Immigrants from China vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,292,030 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $96,667, a difference of 23.9%), median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $55,290, a difference of 21.8%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $45,047, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 10.9%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $61,177, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $50,923, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 32.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 28.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.39%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 56.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 24.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 28.3%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.5%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.010%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.16%), and family households (64.7% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 32.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.7%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.5%), and no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.27%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 30.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.060%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.0%).