Panamanian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,496,716 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Panamanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.190. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Panamanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Panamanians corresponds to an increase of 24.7 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,266 compared to $77,465, a difference of 33.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,066 compared to $116,156, a difference of 20.9%), and median household income ($82,272 compared to $98,496, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $41,461, a difference of 6.2%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($45,593 compared to $48,836, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 52.6%), family poverty (9.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 51.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 6.6%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 54.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.0%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 37.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.7%), family households (64.8% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 52.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 46.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.9%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and associate's degree (45.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.9%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 22.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.56%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.96%), and disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%).