Immigrants from China vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
White/Caucasian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Whites/Caucasians
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,140
SOCIAL INDEX
48.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
185th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
White/Caucasian Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,130,444 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.637. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.692% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 691.6 Whites/Caucasians.
Immigrants from China vs White/Caucasian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $91,668, a difference of 30.6%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $42,180, a difference of 28.6%), and median household income ($105,335 compared to $82,029, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.9%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $50,336, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $58,847, a difference of 17.5%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | White/Caucasian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Poor $42,180 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Poor $99,800 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Poor $82,029 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Poor $45,197 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Fair $53,925 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Tragic $37,531 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Tragic $50,336 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Poor $91,668 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Fair $98,091 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Tragic $58,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Tragic 28.5% |
Immigrants from China vs White/Caucasian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 33.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 30.9%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | White/Caucasian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Poor 18.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Average 16.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Average 16.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 18.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Excellent 11.1% |
Immigrants from China vs White/Caucasian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 34.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 29.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | White/Caucasian |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Poor 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 8.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.3% |
Immigrants from China vs White/Caucasian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 32.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | White/Caucasian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 78.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Exceptional 41.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
Immigrants from China vs White/Caucasian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 34.8%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.5%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.010%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and family households (64.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.58%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | White/Caucasian |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 65.1% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants from China vs White/Caucasian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 115.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 24.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 9.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 18.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | White/Caucasian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 7.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Exceptional 93.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 60.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from China vs White/Caucasian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 75.8%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 65.1%), and no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.60%), ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and high school diploma (89.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.86%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | White/Caucasian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Exceptional 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Exceptional 90.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Good 86.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Poor 64.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 57.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Tragic 44.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 35.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from China vs White/Caucasian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 72.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 45.1%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.7%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | White/Caucasian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 13.0% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Average 47.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |