Arapaho vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,990,930 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 22.2 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $116,156, a difference of 52.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $104,264, a difference of 45.4%), and median household income ($67,965 compared to $98,496, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 10.4%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $77,465, a difference of 30.4%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $41,461, a difference of 31.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 99.7%), family poverty (12.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 94.5%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 80.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 35.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 39.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 40.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 179.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 152.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 151.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 31.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 55.8%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.2%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (66.5% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.34, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.25%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.93%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 55.2%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 51.3%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 46.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 29.4%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.88%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.9%).