Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Ethiopia
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,168
SOCIAL INDEX
69.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
129th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,501,461 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.480. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Ethiopia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 9.9 Immigrants from Ethiopia.
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $95,256, a difference of 25.7%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 23.7%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $55,434, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $65,238, a difference of 6.0%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $53,408, a difference of 8.5%), and median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $42,744, a difference of 9.9%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Exceptional $45,923 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Excellent $106,969 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Exceptional $88,687 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Exceptional $48,924 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Good $55,434 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Exceptional $42,744 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Exceptional $53,408 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Average $95,256 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Good $102,763 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Exceptional $65,238 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Exceptional 21.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 23.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 23.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.29%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Average 12.2% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Good 8.9% |
| Males | Excellent 10.7% | Average 11.2% |
| Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Good 13.3% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Fair 20.2% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Excellent 16.6% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Average 16.4% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Average 16.4% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Average 16.6% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Exceptional 27.7% |
| Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Good 10.7% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.95%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
| Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Females | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
| Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Excellent 11.3% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Fair 17.8% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.0% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 4.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Excellent 4.8% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Fair 8.8% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Excellent 8.8% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 69.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Exceptional 69.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Exceptional 82.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Exceptional 38.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Exceptional 77.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Exceptional 86.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 86.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 85.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.0%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 30.7%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.68%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (64.7% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 5.7%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Tragic 61.2% |
| Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 27.8% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 43.1% |
| Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Poor 2.4% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Poor 6.6% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 44.5% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Average 12.1% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Exceptional 29.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 45.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 53.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Average 10.4% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Average 89.6% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 53.0% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 17.9% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.2%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.0%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and 8th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.5% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 96.8% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 96.5% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 95.3% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 95.0% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 94.3% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 93.1% |
| 11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Poor 92.1% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Fair 90.9% |
| High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Fair 88.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Good 86.0% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Exceptional 68.0% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 62.6% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Exceptional 50.1% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 42.5% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.88%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Excellent 22.7% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Excellent 46.8% |
| Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 17.9% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |