Immigrants from China vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,426,374 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.187. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 2.5 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $56,872, a difference of 18.4%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $46,098, a difference of 17.7%), and median earnings ($56,638 compared to $48,836, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $58,162, a difference of 0.40%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $116,156, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 45.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 37.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.1%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 26.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 24.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 22.6%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.0%), currently married (47.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 84.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 46.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 8.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 31.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 74.9%), no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 74.0%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 40.2%), male disability (9.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 26.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 6.2%).