Immigrants from China vs Yup'ik Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yup'ik
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from China

Yup'ik

Good
Fair
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,388
SOCIAL INDEX
21.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
262nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yup'ik Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,870,788 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.686. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.152% in Yup'ik. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 152.2 Yup'ik.
Immigrants from China Integration in Yup'ik Communities

Immigrants from China vs Yup'ik Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $30,518, a difference of 77.8%), median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $39,504, a difference of 70.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $73,688, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $54,732, a difference of 5.9%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $60,727, a difference of 13.9%).
Immigrants from China vs Yup'ik Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChinaYup'ik
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,264
Tragic
$30,518
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,540
Tragic
$79,290
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$105,335
Tragic
$69,695
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$56,638
Tragic
$35,942
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$67,353
Tragic
$39,504
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,972
Tragic
$32,730
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,931
Exceptional
$54,732
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$119,756
Tragic
$73,688
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$122,178
Tragic
$81,000
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$69,174
Average
$60,727
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.7%
Exceptional
24.7%

Immigrants from China vs Yup'ik Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 241.7%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 178.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 170.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 19.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 22.4%), and single mother poverty (26.1% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 24.3%).
Immigrants from China vs Yup'ik Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChinaYup'ik
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
20.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
18.7%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
21.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.2%
Tragic
27.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
24.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
27.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
25.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
24.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
25.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.1%
Tragic
26.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
32.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.1%
Tragic
32.5%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.5%
Tragic
14.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
15.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
32.7%

Immigrants from China vs Yup'ik Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 260.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 238.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 227.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 64.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 74.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 75.2%).
Immigrants from China vs Yup'ik Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChinaYup'ik
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
13.6%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
16.4%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
10.9%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Tragic
23.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.5%
Tragic
41.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
17.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
18.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
9.5%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
9.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
21.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
18.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
11.0%

Immigrants from China vs Yup'ik Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 70.9%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 5.8%).
Immigrants from China vs Yup'ik Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChinaYup'ik
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Tragic
62.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
73.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.1%
Tragic
33.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.1%
Tragic
70.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Tragic
73.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
76.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
78.6%

Immigrants from China vs Yup'ik Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 191.6%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 128.7%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 97.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.4%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and family households (64.7% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 11.9%).
Immigrants from China vs Yup'ik Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChinaYup'ik
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Exceptional
72.4%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
37.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
44.1%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
4.00
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
10.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
39.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
56.4%

Immigrants from China vs Yup'ik Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 202.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 47.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 22.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 45.3%).
Immigrants from China vs Yup'ik Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChinaYup'ik
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
45.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.9%
Tragic
58.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Tragic
34.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
14.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from China vs Yup'ik Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (48.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 149.4%), master's degree (21.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 147.8%), and doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 136.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.44%), 9th grade (94.3% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from China vs Yup'ik Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChinaYup'ik
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.2%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
99.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
99.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
99.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
99.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
99.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
87.6%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
86.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
80.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.9%
Tragic
45.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
39.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.5%
Tragic
25.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
19.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
21.2%
Tragic
8.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.1%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from China vs Yup'ik Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 370.0%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 122.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 94.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.39%), ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.9%).
Immigrants from China vs Yup'ik Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChinaYup'ik
Disability
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.96%
Tragic
4.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.3%
Tragic
37.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Tragic
61.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.7%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%