Immigrants from China vs Ethiopian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,499,702 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.568. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 12.7 Ethiopians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $96,824, a difference of 23.7%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 22.2%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $56,243, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $64,989, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $53,818, a difference of 7.6%), and median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $43,243, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 23.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 22.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.040%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 22.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.4%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 28.3%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.26%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and family households (64.7% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 44.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.4%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.6%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and 8th grade (95.0% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.1%), disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.8%).