Immigrants from China vs German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,062,689 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Germans within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 19.0 Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and German communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $93,531, a difference of 28.0%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $83,358, a difference of 26.4%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $43,067, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 9.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $50,804, a difference of 14.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $59,730, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and German communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 28.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 27.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.3%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and German communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 31.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 28.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 41.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and German communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 29.6%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.8%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and German communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 127.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 24.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 10.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 19.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and German communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 89.0%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 73.1%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 64.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and German communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 78.7%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.070%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.1%).