Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Father
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Oklahoma

City Single Father Poverty vs State vs National
1. Grove 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#1 13.7% (+86.3)#39
2. Eufaula 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#2 13.7% (+86.3)#185
3. Cleora 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#3 13.7% (+86.3)#341
4. Moodys 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#4 13.7% (+86.3)#446
5. Pond Creek 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#5 13.7% (+86.3)#493
6. Cherry Tree 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#6 13.7% (+86.3)#597
7. Wright City 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#7 13.7% (+86.3)#681
8. Ketchum 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#8 13.7% (+86.3)#705
9. Canute 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#9 13.7% (+86.3)#726
10. Hulbert 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#10 13.7% (+86.3)#738
11. Glencoe 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#11 13.7% (+86.3)#742
12. Tushka 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#12 13.7% (+86.3)#776
13. Calvin 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#13 13.7% (+86.3)#788
14. Covington 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#14 13.7% (+86.3)#803
15. Delaware 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#15 13.7% (+86.3)#855
16. Peavine 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#16 13.7% (+86.3)#868
17. Arpelar 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#17 13.7% (+86.3)#872
18. Jennings 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#18 13.7% (+86.3)#891
19. North Miami 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#19 13.7% (+86.3)#893
20. Mill Creek 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#20 13.7% (+86.3)#928
21. Watts 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#22 13.7% (+86.3)#937
22. Cedar Crest 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#23 13.7% (+86.3)#939
23. River Bottom 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#24 13.7% (+86.3)#955
24. Teresita 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#25 13.7% (+86.3)#1,028
25. Devol 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#26 13.7% (+86.3)#1,052
26. Garvin 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#27 13.7% (+86.3)#1,075
27. Elm Grove 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#28 13.7% (+86.3)#1,076
28. Castle 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#29 13.7% (+86.3)#1,077
29. Kenefic 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#30 13.7% (+86.3)#1,081
30. Wainwright 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#31 13.7% (+86.3)#1,105
31. Phillips 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#32 13.7% (+86.3)#1,130
32. Headrick 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#33 13.7% (+86.3)#1,142
33. New Alluwe 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#34 13.7% (+86.3)#1,167
34. Moffett 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#35 13.7% (+86.3)#1,174
35. Webb City 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#36 13.7% (+86.3)#1,179
36. Terlton 100.0% 17.2% (+82.8)#37 13.7% (+86.3)#1,182
37. Bradley 93.3% 17.2% (+76.2)#38 13.7% (+79.6)#1,215
38. Goodwell 87.5% 17.2% (+70.3)#39 13.7% (+73.8)#1,256
39. Nicut 87.5% 17.2% (+70.3)#40 13.7% (+73.8)#1,261
40. Kingfisher 85.7% 17.2% (+68.5)#41 13.7% (+72.0)#1,273
41. Depew 85.7% 17.2% (+68.5)#42 13.7% (+72.0)#1,280
42. Twin Oaks 85.7% 17.2% (+68.5)#43 13.7% (+72.0)#1,281
43. White Eagle 82.4% 17.2% (+65.2)#44 13.7% (+68.6)#1,333
44. Talihina 81.8% 17.2% (+64.7)#45 13.7% (+68.1)#1,341
45. Central High 81.0% 17.2% (+63.8)#46 13.7% (+67.2)#1,358
46. Heavener 79.2% 17.2% (+62.0)#47 13.7% (+65.5)#1,400
47. Pawhuska 73.3% 17.2% (+56.2)#48 13.7% (+59.6)#1,514
48. Apache 69.2% 17.2% (+52.1)#49 13.7% (+55.5)#1,628
49. Prue 66.7% 17.2% (+49.5)#50 13.7% (+53.0)#1,723
50. Westport 66.7% 17.2% (+49.5)#51 13.7% (+53.0)#1,728
51. Ralston 66.7% 17.2% (+49.5)#52 13.7% (+53.0)#1,730
52. Canadian Shores 66.7% 17.2% (+49.5)#53 13.7% (+53.0)#1,737
53. Kinta 66.7% 17.2% (+49.5)#54 13.7% (+53.0)#1,738
54. Winchester 65.5% 17.2% (+48.4)#55 13.7% (+51.8)#1,767
55. Akins 64.3% 17.2% (+47.1)#56 13.7% (+50.6)#1,797
56. Hobart 63.3% 17.2% (+46.1)#57 13.7% (+49.6)#1,824
57. Chandler 61.9% 17.2% (+44.7)#58 13.7% (+48.2)#1,859
58. Keys 61.4% 17.2% (+44.2)#59 13.7% (+47.7)#1,882
59. Colbert 60.0% 17.2% (+42.8)#60 13.7% (+46.3)#1,926
60. Wister 60.0% 17.2% (+42.8)#61 13.7% (+46.3)#1,929
61. Rocky Mountain 60.0% 17.2% (+42.8)#62 13.7% (+46.3)#1,944
62. Oaks 60.0% 17.2% (+42.8)#63 13.7% (+46.3)#1,958
63. Lehigh 60.0% 17.2% (+42.8)#64 13.7% (+46.3)#1,959
64. Verden 58.3% 17.2% (+41.2)#65 13.7% (+44.6)#2,017
65. Amber 58.3% 17.2% (+41.2)#66 13.7% (+44.6)#2,018
66. Commerce 57.7% 17.2% (+40.5)#67 13.7% (+44.0)#2,029
67. Coalgate 57.1% 17.2% (+40.0)#68 13.7% (+43.4)#2,044
68. Fletcher 57.1% 17.2% (+40.0)#69 13.7% (+43.4)#2,053
69. Bokchito 57.1% 17.2% (+40.0)#70 13.7% (+43.4)#2,067
70. Wetumka 55.6% 17.2% (+38.4)#71 13.7% (+41.8)#2,118
71. Anadarko 55.1% 17.2% (+38.0)#72 13.7% (+41.4)#2,139
72. Okemah 54.8% 17.2% (+37.7)#73 13.7% (+41.1)#2,148
73. Henryetta 54.5% 17.2% (+37.4)#74 13.7% (+40.8)#2,157
74. Fairfield 54.5% 17.2% (+37.4)#75 13.7% (+40.8)#2,175
75. Drumright 54.2% 17.2% (+37.0)#76 13.7% (+40.5)#2,184
76. Hugo 53.3% 17.2% (+36.1)#77 13.7% (+39.6)#2,229
77. Poteau 52.2% 17.2% (+35.0)#78 13.7% (+38.5)#2,266
78. Weleetka 51.9% 17.2% (+34.7)#79 13.7% (+38.1)#2,283
79. Ames 51.7% 17.2% (+34.6)#80 13.7% (+38.0)#2,292
80. Waurika 50.0% 17.2% (+32.8)#81 13.7% (+36.3)#2,360
81. Wilson 50.0% 17.2% (+32.8)#82 13.7% (+36.3)#2,364
82. Vian 50.0% 17.2% (+32.8)#83 13.7% (+36.3)#2,368
83. Gore 50.0% 17.2% (+32.8)#84 13.7% (+36.3)#2,379
84. Shady Point 50.0% 17.2% (+32.8)#85 13.7% (+36.3)#2,383
85. Barnsdall 50.0% 17.2% (+32.8)#86 13.7% (+36.3)#2,388
86. Ringling 50.0% 17.2% (+32.8)#87 13.7% (+36.3)#2,401
87. Kiowa 50.0% 17.2% (+32.8)#88 13.7% (+36.3)#2,414
88. Agra 50.0% 17.2% (+32.8)#89 13.7% (+36.3)#2,424
89. Keota 50.0% 17.2% (+32.8)#90 13.7% (+36.3)#2,431
90. Earlsboro 50.0% 17.2% (+32.8)#91 13.7% (+36.3)#2,438
91. Crowder 50.0% 17.2% (+32.8)#92 13.7% (+36.3)#2,455
92. Haworth 50.0% 17.2% (+32.8)#93 13.7% (+36.3)#2,473
93. Gotebo 50.0% 17.2% (+32.8)#94 13.7% (+36.3)#2,476
94. Lamont 50.0% 17.2% (+32.8)#95 13.7% (+36.3)#2,480
95. Foster 50.0% 17.2% (+32.8)#96 13.7% (+36.3)#2,483
96. Pittsburg 50.0% 17.2% (+32.8)#97 13.7% (+36.3)#2,496
97. Summit 50.0% 17.2% (+32.8)#98 13.7% (+36.3)#2,507
98. Tishomingo 48.1% 17.2% (+31.0)#99 13.7% (+34.4)#2,557
99. Mcalester 46.4% 17.2% (+29.2)#100 13.7% (+32.6)#2,629
100. Toppers 46.2% 17.2% (+29.0)#101 13.7% (+32.4)#2,641

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Oklahoma?
Grove has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the State of Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Oklahoma is 17.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the United States is 13.7%.