Immigrants from China vs Cambodian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,735,451 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.154. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Cambodians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $107,148, a difference of 11.8%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $96,324, a difference of 9.3%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $62,516, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $66,892, a difference of 3.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $55,571, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and single father poverty (14.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 18.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.5%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 39.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.9%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.2%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (66.4% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 0.50%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.70%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 20.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.47%), ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.5%).