Immigrants from Dominican Republic vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,262,422 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Dominican Republic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Dominican Republic within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Dominican Republic corresponds to an increase of 24.4 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($45,758 compared to $77,465, a difference of 69.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,836 compared to $116,156, a difference of 47.3%), and median family income ($81,233 compared to $116,188, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,857 compared to $41,461, a difference of 12.5%), householder income under 25 years ($50,204 compared to $58,162, a difference of 15.9%), and median earnings ($41,554 compared to $48,836, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 130.3%), receiving food stamps (22.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 126.5%), and family poverty (14.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 121.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 19.6%), single male poverty (14.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 34.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 35.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (7.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 61.0%), unemployment (7.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 58.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 58.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 30.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 24.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 84.1%), married-couple households (37.3% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 34.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.35 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.41%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and family households (63.3% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (31.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 282.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 171.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 129.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (68.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 33.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (33.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 80.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 129.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 130.8%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 38.0%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 50.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 37.0%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.0%).