Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Iowa

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Father
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Iowa
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Iowa

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Iowa Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Iowa

City Single Father Poverty vs State vs National
1. Camanche 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#1 13.7% (+86.3)#89
2. Eldora 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#2 13.7% (+86.3)#205
3. Kent Estates 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#3 13.7% (+86.3)#261
4. Corydon 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#4 13.7% (+86.3)#310
5. West Bend 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#5 13.7% (+86.3)#511
6. Morning Sun 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#6 13.7% (+86.3)#564
7. Emerson 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#7 13.7% (+86.3)#719
8. Dow City 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#8 13.7% (+86.3)#790
9. Deep River 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#9 13.7% (+86.3)#856
10. Chelsea 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#10 13.7% (+86.3)#867
11. Floyd 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#11 13.7% (+86.3)#889
12. Cumberland 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#12 13.7% (+86.3)#922
13. Kirkville 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#13 13.7% (+86.3)#930
14. Ladora 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#14 13.7% (+86.3)#940
15. Macedonia 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#15 13.7% (+86.3)#982
16. Harcourt 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#16 13.7% (+86.3)#1,012
17. Geneva 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#17 13.7% (+86.3)#1,062
18. Waterville 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#18 13.7% (+86.3)#1,069
19. Stockton 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#19 13.7% (+86.3)#1,080
20. North Washington 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#20 13.7% (+86.3)#1,085
21. Centralia 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#21 13.7% (+86.3)#1,098
22. Swaledale 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#22 13.7% (+86.3)#1,100
23. Keomah Village 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#23 13.7% (+86.3)#1,106
24. St Olaf 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#24 13.7% (+86.3)#1,116
25. Sharpsburg 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#25 13.7% (+86.3)#1,155
26. Dougherty 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#26 13.7% (+86.3)#1,165
27. Dana 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#27 13.7% (+86.3)#1,195
28. Cotter 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#28 13.7% (+86.3)#1,198
29. Victor 96.6% 12.2% (+84.4)#29 13.7% (+82.8)#1,204
30. Oakville 85.7% 12.2% (+73.6)#30 13.7% (+72.0)#1,282
31. Ogden 85.0% 12.2% (+72.8)#31 13.7% (+71.3)#1,291
32. Earling 83.3% 12.2% (+71.2)#32 13.7% (+69.6)#1,319
33. Miles 83.3% 12.2% (+71.2)#33 13.7% (+69.6)#1,320
34. Bode 83.3% 12.2% (+71.2)#34 13.7% (+69.6)#1,321
35. Fayette 81.2% 12.2% (+69.1)#35 13.7% (+67.5)#1,352
36. Sheffield 80.0% 12.2% (+67.8)#36 13.7% (+66.3)#1,369
37. Schaller 80.0% 12.2% (+67.8)#37 13.7% (+66.3)#1,371
38. Lockridge 80.0% 12.2% (+67.8)#38 13.7% (+66.3)#1,380
39. Burt 77.8% 12.2% (+65.6)#39 13.7% (+64.1)#1,427
40. Logan 76.9% 12.2% (+64.8)#40 13.7% (+63.2)#1,434
41. Whiting 75.0% 12.2% (+62.8)#41 13.7% (+61.3)#1,470
42. Wyoming 75.0% 12.2% (+62.8)#42 13.7% (+61.3)#1,477
43. Sabula 71.4% 12.2% (+59.3)#43 13.7% (+57.7)#1,573
44. Ocheyedan 68.8% 12.2% (+56.6)#44 13.7% (+55.0)#1,639
45. Hiawatha 68.6% 12.2% (+56.5)#45 13.7% (+54.9)#1,640
46. Moravia 66.7% 12.2% (+54.5)#46 13.7% (+53.0)#1,709
47. Ashton 66.7% 12.2% (+54.5)#47 13.7% (+53.0)#1,710
48. Marble Rock 66.7% 12.2% (+54.5)#48 13.7% (+53.0)#1,739
49. Villisca 63.6% 12.2% (+51.5)#49 13.7% (+49.9)#1,813
50. Hedrick 63.2% 12.2% (+51.0)#50 13.7% (+49.4)#1,826
51. Sibley 60.0% 12.2% (+47.8)#51 13.7% (+46.3)#1,921
52. New Hartford 60.0% 12.2% (+47.8)#52 13.7% (+46.3)#1,939
53. Beaverdale 60.0% 12.2% (+47.8)#53 13.7% (+46.3)#1,941
54. Thor 60.0% 12.2% (+47.8)#54 13.7% (+46.3)#1,960
55. Eagle Grove 59.8% 12.2% (+47.6)#55 13.7% (+46.0)#1,966
56. West Branch 58.3% 12.2% (+46.2)#56 13.7% (+44.6)#2,010
57. Cascade 58.3% 12.2% (+46.2)#57 13.7% (+44.6)#2,011
58. New Hampton 57.8% 12.2% (+45.6)#58 13.7% (+44.1)#2,026
59. Kellogg 57.1% 12.2% (+45.0)#59 13.7% (+43.4)#2,063
60. Hampton 56.8% 12.2% (+44.7)#60 13.7% (+43.1)#2,081
61. Winfield 55.6% 12.2% (+43.4)#61 13.7% (+41.8)#2,121
62. Paullina 55.6% 12.2% (+43.4)#62 13.7% (+41.8)#2,127
63. West Union 50.0% 12.2% (+37.8)#63 13.7% (+36.3)#2,352
64. Stratford 50.0% 12.2% (+37.8)#64 13.7% (+36.3)#2,402
65. Middletown 50.0% 12.2% (+37.8)#65 13.7% (+36.3)#2,458
66. Bayard 50.0% 12.2% (+37.8)#66 13.7% (+36.3)#2,463
67. Hancock 50.0% 12.2% (+37.8)#67 13.7% (+36.3)#2,477
68. Bertram 50.0% 12.2% (+37.8)#68 13.7% (+36.3)#2,485
69. Moorhead 50.0% 12.2% (+37.8)#69 13.7% (+36.3)#2,486
70. Boxholm 50.0% 12.2% (+37.8)#70 13.7% (+36.3)#2,499
71. Buckeye 50.0% 12.2% (+37.8)#71 13.7% (+36.3)#2,506
72. Mount Pleasant 47.7% 12.2% (+35.5)#72 13.7% (+34.0)#2,577
73. Holstein 47.1% 12.2% (+34.9)#73 13.7% (+33.3)#2,603
74. Stacyville 47.1% 12.2% (+34.9)#74 13.7% (+33.3)#2,608
75. Mount Ayr 46.7% 12.2% (+34.5)#75 13.7% (+33.0)#2,616
76. Bancroft 45.5% 12.2% (+33.3)#76 13.7% (+31.7)#2,676
77. Knoxville 43.9% 12.2% (+31.8)#77 13.7% (+30.2)#2,745
78. Janesville 42.9% 12.2% (+30.7)#78 13.7% (+29.1)#2,807
79. Blairstown 42.9% 12.2% (+30.7)#79 13.7% (+29.1)#2,812
80. Ottumwa 41.9% 12.2% (+29.7)#80 13.7% (+28.1)#2,867
81. Ida Grove 41.7% 12.2% (+29.5)#81 13.7% (+28.0)#2,876
82. Atlantic 41.0% 12.2% (+28.9)#82 13.7% (+27.3)#2,910
83. Rockwell City 40.0% 12.2% (+27.8)#83 13.7% (+26.3)#2,960
84. Lamoni 40.0% 12.2% (+27.8)#84 13.7% (+26.3)#2,962
85. Stuart 40.0% 12.2% (+27.8)#85 13.7% (+26.3)#2,964
86. Springville 40.0% 12.2% (+27.8)#86 13.7% (+26.3)#2,971
87. Mapleton 40.0% 12.2% (+27.8)#87 13.7% (+26.3)#2,975
88. Bagley 40.0% 12.2% (+27.8)#88 13.7% (+26.3)#3,006
89. Guernsey 40.0% 12.2% (+27.8)#89 13.7% (+26.3)#3,013
90. Marquette 37.5% 12.2% (+25.3)#90 13.7% (+23.8)#3,149
91. Buffalo 36.8% 12.2% (+24.7)#91 13.7% (+23.1)#3,199
92. Dumont 35.7% 12.2% (+23.6)#92 13.7% (+22.0)#3,287
93. Burlington 35.4% 12.2% (+23.3)#93 13.7% (+21.7)#3,299
94. What Cheer 34.6% 12.2% (+22.5)#94 13.7% (+20.9)#3,361
95. Chariton 34.4% 12.2% (+22.2)#95 13.7% (+20.7)#3,380
96. Carlisle 34.2% 12.2% (+22.1)#96 13.7% (+20.5)#3,389
97. Laurens 33.3% 12.2% (+21.2)#97 13.7% (+19.6)#3,466
98. Lakeside 33.3% 12.2% (+21.2)#98 13.7% (+19.6)#3,493
99. Badger 33.3% 12.2% (+21.2)#99 13.7% (+19.6)#3,516
100. Elliott 33.3% 12.2% (+21.2)#100 13.7% (+19.6)#3,517

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Iowa?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Iowa are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Iowa?
Camanche has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Iowa with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the State of Iowa?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Iowa is 12.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the United States is 13.7%.