Immigrants from Netherlands vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,816,353 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Netherlands communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Netherlands within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.288% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Netherlands corresponds to an increase of 287.6 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,463 compared to $77,465, a difference of 16.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,592 compared to $58,162, a difference of 10.6%), and wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,082 compared to $104,264, a difference of 0.78%), median female earnings ($41,870 compared to $41,461, a difference of 0.99%), and median family income ($114,987 compared to $116,188, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 26.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 24.0%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.6%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 37.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.5%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and family households (63.8% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.0%), currently married (48.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 33.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 16.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 40.5%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.0%), and master's degree (18.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.21%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Netherlands and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 24.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.1%).