Immigrants from China vs Slavic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,086,069 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.043. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Slavs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $96,377, a difference of 24.3%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $86,398, a difference of 21.9%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $45,049, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.8%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $61,709, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $50,563, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 24.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 18.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 29.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 28.1%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.8%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (64.7% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 69.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 7.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 62.2%), no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 55.3%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 0.86%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 46.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 35.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.38%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.7%).