Immigrants from China vs Turkish Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Turkish
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Turks
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Turkish Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 262,128,946 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Turks within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 3.3 Turks.
Immigrants from China vs Turkish Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $110,318, a difference of 8.6%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $54,266, a difference of 6.8%), and median household income ($105,335 compared to $99,389, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $68,037, a difference of 1.7%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $52,391, a difference of 3.6%), and median family income ($125,540 compared to $121,202, a difference of 3.6%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Turkish |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Exceptional $52,391 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Exceptional $121,202 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Exceptional $99,389 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Exceptional $53,919 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Exceptional $64,253 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Exceptional $44,695 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Exceptional $54,266 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Exceptional $110,318 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Exceptional $117,814 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Exceptional $68,037 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Tragic 27.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Turkish Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.090%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.85%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Turkish |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 13.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Exceptional 18.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Exceptional 26.4% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Turkish Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.85%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Turkish |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Average 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Turkish Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.74%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Turkish |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Tragic 35.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Tragic 73.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Turkish Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.5%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.060%), currently married (47.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Turkish |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Tragic 63.6% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Turkish Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 29.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 4.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Turkish |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 11.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Tragic 88.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Poor 54.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 18.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Turkish Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.4%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (70.9% compared to 70.7%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.79%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.80%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Turkish |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Exceptional 91.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Exceptional 88.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Exceptional 70.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 65.5% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Turkish Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Turkish |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Exceptional 21.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |