Immigrants from China vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
298th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,397,428 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Trinidadians and Tobagonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Trinidadians and Tobagonians.
Immigrants from China vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 38.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $91,357, a difference of 33.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $89,856, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $52,631, a difference of 10.1%), median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $40,958, a difference of 14.7%), and median earnings ($56,638 compared to $45,820, a difference of 23.6%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Tragic $41,655 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Tragic $94,466 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Tragic $80,402 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Fair $45,820 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Tragic $51,446 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Exceptional $40,958 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Good $52,631 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Tragic $89,856 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Tragic $91,357 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Tragic $55,327 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 67.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 44.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.7%), single mother poverty (26.1% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and single father poverty (14.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 14.1%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.3% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.9% |
| Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
| Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.4% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Good 19.8% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 19.3% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 19.2% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 19.3% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 19.3% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Fair 13.0% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Fair 21.2% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 17.0% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Fair 29.6% |
| Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 14.2% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 15.9% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 28.7%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.5%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
| Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.7% |
| Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
| Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Tragic 14.6% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Tragic 22.6% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.8% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 5.2% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.3% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.3% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
| Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Poor 9.1% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Average 65.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 79.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Tragic 30.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Tragic 71.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 83.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Poor 84.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Good 84.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
Immigrants from China vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 52.4%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 47.8%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.0%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Tragic 63.6% |
| Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 26.4% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 40.9% |
| Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.32 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.7% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 41.5% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Poor 12.2% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 36.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 56.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 41.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 11.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 26.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 33.7%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 23.7% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Tragic 76.3% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 40.9% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 13.6% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Tragic 4.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 102.0%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 68.4%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.4% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.2% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.9% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 96.7% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 96.2% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 95.2% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 94.7% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 93.7% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 92.4% |
| 11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.1% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 89.4% |
| High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 86.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 83.0% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Tragic 61.1% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 55.8% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Tragic 43.6% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 35.7% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Fair 14.4% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 4.0% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 30.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 3.0%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.6%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Average 11.7% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 11.0% |
| Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Fair 12.3% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Poor 5.7% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 6.0% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Average 11.4% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Poor 23.9% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Fair 47.7% |
| Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.2% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.5% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 17.9% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |