Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,299,134 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.560. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.132% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 132.3 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $77,051, a difference of 11.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $135,508, a difference of 10.9%), and median household income ($105,335 compared to $116,460, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $59,424, a difference of 2.6%), median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $49,256, a difference of 4.9%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $57,742, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 30.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 23.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 9.1%), single mother poverty (26.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 10.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.35%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (48.4% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 8.3%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.35%), single father households (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 96.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 24.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 8.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.3%), master's degree (21.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and bachelor's degree (48.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.8%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.7%).