Immigrants from China vs Bermudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,499,240 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bermudans within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Bermudans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to an increase of 0.3 Bermudans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $88,231, a difference of 35.7%), median household income ($105,335 compared to $80,406, a difference of 31.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,178 compared to $94,197, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 15.4%), householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $58,171, a difference of 18.9%), and median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $39,418, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 41.2%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 35.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 39.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 36.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 44.0%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 43.9%), and divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.96%), family households (64.7% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 18.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 67.4%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 54.3%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 42.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.8%).