New Zealander vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
New Zealander
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
New Zealanders
Chinese
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in New Zealander Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,398,916 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.497. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.099% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to a decrease of 99.4 Chinese.
New Zealander vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $77,465, a difference of 15.0%), per capita income ($50,575 compared to $46,098, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $58,162, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $104,264, a difference of 0.79%), median family income ($115,230 compared to $116,188, a difference of 0.83%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $41,461, a difference of 2.4%).
Income Metric | New Zealander | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,575 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,230 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,146 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,246 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,199 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,446 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,294 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,085 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,286 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,333 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Average 25.9% |
New Zealander vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 34.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 32.5%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.5%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 18.2%).
Poverty Metric | New Zealander | Chinese |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Excellent 10.8% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.6% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.6% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Poor 13.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.1% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.8% |
New Zealander vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 37.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.98%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Unemployment Metric | New Zealander | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
New Zealander vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | New Zealander | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.6% | Exceptional 84.1% |
New Zealander vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.8%), family households (62.9% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.34%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 4.5%).
Family Structure Metric | New Zealander | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 62.9% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.2% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Excellent 30.2% |
New Zealander vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 36.4%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 17.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | New Zealander | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.4% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 8.8% |
New Zealander vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 41.9%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 33.5%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.15%).
Education Level Metric | New Zealander | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.8% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.2% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.8% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.3% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.5% | Fair 1.8% |
New Zealander vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.1%).
Disability Metric | New Zealander | Chinese |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.4% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |