Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Family Poverty
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in North Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in North Dakota

City Family Poverty vs State vs National
1. Hannah 100.0% 6.1% (+93.9)#1 8.8% (+91.2)#119
2. Sarles 66.7% 6.1% (+60.5)#2 8.8% (+57.9)#282
3. East Dunseith 63.1% 6.1% (+57.0)#3 8.8% (+54.3)#340
4. Fort Totten 52.3% 6.1% (+46.2)#4 8.8% (+43.5)#576
5. Ryder 51.6% 6.1% (+45.5)#5 8.8% (+42.8)#601
6. Springbrook 50.0% 6.1% (+43.9)#6 8.8% (+41.2)#677
7. Fortuna 45.5% 6.1% (+39.3)#7 8.8% (+36.7)#857
8. Luverne 42.9% 6.1% (+36.7)#8 8.8% (+34.1)#1,014
9. Cannon Ball 41.7% 6.1% (+35.6)#9 8.8% (+32.9)#1,077
10. Litchville 40.7% 6.1% (+34.6)#10 8.8% (+32.0)#1,157
11. Noonan 40.0% 6.1% (+33.9)#11 8.8% (+31.2)#1,203
12. Verona 36.4% 6.1% (+30.2)#12 8.8% (+27.6)#1,476
13. Maddock 35.9% 6.1% (+29.8)#13 8.8% (+27.1)#1,510
14. Four Bears Village 35.5% 6.1% (+29.3)#14 8.8% (+26.7)#1,560
15. Esmond 35.3% 6.1% (+29.2)#15 8.8% (+26.5)#1,584
16. Egeland 33.3% 6.1% (+27.2)#16 8.8% (+24.6)#1,808
17. Hansboro 33.3% 6.1% (+27.2)#17 8.8% (+24.6)#1,828
18. Leal 33.3% 6.1% (+27.2)#18 8.8% (+24.6)#1,833
19. Maxbass 31.6% 6.1% (+25.4)#19 8.8% (+22.8)#1,995
20. Shell Valley 29.2% 6.1% (+23.1)#20 8.8% (+20.5)#2,343
21. Solen 28.6% 6.1% (+22.4)#21 8.8% (+19.8)#2,466
22. Souris 28.6% 6.1% (+22.4)#22 8.8% (+19.8)#2,471
23. Green Acres 28.5% 6.1% (+22.3)#23 8.8% (+19.7)#2,484
24. Bowdon 27.7% 6.1% (+21.5)#24 8.8% (+18.9)#2,638
25. Drake 27.5% 6.1% (+21.4)#25 8.8% (+18.8)#2,665
26. Canton City Hensel 27.3% 6.1% (+21.1)#26 8.8% (+18.5)#2,728
27. Parshall 26.9% 6.1% (+20.7)#27 8.8% (+18.1)#2,798
28. Mooreton 26.7% 6.1% (+20.5)#28 8.8% (+17.9)#2,835
29. Mandaree 26.0% 6.1% (+19.9)#29 8.8% (+17.3)#2,981
30. Stanton 25.2% 6.1% (+19.1)#30 8.8% (+16.4)#3,175
31. Walhalla 25.0% 6.1% (+18.9)#31 8.8% (+16.2)#3,204
32. Fingal 25.0% 6.1% (+18.9)#32 8.8% (+16.2)#3,240
33. Warwick 25.0% 6.1% (+18.9)#33 8.8% (+16.2)#3,244
34. Loma 25.0% 6.1% (+18.9)#34 8.8% (+16.2)#3,264
35. Amidon 23.1% 6.1% (+16.9)#35 8.8% (+14.3)#3,752
36. Scranton 22.2% 6.1% (+16.1)#36 8.8% (+13.4)#3,995
37. Ruthville 22.2% 6.1% (+16.1)#37 8.8% (+13.4)#4,003
38. Towner 22.1% 6.1% (+16.0)#38 8.8% (+13.4)#4,037
39. Halliday 21.1% 6.1% (+14.9)#39 8.8% (+12.3)#4,412
40. Zeeland 21.1% 6.1% (+14.9)#40 8.8% (+12.3)#4,415
41. Coleharbor 20.0% 6.1% (+13.9)#41 8.8% (+11.2)#4,868
42. Tuttle 20.0% 6.1% (+13.9)#42 8.8% (+11.2)#4,880
43. Barney 20.0% 6.1% (+13.9)#43 8.8% (+11.2)#4,881
44. Hoople 19.4% 6.1% (+13.3)#44 8.8% (+10.6)#5,094
45. Selfridge 19.2% 6.1% (+13.1)#45 8.8% (+10.4)#5,156
46. Lankin 19.0% 6.1% (+12.9)#46 8.8% (+10.3)#5,237
47. Tappen 18.9% 6.1% (+12.8)#47 8.8% (+10.1)#5,292
48. Fort Yates 18.2% 6.1% (+12.0)#48 8.8% (+9.40)#5,677
49. Minto 17.9% 6.1% (+11.7)#49 8.8% (+9.08)#5,834
50. Sheyenne 17.0% 6.1% (+10.9)#50 8.8% (+8.24)#6,265
51. Wishek 16.1% 6.1% (+9.96)#51 8.8% (+7.32)#6,775
52. Nome 15.8% 6.1% (+9.65)#52 8.8% (+7.01)#6,956
53. Medina 15.5% 6.1% (+9.37)#53 8.8% (+6.74)#7,113
54. Glen Ullin 15.4% 6.1% (+9.29)#54 8.8% (+6.65)#7,163
55. Upham 15.4% 6.1% (+9.24)#55 8.8% (+6.60)#7,208
56. Ashley 15.2% 6.1% (+9.09)#56 8.8% (+6.45)#7,303
57. Gladstone 14.9% 6.1% (+8.78)#57 8.8% (+6.14)#7,526
58. Bowman 14.9% 6.1% (+8.75)#58 8.8% (+6.11)#7,551
59. New Town 14.6% 6.1% (+8.50)#59 8.8% (+5.86)#7,697
60. Hazelton 14.6% 6.1% (+8.44)#60 8.8% (+5.80)#7,737
61. Belcourt 14.6% 6.1% (+8.44)#61 8.8% (+5.80)#7,751
62. Kensal 14.5% 6.1% (+8.40)#62 8.8% (+5.76)#7,770
63. Rolette 14.3% 6.1% (+8.14)#63 8.8% (+5.50)#7,938
64. Gackle 14.3% 6.1% (+8.14)#64 8.8% (+5.50)#7,955
65. Alice 14.3% 6.1% (+8.14)#65 8.8% (+5.50)#8,001
66. Fairdale 14.3% 6.1% (+8.14)#66 8.8% (+5.50)#8,008
67. Lakota 14.2% 6.1% (+8.05)#67 8.8% (+5.41)#8,055
68. Page 14.0% 6.1% (+7.81)#68 8.8% (+5.17)#8,224
69. Elgin 13.9% 6.1% (+7.76)#69 8.8% (+5.13)#8,255
70. Adams 13.9% 6.1% (+7.75)#70 8.8% (+5.11)#8,275
71. Wyndmere 13.8% 6.1% (+7.69)#71 8.8% (+5.05)#8,314
72. Hannaford 13.6% 6.1% (+7.49)#72 8.8% (+4.85)#8,483
73. Pekin 13.3% 6.1% (+7.19)#73 8.8% (+4.55)#8,708
74. Harvey 12.8% 6.1% (+6.70)#74 8.8% (+4.06)#9,091
75. Devils Lake 12.8% 6.1% (+6.67)#75 8.8% (+4.03)#9,119
76. Dunseith 12.8% 6.1% (+6.61)#76 8.8% (+3.97)#9,164
77. Lisbon 12.7% 6.1% (+6.56)#77 8.8% (+3.92)#9,203
78. Finley 12.4% 6.1% (+6.22)#78 8.8% (+3.58)#9,477
79. Belfield 12.0% 6.1% (+5.86)#79 8.8% (+3.22)#9,789
80. Pettibone 11.8% 6.1% (+5.62)#80 8.8% (+2.98)#10,021
81. Wahpeton 11.6% 6.1% (+5.42)#81 8.8% (+2.78)#10,196
82. Rolla 11.5% 6.1% (+5.31)#82 8.8% (+2.67)#10,306
83. Emerado 11.1% 6.1% (+4.97)#83 8.8% (+2.33)#10,625
84. Valley City 10.5% 6.1% (+4.35)#84 8.8% (+1.71)#11,249
85. Garrison 10.3% 6.1% (+4.19)#85 8.8% (+1.55)#11,423
86. Regent 10.3% 6.1% (+4.11)#86 8.8% (+1.47)#11,505
87. Jamestown 10.1% 6.1% (+3.96)#87 8.8% (+1.32)#11,655
88. Butte 10.0% 6.1% (+3.86)#88 8.8% (+1.22)#11,786
89. Hamilton 10.0% 6.1% (+3.86)#89 8.8% (+1.22)#11,798
90. Center 9.9% 6.1% (+3.80)#90 8.8% (+1.16)#11,848
91. Mohall 9.7% 6.1% (+3.51)#91 8.8% (+0.874)#12,192
92. Watford City 9.6% 6.1% (+3.41)#92 8.8% (+0.772)#12,288
93. Beach 9.5% 6.1% (+3.40)#93 8.8% (+0.760)#12,301
94. Turtle Lake 9.4% 6.1% (+3.29)#94 8.8% (+0.652)#12,431
95. Ellendale 9.4% 6.1% (+3.28)#95 8.8% (+0.642)#12,446
96. Hankinson 9.4% 6.1% (+3.28)#96 8.8% (+0.642)#12,448
97. Mott 9.2% 6.1% (+3.08)#97 8.8% (+0.438)#12,653
98. Pembina 9.1% 6.1% (+2.95)#98 8.8% (+0.309)#12,794
99. Mcclusky 8.9% 6.1% (+2.72)#99 8.8% (+0.079)#13,055
100. Edgeley 8.8% 6.1% (+2.63)#100 8.8% (-0.010)#13,154

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in North Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
66.7%
#3
63.1%
#4
52.3%
#5
51.6%
#6
50.0%
#7
45.5%
#8
42.9%
#9
41.7%
#10
40.7%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in North Dakota?
Hannah has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in North Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the State of North Dakota?
Poverty Level Among Families in North Dakota is 6.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Families in the United States is 8.8%.