Immigrants from Jordan vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,292,383 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.585. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 37.1 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $77,465, a difference of 22.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $58,162, a difference of 13.2%), and median household income ($89,412 compared to $98,496, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,673 compared to $48,836, a difference of 0.34%), median male earnings ($57,145 compared to $56,872, a difference of 0.48%), and median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $41,461, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 40.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 33.1%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.0%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 53.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.9%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 36.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 19.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.52%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.7%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.2%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.8%), male disability (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.84%).