Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,604,520 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to a decrease of 24.9 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,864 compared to $116,156, a difference of 32.2%), median household income ($75,574 compared to $98,496, a difference of 30.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $104,264, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 5.9%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $58,162, a difference of 14.7%), and median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $41,461, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (18.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 54.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 51.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 20.7%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 23.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 49.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 34.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 33.2%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.1%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.60%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and family households (64.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.0%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.9%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 25.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.9%).