Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Philippines
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Philippines

Chinese

Average
Exceptional
6,107
SOCIAL INDEX
58.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
163rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Philippines Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,020,133 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.382. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to an increase of 9.4 Chinese.
Immigrants from Philippines Integration in Chinese Communities

Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,161 compared to $77,465, a difference of 17.1%), median family income ($108,288 compared to $116,188, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,471 compared to $116,156, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,930 compared to $58,162, a difference of 0.40%), median female earnings ($41,114 compared to $41,461, a difference of 0.84%), and median earnings ($48,266 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesChinese
Per Capita Income
Average
$44,000
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,288
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,899
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,266
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,809
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,114
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,930
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,910
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,471
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,161
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Average
25.9%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 31.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 31.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.76%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother poverty (26.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 7.5%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesChinese
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.6%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.0%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.5%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
9.8%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 51.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 10.6%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesChinese
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.7%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Poor
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Poor
8.9%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.99%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.1%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.1%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Exceptional
84.1%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.5%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.3% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 0.28%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesChinese
Family Households
Exceptional
68.3%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.0%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.6%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Excellent
30.2%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 0.47%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 0.47%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesChinese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.5%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.1%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.8%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 75.0%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesChinese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.6%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.2%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.8%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.8%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.7%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Poor
45.0%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.4%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.6%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 22.4%), male disability (10.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.88%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesChinese
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.2%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.8%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%