Central American vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Central American
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Central Americans
Chinese
1,952
SOCIAL INDEX
17.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
278th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Central American Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,020,514 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Chinese.
Central American vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,321 compared to $77,465, a difference of 37.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $116,156, a difference of 27.7%), and median family income ($91,087 compared to $116,188, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $58,162, a difference of 10.5%), wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and median female earnings ($36,492 compared to $41,461, a difference of 13.6%).
Income Metric | Central American | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,560 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,087 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $78,803 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,280 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,093 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,492 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,626 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $85,144 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,951 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,321 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.1% | Average 25.9% |
Central American vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 84.8%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 72.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 69.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.6%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 19.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 23.1%).
Poverty Metric | Central American | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 16.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.9% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.6% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Poor 13.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.0% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Excellent 16.0% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.8% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Central American vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 48.5%), female unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 32.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.6%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Central American | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.8% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Central American vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Central American | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.7% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Central American vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 47.3%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 44.7%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.41 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.2%), family households (66.0% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Central American | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.0% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.1% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.9% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.41 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.3% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Excellent 30.2% |
Central American vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 31.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 24.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 16.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Central American | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Fair 10.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.2% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.5% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Central American vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 130.6%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 24.5%), and associate's degree (39.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Education Level Metric | Central American | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 92.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.6% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 90.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 88.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 86.9% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 85.2% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.5% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 79.2% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.7% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.1% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.2% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Central American vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.18%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.2%).
Disability Metric | Central American | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.1% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.8% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |