Immigrants from China vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,101,351 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $60,305, a difference of 98.6%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $54,644, a difference of 92.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $65,113, a difference of 87.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 25.1%), median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $32,500, a difference of 44.5%), and median earnings ($56,638 compared to $36,876, a difference of 53.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 144.8%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 139.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 134.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 49.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 54.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 57.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 121.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 79.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 73.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 95.3%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 79.8%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.6%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 46.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 45.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 183.4%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 173.3%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 128.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.10%), 8th grade (95.0% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 102.8%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 84.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 79.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 13.0%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 21.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 27.3%).