Immigrants from China vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,707,976 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Osage within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $84,461, a difference of 41.8%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $75,240, a difference of 40.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $88,390, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $55,677, a difference of 24.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $45,764, a difference of 26.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Osage communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 46.4%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 44.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 52.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.69%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 25.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 34.0%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 34.0%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.74%), currently married (47.9% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and family households (64.7% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 74.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Osage communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 86.1%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 81.9%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.20%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 89.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 66.6%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.0%).