Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Minnesota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Family Poverty
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minnesota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Minnesota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Minnesota Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Minnesota

City Family Poverty vs State vs National
1. Funkley 100.0% 5.5% (+94.5)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#74
2. Inger 81.2% 5.5% (+75.7)#2 8.8% (+72.5)#161
3. Mahnomen 70.6% 5.5% (+65.1)#3 8.8% (+61.8)#238
4. Ball Club 70.5% 5.5% (+64.9)#4 8.8% (+61.7)#241
5. Nashua 66.7% 5.5% (+61.1)#5 8.8% (+57.9)#276
6. Mcgrath 66.7% 5.5% (+61.1)#6 8.8% (+57.9)#280
7. Ebro 52.6% 5.5% (+47.1)#7 8.8% (+43.8)#565
8. Riverland 51.4% 5.5% (+45.9)#8 8.8% (+42.6)#607
9. Farwell 50.0% 5.5% (+44.5)#9 8.8% (+41.2)#675
10. Tamarack 47.4% 5.5% (+41.8)#10 8.8% (+38.6)#784
11. Bruno 46.7% 5.5% (+41.1)#11 8.8% (+37.9)#813
12. White Earth 43.0% 5.5% (+37.4)#12 8.8% (+34.2)#994
13. Marietta 42.9% 5.5% (+37.3)#13 8.8% (+34.1)#1,004
14. Bena 41.7% 5.5% (+36.1)#14 8.8% (+32.9)#1,080
15. Naytahwaush 41.1% 5.5% (+35.5)#15 8.8% (+32.3)#1,139
16. Halma 40.0% 5.5% (+34.5)#16 8.8% (+31.2)#1,216
17. Twin Lakes 33.9% 5.5% (+28.4)#17 8.8% (+25.1)#1,726
18. Redby 33.6% 5.5% (+28.1)#18 8.8% (+24.9)#1,752
19. Mcgregor 33.3% 5.5% (+27.8)#19 8.8% (+24.6)#1,774
20. Dent 33.3% 5.5% (+27.8)#20 8.8% (+24.6)#1,786
21. Correll 33.3% 5.5% (+27.8)#22 8.8% (+24.6)#1,831
22. Hillman 33.3% 5.5% (+27.8)#23 8.8% (+24.6)#1,832
23. Remer 30.9% 5.5% (+25.3)#24 8.8% (+22.1)#2,088
24. Kiester 29.5% 5.5% (+23.9)#25 8.8% (+20.7)#2,310
25. Freeborn 29.3% 5.5% (+23.8)#26 8.8% (+20.6)#2,332
26. Squaw Lake 29.2% 5.5% (+23.6)#27 8.8% (+20.4)#2,359
27. Nielsville 29.2% 5.5% (+23.6)#28 8.8% (+20.4)#2,360
28. Kenneth 28.6% 5.5% (+23.0)#29 8.8% (+19.8)#2,468
29. Manchester 28.6% 5.5% (+23.0)#30 8.8% (+19.8)#2,472
30. Midway 28.6% 5.5% (+23.0)#31 8.8% (+19.8)#2,476
31. Pine Bend 28.6% 5.5% (+23.0)#32 8.8% (+19.8)#2,478
32. Staples 28.2% 5.5% (+22.7)#33 8.8% (+19.4)#2,527
33. Pine Point 27.9% 5.5% (+22.4)#34 8.8% (+19.2)#2,579
34. Sunburg 27.8% 5.5% (+22.3)#35 8.8% (+19.0)#2,617
35. Foxhome 27.6% 5.5% (+22.1)#36 8.8% (+18.8)#2,656
36. West Union 27.3% 5.5% (+21.7)#37 8.8% (+18.5)#2,723
37. Ponemah 26.5% 5.5% (+21.0)#38 8.8% (+17.7)#2,877
38. Red Lake 25.7% 5.5% (+20.2)#39 8.8% (+17.0)#3,053
39. Claremont 25.2% 5.5% (+19.7)#40 8.8% (+16.4)#3,177
40. Calumet 25.0% 5.5% (+19.5)#41 8.8% (+16.2)#3,220
41. Wendell 25.0% 5.5% (+19.5)#42 8.8% (+16.2)#3,231
42. South End 25.0% 5.5% (+19.5)#43 8.8% (+16.2)#3,259
43. Sedan 25.0% 5.5% (+19.5)#44 8.8% (+16.2)#3,262
44. Keewatin 24.8% 5.5% (+19.2)#45 8.8% (+16.0)#3,303
45. Warroad 24.4% 5.5% (+18.9)#46 8.8% (+15.7)#3,379
46. Onamia 24.3% 5.5% (+18.8)#47 8.8% (+15.6)#3,408
47. Walker 24.2% 5.5% (+18.7)#48 8.8% (+15.4)#3,442
48. Little Rock 23.8% 5.5% (+18.2)#49 8.8% (+15.0)#3,559
49. Houston 23.7% 5.5% (+18.1)#50 8.8% (+14.9)#3,589
50. Shelly 23.4% 5.5% (+17.9)#51 8.8% (+14.6)#3,653
51. Jeffers 23.4% 5.5% (+17.9)#52 8.8% (+14.6)#3,661
52. Vineland 23.1% 5.5% (+17.6)#53 8.8% (+14.3)#3,733
53. Cass Lake 23.0% 5.5% (+17.5)#54 8.8% (+14.2)#3,761
54. Eagle Bend 22.2% 5.5% (+16.6)#55 8.8% (+13.4)#4,031
55. Kasota 22.1% 5.5% (+16.6)#56 8.8% (+13.3)#4,054
56. Pelican Rapids 21.7% 5.5% (+16.2)#57 8.8% (+12.9)#4,190
57. Evan 21.1% 5.5% (+15.5)#58 8.8% (+12.3)#4,422
58. Laporte 21.1% 5.5% (+15.5)#59 8.8% (+12.3)#4,423
59. Odin 20.6% 5.5% (+15.1)#60 8.8% (+11.8)#4,605
60. South Haven 20.5% 5.5% (+14.9)#61 8.8% (+11.7)#4,652
61. Ogema 20.3% 5.5% (+14.8)#62 8.8% (+11.5)#4,708
62. Ulen 20.2% 5.5% (+14.7)#63 8.8% (+11.4)#4,761
63. Verndale 20.0% 5.5% (+14.5)#64 8.8% (+11.2)#4,821
64. Longville 20.0% 5.5% (+14.5)#65 8.8% (+11.2)#4,848
65. Wright 20.0% 5.5% (+14.5)#66 8.8% (+11.2)#4,863
66. Chisholm 19.9% 5.5% (+14.4)#67 8.8% (+11.1)#4,929
67. Blackduck 19.7% 5.5% (+14.2)#68 8.8% (+10.9)#4,987
68. Pipestone 19.6% 5.5% (+14.1)#69 8.8% (+10.8)#5,007
69. Lyle 19.5% 5.5% (+14.0)#70 8.8% (+10.8)#5,031
70. Franklin 19.5% 5.5% (+14.0)#71 8.8% (+10.7)#5,045
71. Kenyon 19.2% 5.5% (+13.7)#72 8.8% (+10.5)#5,150
72. Deer River 19.1% 5.5% (+13.5)#73 8.8% (+10.3)#5,224
73. Miltona 18.9% 5.5% (+13.4)#74 8.8% (+10.1)#5,289
74. Waltham 18.9% 5.5% (+13.3)#75 8.8% (+10.1)#5,321
75. Eveleth 18.9% 5.5% (+13.3)#76 8.8% (+10.1)#5,323
76. Brainerd 18.7% 5.5% (+13.2)#77 8.8% (+9.92)#5,410
77. Boyd 18.6% 5.5% (+13.1)#78 8.8% (+9.82)#5,440
78. Granada 18.5% 5.5% (+12.9)#79 8.8% (+9.68)#5,519
79. Barnum 18.3% 5.5% (+12.8)#80 8.8% (+9.53)#5,607
80. Evansville 18.2% 5.5% (+12.7)#81 8.8% (+9.46)#5,638
81. New Trier 18.2% 5.5% (+12.7)#82 8.8% (+9.40)#5,687
82. Wykoff 18.0% 5.5% (+12.5)#83 8.8% (+9.22)#5,773
83. Osage 17.9% 5.5% (+12.4)#84 8.8% (+9.17)#5,794
84. Grove City 17.7% 5.5% (+12.2)#85 8.8% (+8.96)#5,893
85. Sandstone 17.7% 5.5% (+12.2)#86 8.8% (+8.92)#5,909
86. Waite Park 17.5% 5.5% (+12.0)#87 8.8% (+8.77)#5,990
87. Landfall 17.5% 5.5% (+12.0)#88 8.8% (+8.76)#5,995
88. St Martin 17.4% 5.5% (+11.9)#89 8.8% (+8.66)#6,053
89. Gilbert 17.4% 5.5% (+11.9)#90 8.8% (+8.62)#6,069
90. Belview 17.2% 5.5% (+11.7)#91 8.8% (+8.42)#6,174
91. Backus 17.1% 5.5% (+11.6)#92 8.8% (+8.36)#6,196
92. Braham 17.1% 5.5% (+11.6)#93 8.8% (+8.32)#6,216
93. Bellechester 17.0% 5.5% (+11.5)#94 8.8% (+8.24)#6,266
94. Elmore 16.9% 5.5% (+11.4)#95 8.8% (+8.14)#6,312
95. Welcome 16.9% 5.5% (+11.4)#96 8.8% (+8.10)#6,333
96. Jasper 16.7% 5.5% (+11.1)#97 8.8% (+7.88)#6,441
97. Chandler 16.7% 5.5% (+11.1)#98 8.8% (+7.88)#6,447
98. Villard 16.7% 5.5% (+11.1)#99 8.8% (+7.88)#6,458
99. Leonidas 16.7% 5.5% (+11.1)#100 8.8% (+7.88)#6,490
100. Nassau 16.7% 5.5% (+11.1)#101 8.8% (+7.88)#6,491

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Minnesota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Minnesota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
81.2%
#3
70.6%
#4
70.5%
#5
66.7%
#6
66.7%
#7
52.6%
#8
51.4%
#9
50.0%
#10
47.4%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Minnesota?
Funkley has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Minnesota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the State of Minnesota?
Poverty Level Among Families in Minnesota is 5.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Families in the United States is 8.8%.