Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Cuba
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Cuba
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,627
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
214th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Cuba Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,437,078 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.421. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 4.3 Immigrants from Cuba.
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Cuba Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($125,540 compared to $78,249, a difference of 60.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $76,701, a difference of 56.1%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $34,910, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $50,374, a difference of 15.0%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $33,291, a difference of 41.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Cuba |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Tragic $34,910 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Tragic $78,249 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Tragic $68,461 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Tragic $38,426 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Tragic $43,461 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Tragic $33,291 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Tragic $50,374 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Tragic $76,701 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Tragic $80,662 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Tragic $44,735 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Cuba Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 117.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 56.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.2%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and single mother poverty (26.1% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 15.2%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Cuba |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.6% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 11.3% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 19.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 18.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 18.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Fair 21.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Average 16.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Tragic 30.1% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 7.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 17.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 19.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 20.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Cuba Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 21.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 5.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Cuba |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Cuba Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.61%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Cuba |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Tragic 72.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Exceptional 83.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Cuba Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 68.0%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 51.7%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (64.7% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 5.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Cuba |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 68.2% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 26.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 44.2% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 43.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 41.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Cuba Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 74.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Cuba |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Exceptional 91.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Average 55.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Poor 18.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Cuba Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 162.4%), master's degree (21.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 95.1%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 87.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.32%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Cuba |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 96.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 96.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 95.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 93.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 93.2% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 92.2% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 88.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 87.5% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 83.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 80.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Tragic 55.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 50.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Tragic 39.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 30.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 10.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Tragic 1.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Cuba Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 35.4%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.5%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Cuba |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Fair 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Fair 47.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |