Yaqui vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Yaqui
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Yaqui
Chinese
1,558
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
299th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Yaqui Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,628,880 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Yaqui communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.678. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yaqui within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.573% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yaqui corresponds to an increase of 1,573.3 Chinese.

Yaqui vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,417 compared to $77,465, a difference of 37.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,914 compared to $116,156, a difference of 33.6%), and median family income ($87,289 compared to $116,188, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 7.7%), median female earnings ($34,943 compared to $41,461, a difference of 18.6%), and median earnings ($40,647 compared to $48,836, a difference of 20.2%).

Income Metric | Yaqui | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,112 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $87,289 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,596 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,647 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,777 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,943 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $48,300 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $81,656 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,914 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,417 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.0% | Average 25.9% |
Yaqui vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (20.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 74.4%), family poverty (11.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 74.3%), and married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 73.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (14.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 29.7%), and single mother poverty (33.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 34.6%).

Poverty Metric | Yaqui | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.3% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.3% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 24.9% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.1% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Yaqui vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 59.4%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 33.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 11.3%).

Unemployment Metric | Yaqui | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.6% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Yaqui vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

Labor Participation Metric | Yaqui | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.0% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.5% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 37.1% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.5% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.2% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.4% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.5% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.9% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Yaqui vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 61.8%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 44.0%), and births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.47%), family households (65.6% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 12.0%).

Family Structure Metric | Yaqui | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.6% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.1% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.5% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.4% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.8% | Excellent 30.2% |
Yaqui vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.77%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

Vehicle Availability Metric | Yaqui | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.5% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.3% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.9% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Yaqui vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 65.0%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.4%), and bachelor's degree (29.0% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.98%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

Education Level Metric | Yaqui | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.6% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.5% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.5% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.5% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.2% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.2% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.6% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.0% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Yaqui vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yaqui and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 30.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

Disability Metric | Yaqui | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |