Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Father
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in North Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in North Carolina

City Single Father Poverty vs State vs National
1. Boone 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#1 13.7% (+86.3)#2
2. Etowah 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#2 13.7% (+86.3)#30
3. East Flat Rock 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#3 13.7% (+86.3)#53
4. Nashville 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#4 13.7% (+86.3)#61
5. Williamston 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#5 13.7% (+86.3)#72
6. Ayden 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#6 13.7% (+86.3)#78
7. Forest Oaks 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#7 13.7% (+86.3)#106
8. Surf City 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#8 13.7% (+86.3)#113
9. Louisburg 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#9 13.7% (+86.3)#164
10. South Rosemary 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#10 13.7% (+86.3)#176
11. Taylorsville 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#11 13.7% (+86.3)#248
12. Hertford 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#12 13.7% (+86.3)#260
13. Pinebluff 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#13 13.7% (+86.3)#297
14. Vander 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#14 13.7% (+86.3)#349
15. Princeton 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#15 13.7% (+86.3)#352
16. Cordova 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#16 13.7% (+86.3)#385
17. South Henderson 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#17 13.7% (+86.3)#425
18. Lucama 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#18 13.7% (+86.3)#460
19. Faison 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#19 13.7% (+86.3)#503
20. Richfield 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#20 13.7% (+86.3)#517
21. West Marion 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#21 13.7% (+86.3)#520
22. Gaston 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#22 13.7% (+86.3)#536
23. Clarkton 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#23 13.7% (+86.3)#548
24. Barker Ten Mile 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#24 13.7% (+86.3)#571
25. Hayesville 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#25 13.7% (+86.3)#646
26. Minnesott Beach 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#26 13.7% (+86.3)#736
27. Roxobel 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#27 13.7% (+86.3)#764
28. East Laurinburg 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#28 13.7% (+86.3)#861
29. Kelford 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#29 13.7% (+86.3)#904
30. Watha 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#30 13.7% (+86.3)#974
31. Marietta 100.0% 16.3% (+83.7)#31 13.7% (+86.3)#1,110
32. Tyro 83.3% 16.3% (+67.0)#32 13.7% (+69.6)#1,311
33. New London 83.3% 16.3% (+67.0)#33 13.7% (+69.6)#1,316
34. Hookerton 80.0% 16.3% (+63.7)#34 13.7% (+66.3)#1,378
35. Ahoskie 78.3% 16.3% (+61.9)#35 13.7% (+64.5)#1,417
36. Eden 75.7% 16.3% (+59.3)#36 13.7% (+61.9)#1,450
37. Elrod 71.4% 16.3% (+55.1)#37 13.7% (+57.7)#1,581
38. Morganton 70.6% 16.3% (+54.3)#38 13.7% (+56.9)#1,592
39. Kill Devil Hills 70.5% 16.3% (+54.1)#39 13.7% (+56.8)#1,598
40. Spencer 70.5% 16.3% (+54.1)#40 13.7% (+56.7)#1,599
41. Hildebran 68.8% 16.3% (+52.4)#41 13.7% (+55.0)#1,637
42. Kinston 67.9% 16.3% (+51.6)#42 13.7% (+54.2)#1,657
43. Hampstead 67.9% 16.3% (+51.5)#43 13.7% (+54.2)#1,658
44. Ronda 66.7% 16.3% (+50.3)#44 13.7% (+53.0)#1,713
45. Polkville 66.7% 16.3% (+50.3)#45 13.7% (+53.0)#1,715
46. Bostic 66.7% 16.3% (+50.3)#46 13.7% (+53.0)#1,733
47. Hamlet 65.5% 16.3% (+49.2)#47 13.7% (+51.8)#1,766
48. Beaufort 65.1% 16.3% (+48.8)#48 13.7% (+51.4)#1,775
49. Rosman 63.6% 16.3% (+47.3)#49 13.7% (+49.9)#1,817
50. Tarboro 62.9% 16.3% (+46.6)#50 13.7% (+49.2)#1,831
51. Lake Park 61.8% 16.3% (+45.4)#51 13.7% (+48.1)#1,868
52. North Wilkesboro 61.7% 16.3% (+45.4)#52 13.7% (+48.0)#1,869
53. Badin 61.5% 16.3% (+45.2)#53 13.7% (+47.8)#1,873
54. Kings Grant 61.2% 16.3% (+44.9)#54 13.7% (+47.5)#1,887
55. Whiteville 60.6% 16.3% (+44.3)#55 13.7% (+46.9)#1,910
56. Welcome 59.0% 16.3% (+42.7)#56 13.7% (+45.3)#1,984
57. Buies Creek 58.2% 16.3% (+41.9)#57 13.7% (+44.5)#2,021
58. Denton 57.1% 16.3% (+40.8)#58 13.7% (+43.4)#2,049
59. Laurinburg 54.7% 16.3% (+38.3)#59 13.7% (+41.0)#2,154
60. Clyde 54.5% 16.3% (+38.2)#60 13.7% (+40.8)#2,163
61. Mount Olive 54.2% 16.3% (+37.8)#61 13.7% (+40.5)#2,182
62. Butner 54.1% 16.3% (+37.7)#62 13.7% (+40.3)#2,187
63. Cherokee 53.5% 16.3% (+37.1)#63 13.7% (+39.8)#2,215
64. Elizabeth City 53.2% 16.3% (+36.9)#64 13.7% (+39.5)#2,230
65. Reidsville 51.4% 16.3% (+35.0)#65 13.7% (+37.6)#2,300
66. Elroy 50.8% 16.3% (+34.4)#66 13.7% (+37.1)#2,320
67. Woodfin 50.0% 16.3% (+33.7)#67 13.7% (+36.3)#2,335
68. Sandyfield 50.0% 16.3% (+33.7)#68 13.7% (+36.3)#2,418
69. Enfield 48.6% 16.3% (+32.2)#69 13.7% (+34.9)#2,546
70. Fairmont 47.8% 16.3% (+31.5)#70 13.7% (+34.1)#2,571
71. Spindale 47.1% 16.3% (+30.7)#71 13.7% (+33.3)#2,598
72. Sharpsburg 46.3% 16.3% (+29.9)#72 13.7% (+32.6)#2,634
73. Brogden 45.7% 16.3% (+29.4)#73 13.7% (+32.0)#2,660
74. Maxton 45.5% 16.3% (+29.1)#74 13.7% (+31.7)#2,668
75. Walnut Creek 45.5% 16.3% (+29.1)#75 13.7% (+31.7)#2,670
76. Youngsville 45.1% 16.3% (+28.8)#76 13.7% (+31.4)#2,688
77. Walnut Cove 45.0% 16.3% (+28.7)#77 13.7% (+31.3)#2,695
78. Elon 44.4% 16.3% (+28.1)#78 13.7% (+30.7)#2,709
79. Franklinville 44.4% 16.3% (+28.1)#79 13.7% (+30.7)#2,716
80. Elm City 44.4% 16.3% (+28.1)#80 13.7% (+30.7)#2,717
81. Pilot Mountain 43.3% 16.3% (+27.0)#81 13.7% (+29.6)#2,773
82. Seaboard 42.1% 16.3% (+25.8)#82 13.7% (+28.4)#2,853
83. Statesville 41.4% 16.3% (+25.0)#83 13.7% (+27.7)#2,890
84. Jefferson 40.8% 16.3% (+24.5)#84 13.7% (+27.1)#2,918
85. Spring Lake 37.9% 16.3% (+21.6)#85 13.7% (+24.2)#3,119
86. Rockingham 37.1% 16.3% (+20.8)#86 13.7% (+23.4)#3,173
87. Bryson City 36.4% 16.3% (+20.0)#87 13.7% (+22.7)#3,229
88. Wrightsboro 34.7% 16.3% (+18.4)#88 13.7% (+21.0)#3,355
89. Ruth 33.3% 16.3% (+17.0)#89 13.7% (+19.6)#3,503
90. Teachey 32.5% 16.3% (+16.2)#90 13.7% (+18.8)#3,595
91. Half Moon 32.1% 16.3% (+15.8)#91 13.7% (+18.4)#3,618
92. Havelock 31.7% 16.3% (+15.4)#92 13.7% (+18.0)#3,649
93. Burnsville 31.1% 16.3% (+14.8)#93 13.7% (+17.4)#3,692
94. Lumberton 30.9% 16.3% (+14.6)#94 13.7% (+17.2)#3,709
95. Shelby 30.8% 16.3% (+14.4)#95 13.7% (+17.1)#3,718
96. Granite Falls 30.8% 16.3% (+14.4)#96 13.7% (+17.1)#3,722
97. Cofield 30.4% 16.3% (+14.1)#97 13.7% (+16.7)#3,760
98. Hillsborough 30.3% 16.3% (+14.0)#98 13.7% (+16.6)#3,767
99. Marvin 30.0% 16.3% (+13.7)#99 13.7% (+16.3)#3,788
100. Kernersville 29.2% 16.3% (+12.9)#100 13.7% (+15.5)#3,867

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in North Carolina are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in North Carolina?
Boone has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in North Carolina with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the State of North Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in North Carolina is 16.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the United States is 13.7%.