Sri Lankan vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,549,331 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Sri Lankan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sri Lankans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sri Lankans corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,201 compared to $77,465, a difference of 20.7%), median family income ($108,234 compared to $116,188, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,270 compared to $116,156, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 0.33%), median male earnings ($56,136 compared to $56,872, a difference of 1.3%), and median earnings ($48,040 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 39.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 36.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother poverty (26.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 39.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and family households with children (29.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.35 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.35%), family households (67.7% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.65%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 107.0%), ged/equivalency (84.0% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (38.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.77%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.8%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.30%), disability age over 75 (48.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.1%).