Moroccan vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Moroccan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Moroccans

Chinese

Fair
Exceptional
3,626
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
215th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Moroccan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,193,651 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Moroccan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.366. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Moroccans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.099% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Moroccans corresponds to an increase of 99.1 Chinese.
Moroccan Integration in Chinese Communities

Moroccan vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,683 compared to $77,465, a difference of 29.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,138 compared to $116,156, a difference of 16.0%), and median household income ($86,468 compared to $98,496, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,838 compared to $48,836, a difference of 0.010%), per capita income ($45,854 compared to $46,098, a difference of 0.53%), and median male earnings ($56,499 compared to $56,872, a difference of 0.66%).
Moroccan vs Chinese Income
Income MetricMoroccanChinese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,854
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Good
$104,488
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Good
$86,468
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,838
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,499
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,872
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,256
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,117
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$100,138
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$59,683
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.0%
Average
25.9%

Moroccan vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 55.5%), family poverty (9.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 50.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 10.3%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.4%), and single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 19.8%).
Moroccan vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricMoroccanChinese
Poverty
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Fair
12.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.5%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.8%

Moroccan vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 32.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.2%).
Moroccan vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMoroccanChinese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.9%

Moroccan vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.0%).
Moroccan vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMoroccanChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.7%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.6%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Poor
82.5%
Exceptional
84.1%

Moroccan vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.5%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.6%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 5.1%).
Moroccan vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMoroccanChinese
Family Households
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Average
3.22
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.8%
Excellent
30.2%

Moroccan vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 80.1%), no vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 78.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 23.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 50.3%).
Moroccan vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMoroccanChinese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
85.4%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
48.8%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
8.8%

Moroccan vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.7%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.2% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.70%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.78%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.78%).
Moroccan vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricMoroccanChinese
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Poor
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.8%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.2%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
48.2%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.5%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Fair
1.8%

Moroccan vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.4%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.2%), female disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.7%).
Moroccan vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricMoroccanChinese
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Good
12.1%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.2%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%