Tohono O'odham vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Chinese
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,007,357 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.962. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 11.3 Chinese.
Tohono O'odham vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($72,193 compared to $116,188, a difference of 60.9%), median household income ($61,663 compared to $98,496, a difference of 59.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $77,465, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 17.0%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $41,461, a difference of 24.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $58,162, a difference of 28.5%).
Income Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,256 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $72,193 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $61,663 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,349 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $39,543 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,205 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,248 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $69,068 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,774 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,121 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.1% | Average 25.9% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 213.5%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 207.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 166.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 42.9%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 74.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 91.9%).
Poverty Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 24.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 29.5% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 31.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 34.2% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.0% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 111.5%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 106.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 98.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 28.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 23.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 12.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.2% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 70.4% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.3% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 68.6% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 77.5% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 77.7% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.1% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 93.8%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 76.9%), and births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 64.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.53 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.8%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 37.9% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.53 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 36.8% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 49.8% | Excellent 30.2% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 90.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 33.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 8.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 26.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.0% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 57.5%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.0%), and professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.70%).
Education Level Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.6% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 52.8% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 47.1% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 31.8% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.4% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.7% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.8% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 91.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 66.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 13.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 16.4%).
Disability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 36.0% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.7% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.6% |