Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Sweden Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Sweden
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Sweden
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,195
SOCIAL INDEX
89.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
28th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Sweden Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,438,221 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Sweden. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Immigrants from Sweden.
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Sweden Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $53,621, a difference of 8.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $112,010, a difference of 6.9%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $69,722, a difference of 0.79%), median family income ($125,540 compared to $122,765, a difference of 2.3%), and per capita income ($54,264 compared to $55,582, a difference of 2.4%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Sweden |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Exceptional $55,582 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Exceptional $122,765 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Exceptional $100,699 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Exceptional $54,478 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Exceptional $65,406 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Exceptional $44,774 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Exceptional $53,621 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Exceptional $112,010 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Exceptional $118,318 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Exceptional $69,722 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Tragic 28.1% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Sweden Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.6%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Sweden |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Exceptional 27.5% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Sweden Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.70%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Sweden |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Sweden Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.89%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Sweden |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Good 65.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Good 79.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Poor 35.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Tragic 74.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Good 82.9% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Sweden Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.7%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 15.6%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.080%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Sweden |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Tragic 62.5% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 26.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Excellent 47.2% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Sweden Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 39.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Sweden |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Fair 10.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Fair 89.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Average 55.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Fair 19.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Sweden Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 47.1%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.8%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.45%), college, 1 year or more (66.4% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.87%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Sweden |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Exceptional 92.8% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Exceptional 88.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Exceptional 72.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 66.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Exceptional 54.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 47.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Exceptional 2.9% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Sweden Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.6%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.6%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.6%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Sweden |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Exceptional 21.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Average 3.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |