Aleut vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,293,519 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Aleut communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Aleuts within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Aleuts corresponds to an increase of 14.1 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,708 compared to $77,465, a difference of 23.5%), median household income ($83,446 compared to $98,496, a difference of 18.0%), and median family income ($98,702 compared to $116,188, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,719 compared to $41,461, a difference of 7.1%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and per capita income ($42,210 compared to $46,098, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (25.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 57.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 55.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 6.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 23.1%), and receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 73.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 69.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 54.4%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.2%), and births to unmarried women (39.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.4%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 58.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 23.5%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and bachelor's degree (31.3% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and 7th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 34.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 31.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.1%), female disability (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.1%).