Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,020,133 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.382. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to an increase of 9.4 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,161 compared to $77,465, a difference of 17.1%), median family income ($108,288 compared to $116,188, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,471 compared to $116,156, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,930 compared to $58,162, a difference of 0.40%), median female earnings ($41,114 compared to $41,461, a difference of 0.84%), and median earnings ($48,266 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 31.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 31.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.76%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother poverty (26.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 51.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.5%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.3% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 0.28%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 0.47%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 75.0%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 22.4%), male disability (10.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.88%).