Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Material Moving
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States

30.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 97432, Oregon 100.0% 3.7% (+96.3)#1 3.8% (+96.2)#1
2. 95514, California 100.0% 3.8% (+96.2)#1 3.8% (+96.2)#2
3. 72729, Arkansas 100.0% 4.7% (+95.3)#1 3.8% (+96.2)#3
4. 97329, Oregon 100.0% 3.7% (+96.3)#2 3.8% (+96.2)#4
5. 87753, New Mexico 100.0% 3.2% (+96.8)#1 3.8% (+96.2)#5
6. 47455, Indiana 100.0% 5.4% (+94.6)#1 3.8% (+96.2)#6
7. 37732, Tennessee 100.0% 5.0% (+95.0)#1 3.8% (+96.2)#7
8. 13352, New York 100.0% 2.5% (+97.5)#1 3.8% (+96.2)#8
9. 76573, Texas 100.0% 3.9% (+96.1)#1 3.8% (+96.2)#9
10. 71425, Louisiana 100.0% 3.3% (+96.7)#1 3.8% (+96.2)#10
11. 79025, Texas 100.0% 3.9% (+96.1)#2 3.8% (+96.2)#11
12. 81642, Colorado 100.0% 2.9% (+97.1)#1 3.8% (+96.2)#12
13. 72826, Arkansas 100.0% 4.7% (+95.3)#2 3.8% (+96.2)#13
14. 95923, California 85.7% 3.8% (+81.9)#2 3.8% (+81.9)#14
15. 82440, Wyoming 81.6% 3.2% (+78.4)#1 3.8% (+77.8)#15
16. 25205, West Virginia 77.9% 4.5% (+73.4)#1 3.8% (+74.1)#16
17. 70513, Louisiana 74.1% 3.3% (+70.8)#2 3.8% (+70.2)#17
18. 26276, West Virginia 72.0% 4.5% (+67.5)#2 3.8% (+68.2)#18
19. 27967, North Carolina 71.4% 4.1% (+67.3)#1 3.8% (+67.6)#19
20. 41735, Kentucky 67.6% 5.6% (+62.1)#1 3.8% (+63.8)#20
21. 08011, New Jersey 65.6% 3.6% (+62.0)#1 3.8% (+61.8)#21
22. 03751, New Hampshire 65.1% 2.8% (+62.3)#1 3.8% (+61.2)#22
23. 16416, Pennsylvania 63.6% 4.6% (+59.1)#1 3.8% (+59.8)#23
24. 25647, West Virginia 63.3% 4.5% (+58.8)#3 3.8% (+59.5)#24
25. 95443, California 61.5% 3.8% (+57.7)#3 3.8% (+57.7)#25
26. 15539, Pennsylvania 61.2% 4.6% (+56.6)#2 3.8% (+57.4)#26
27. 97627, Oregon 60.4% 3.7% (+56.7)#3 3.8% (+56.5)#27
28. 83525, Idaho 59.8% 3.6% (+56.1)#1 3.8% (+55.9)#28
29. 25846, West Virginia 58.1% 4.5% (+53.6)#4 3.8% (+54.2)#29
30. 24860, West Virginia 56.9% 4.5% (+52.4)#5 3.8% (+53.1)#30
31. 20656, Maryland 56.5% 2.9% (+53.6)#1 3.8% (+52.7)#31
32. 26361, West Virginia 56.5% 4.5% (+52.0)#6 3.8% (+52.7)#32
33. 52344, Iowa 56.2% 4.9% (+51.4)#1 3.8% (+52.4)#33
34. 93042, California 55.6% 3.8% (+51.7)#4 3.8% (+51.7)#34
35. 11947, New York 54.9% 2.5% (+52.4)#2 3.8% (+51.1)#35
36. 40847, Kentucky 54.8% 5.6% (+49.3)#2 3.8% (+51.0)#36
37. 41729, Kentucky 54.5% 5.6% (+49.0)#3 3.8% (+50.7)#37
38. 15662, Pennsylvania 54.4% 4.6% (+49.8)#3 3.8% (+50.5)#38
39. 95925, California 54.2% 3.8% (+50.3)#5 3.8% (+50.3)#39
40. 38950, Mississippi 54.1% 4.7% (+49.4)#1 3.8% (+50.3)#40
41. 44660, Ohio 53.8% 4.9% (+48.8)#1 3.8% (+49.9)#41
42. 45677, Ohio 53.3% 4.9% (+48.4)#2 3.8% (+49.5)#42
43. 28666, North Carolina 53.2% 4.1% (+49.1)#2 3.8% (+49.4)#43
44. 44861, Ohio 53.1% 4.9% (+48.1)#3 3.8% (+49.2)#44
45. 82638, Wyoming 52.9% 3.2% (+49.7)#2 3.8% (+49.1)#45
46. 28628, North Carolina 52.9% 4.1% (+48.9)#3 3.8% (+49.1)#46
47. 72668, Arkansas 52.5% 4.7% (+47.8)#3 3.8% (+48.7)#47
48. 44068, Ohio 51.8% 4.9% (+46.8)#4 3.8% (+47.9)#48
49. 76061, Texas 50.8% 3.9% (+47.0)#3 3.8% (+47.0)#49
50. 66518, Kansas 50.5% 4.2% (+46.2)#1 3.8% (+46.6)#50
51. 99647, Alaska 50.0% 3.6% (+46.4)#1 3.8% (+46.2)#51
52. 15275, Pennsylvania 50.0% 4.6% (+45.4)#4 3.8% (+46.2)#52
53. 25102, West Virginia 48.1% 4.5% (+43.6)#7 3.8% (+44.2)#53
54. 31034, Georgia 48.0% 4.5% (+43.5)#1 3.8% (+44.2)#54
55. 41764, Kentucky 47.7% 5.6% (+42.2)#4 3.8% (+43.9)#55
56. 29923, South Carolina 47.7% 4.1% (+43.6)#1 3.8% (+43.8)#56
57. 21130, Maryland 47.6% 2.9% (+44.7)#2 3.8% (+43.8)#57
58. 96121, California 46.6% 3.8% (+42.8)#6 3.8% (+42.8)#58
59. 59217, Montana 44.4% 3.2% (+41.3)#1 3.8% (+40.6)#59
60. 45646, Ohio 44.0% 4.9% (+39.0)#5 3.8% (+40.2)#60
61. 26438, West Virginia 43.6% 4.5% (+39.1)#8 3.8% (+39.8)#61
62. 28757, North Carolina 43.1% 4.1% (+39.0)#4 3.8% (+39.2)#62
63. 73437, Oklahoma 42.9% 4.1% (+38.8)#1 3.8% (+39.0)#63
64. 68056, Nebraska 42.9% 3.6% (+39.2)#1 3.8% (+39.0)#64
65. 96109, California 42.8% 3.8% (+38.9)#7 3.8% (+38.9)#65
66. 15351, Pennsylvania 42.8% 4.6% (+38.2)#5 3.8% (+38.9)#66
67. 22743, Virginia 42.7% 3.0% (+39.7)#1 3.8% (+38.9)#67
68. 24818, West Virginia 42.5% 4.5% (+38.0)#9 3.8% (+38.7)#68
69. 21902, Maryland 42.5% 2.9% (+39.6)#3 3.8% (+38.7)#69
70. 63840, Missouri 42.3% 4.3% (+38.0)#1 3.8% (+38.5)#70
71. 26463, West Virginia 42.1% 4.5% (+37.6)#10 3.8% (+38.3)#71
72. 79781, Texas 42.1% 3.9% (+38.2)#4 3.8% (+38.3)#72
73. 47585, Indiana 42.0% 5.4% (+36.6)#2 3.8% (+38.2)#73
74. 25142, West Virginia 41.8% 4.5% (+37.3)#11 3.8% (+37.9)#74
75. 85608, Arizona 41.7% 3.6% (+38.1)#1 3.8% (+37.8)#75
76. 24377, Virginia 41.7% 3.0% (+38.6)#2 3.8% (+37.8)#76
77. 44825, Ohio 41.7% 4.9% (+36.7)#6 3.8% (+37.8)#77
78. 70091, Louisiana 41.3% 3.3% (+38.1)#3 3.8% (+37.5)#78
79. 72431, Arkansas 41.2% 4.7% (+36.5)#4 3.8% (+37.4)#79
80. 43414, Ohio 40.8% 4.9% (+35.8)#7 3.8% (+36.9)#80
81. 95486, California 40.7% 3.8% (+36.9)#8 3.8% (+36.9)#81
82. 66775, Kansas 40.5% 4.2% (+36.2)#2 3.8% (+36.6)#82
83. 98643, Washington 40.3% 3.7% (+36.7)#1 3.8% (+36.5)#83
84. 38625, Mississippi 40.3% 4.7% (+35.6)#2 3.8% (+36.4)#84
85. 26852, West Virginia 40.1% 4.5% (+35.6)#12 3.8% (+36.3)#85
86. 16322, Pennsylvania 40.0% 4.6% (+35.4)#6 3.8% (+36.2)#86
87. 58452, North Dakota 40.0% 3.5% (+36.5)#1 3.8% (+36.2)#87
88. 25432, West Virginia 39.4% 4.5% (+34.9)#13 3.8% (+35.6)#88
89. 78116, Texas 39.3% 3.9% (+35.4)#5 3.8% (+35.5)#89
90. 26178, West Virginia 39.3% 4.5% (+34.8)#14 3.8% (+35.5)#90
91. 27582, North Carolina 39.2% 4.1% (+35.1)#5 3.8% (+35.3)#91
92. 40863, Kentucky 39.1% 5.6% (+33.6)#5 3.8% (+35.3)#92
93. 47916, Indiana 39.1% 5.4% (+33.7)#3 3.8% (+35.3)#93
94. 64036, Missouri 39.1% 4.3% (+34.8)#2 3.8% (+35.2)#94
95. 15492, Pennsylvania 39.0% 4.6% (+34.5)#7 3.8% (+35.2)#95
96. 50272, Iowa 38.9% 4.9% (+34.0)#2 3.8% (+35.1)#96
97. 30018, Georgia 38.9% 4.5% (+34.4)#2 3.8% (+35.1)#97
98. 81335, Colorado 38.9% 2.9% (+35.9)#2 3.8% (+35.1)#98
99. 06263, Connecticut 38.8% 2.8% (+36.0)#1 3.8% (+34.9)#99
100. 31630, Georgia 38.5% 4.5% (+34.0)#3 3.8% (+34.6)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States?
97432 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States is 3.8%.