% 10.2% (+36.5)#14 8.8% (+37.9)#809
15. Richburg 44.6% 10.2% (+34.4)#15 8.8% (+35.8)#893
16. Saxon 43.5% 10.2% (+33.3)#16 8.8% (+34.8)#957
17. Southern Shops 42.9% 10.2% (+32.7)#17 8.8% (+34.1)#996
18. Judson 42.6% 10.2% (+32.4)#18 8.8% (+33.8)#1,024
19. Buffalo 42.5% 10.2% (+32.3)#19 8.8% (+33.7)#1,028
20. Clarks Hill 41.7% 10.2% (+31.5)#20 8.8% (+32.9)#1,084
21. Williams 41.3% 10.2% (+31.1)#21 8.8% (+32.5)#1,114
22. Enoree 40.7% 10.2% (+30.5)#22 8.8% (+31.9)#1,160
23. City View 40.1% 10.2% (+29.9)#23 8.8% (+31.3)#1,197
24. Ware Shoals 39.9% 10.2% (+29.7)#24 8.8% (+31.1)#1,226
25. Glendale 39.4% 10.2% (+29.2)#25 8.8% (+30.6)#1,253
26. Allendale 39.1% 10.2% (+28.9)#26 8.8% (+30.3)#1,282
27. Jenkinsville 38.5% 10.2% (+28.3)#27 8.8% (+29.7)#1,327
28. Dillon 38.0% 10.2% (+27.8)#28 8.8% (+29.2)#1,349
29. Dovesville 38.0% 10.2% (+27.8)#29 8.8% (+29.2)#1,351
30. Whitmire 37.4% 10.2% (+27.2)#30 8.8% (+28.6)#1,397
31. Centenary 37.3% 10.2% (+27.1)#31 8.8% (+28.5)#1,404
32. Bethune 37.3% 10.2% (+27.1)#32 8.8% (+28.5)#1,407
33. Eastover 37.2% 10.2% (+27.0)#33 8.8% (+28.4)#1,416
34. Timmonsville 36.7% 10.2% (+26.5)#34 8.8% (+27.9)#1,450
35. Bamberg 36.2% 10.2% (+26.0)#35 8.8% (+27.4)#1,493
36. Ridgeway 35.9% 10.2% (+25.7)#36 8.8% (+27.1)#1,512
37. Scranton 35.9% 10.2% (+25.7)#37 8.8% (+27.1)#1,515
38. Eureka Mill 35.7% 10.2% (+25.5)#38 8.8% (+26.9)#1,529
39. Andrews 34.9% 10.2% (+24.7)#39 8.8% (+26.1)#1,617
40. Newry 34.6% 10.2% (+24.4)#40 8.8% (+25.8)#1,645
41. Estill 34.3% 10.2% (+24.1)#41 8.8% (+25.5)#1,679
42. Perry 33.8% 10.2% (+23.6)#42 8.8% (+25.0)#1,733
43. Salley 33.8% 10.2% (+23.6)#43 8.8% (+25.0)#1,735
44. Dale 33.6% 10.2% (+23.4)#44 8.8% (+24.9)#1,753
45. St Matthews 33.3% 10.2% (+23.1)#45 8.8% (+24.6)#1,765
46. St Stephen 33.3% 10.2% (+23.1)#46 8.8% (+24.6)#1,767
47. Waterloo 31.7% 10.2% (+21.5)#47 8.8% (+22.9)#1,982
48. Daviston 31.6% 10.2% (+21.4)#48 8.8% (+22.8)#1,991
49. Dunbar 31.5% 10.2% (+21.3)#49 8.8% (+22.7)#2,001
50. Santee 31.2% 10.2% (+21.0)#50 8.8% (+22.4)#2,048
51. Hamer 30.9% 10.2% (+20.7)#51 8.8% (+22.1)#2,086
52. Catawba 30.8% 10.2% (+20.6)#52 8.8% (+22.0)#2,096
53. Langley 30.8% 10.2% (+20.6)#53 8.8% (+22.0)#2,104
54. Irwin 30.7% 10.2% (+20.5)#54 8.8% (+21.9)#2,115
55. Lydia 30.6% 10.2% (+20.5)#55 8.8% (+21.9)#2,130
56. Pamplico 30.6% 10.2% (+20.4)#56 8.8% (+21.8)#2,137
57. St George 30.3% 10.2% (+20.1)#57 8.8% (+21.5)#2,180
58. Grover 30.1% 10.2% (+19.9)#58 8.8% (+21.3)#2,209
59. Watts Mills 30.0% 10.2% (+19.9)#59 8.8% (+21.3)#2,218
60. Antreville 29.5% 10.2% (+19.4)#60 8.8% (+20.8)#2,304
61. Bowman 29.4% 10.2% (+19.2)#61 8.8% (+20.6)#2,329
62. Lancaster 29.1% 10.2% (+19.0)#62 8.8% (+20.4)#2,362
63. Barnwell 28.8% 10.2% (+18.6)#63 8.8% (+20.0)#2,415
64. Cowpens 28.1% 10.2% (+17.9)#64 8.8% (+19.3)#2,549
65. Orangeburg 28.0% 10.2% (+17.8)#65 8.8% (+19.2)#2,561
66. Vance 28.0% 10.2% (+17.8)#66 8.8% (+19.2)#2,570
67. Denmark 27.9% 10.2% (+17.7)#67 8.8% (+19.2)#2,580
68. Edgefield 27.9% 10.2% (+17.7)#68 8.8% (+19.1)#2,598
69. Abbeville 27.5% 10.2% (+17.3)#69 8.8% (+18.8)#2,664
70. Blenheim 27.3% 10.2% (+17.1)#70 8.8% (+18.5)#2,725
71. Blackville 27.2% 10.2% (+17.0)#71 8.8% (+18.4)#2,734
72. Patrick 27.0% 10.2% (+16.8)#72 8.8% (+18.2)#2,758
73. Hilda 26.9% 10.2% (+16.7)#73 8.8% (+18.1)#2,802
74. Graniteville 26.8% 10.2% (+16.6)#74 8.8% (+18.0)#2,815
75. Unity 26.6% 10.2% (+16.4)#75 8.8% (+17.8)#2,855
76. Atlantic Beach 26.5% 10.2% (+16.3)#76 8.8% (+17.7)#2,866
77. Piedmont 26.3% 10.2% (+16.1)#77 8.8% (+17.5)#2,914
78. Parker 26.1% 10.2% (+15.9)#78 8.8% (+17.3)#2,960
79. North 26.0% 10.2% (+15.8)#79 8.8% (+17.2)#3,006
80. Bennettsville 26.0% 10.2% (+15.8)#80 8.8% (+17.2)#3,008
81. Iva 25.9% 10.2% (+15.7)#81 8.8% (+17.1)#3,014
82. Johnston 25.9% 10.2% (+15.7)#82 8.8% (+17.1)#3,028
83. Winnsboro 25.6% 10.2% (+15.4)#83 8.8% (+16.8)#3,088
84. Marion 25.5% 10.2% (+15.3)#84 8.8% (+16.7)#3,108
85. Homeland Park 25.5% 10.2% (+15.3)#85 8.8% (+16.7)#3,110
86. Donalds 25.3% 10.2% (+15.1)#86 8.8% (+16.5)#3,164
87. Edmund 25.0% 10.2% (+14.8)#87 8.8% (+16.2)#3,201
88. Hodges 25.0% 10.2% (+14.8)#88 8.8% (+16.2)#3,234
89. Lodge 25.0% 10.2% (+14.8)#89 8.8% (+16.2)#3,236
90. Pinewood 24.8% 10.2% (+14.6)#90 8.8% (+16.0)#3,306
91. West Pelzer 24.7% 10.2% (+14.6)#91 8.8% (+16.0)#3,307
92. Arcadia 24.7% 10.2% (+14.5)#92 8.8% (+15.9)#3,324
93. Cherryvale 24.6% 10.2% (+14.4)#93 8.8% (+15.8)#3,341
94. Bonneau 24.5% 10.2% (+14.3)#94 8.8% (+15.7)#3,372
95. Eutawville 24.2% 10.2% (+14.1)#95 8.8% (+15.5)#3,431
96. East Gaffney 24.2% 10.2% (+14.0)#96 8.8% (+15.4)#3,435
97. Burnettown 23.8% 10.2% (+13.6)#97 8.8% (+15.0)#3,560
98. Cheraw 23.5% 10.2% (+13.3)#98 8.8% (+14.7)#3,625
99. East Camden 23.5% 10.2% (+13.3)#99 8.8% (+14.7)#3,629
100. Harleyville 23.5% 10.2% (+13.3)#100 8.8% (+14.7)#3,635

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in South Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in South Carolina are:
#1
100.0%
#2
83.9%
#3
63.6%
#4
60.5%
#5
52.5%
#6
51.0%
#7
49.5%
#8
46.7%
#9
44.6%
#10
43.5%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in South Carolina?
Willington has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in South Carolina with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the State of South Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Families in South Carolina is 10.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Families in the United States is 8.8%.