Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Laos
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Laos
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Laos Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 191,410,451 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.329. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 2.6 Immigrants from Laos.
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Laos Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $37,857, a difference of 43.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $85,553, a difference of 40.0%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $49,190, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 12.0%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $50,041, a difference of 15.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $56,722, a difference of 22.0%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Laos |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Tragic $37,857 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Tragic $92,239 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Tragic $78,327 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Tragic $42,884 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Tragic $49,190 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Tragic $36,841 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Tragic $50,041 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Tragic $85,553 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Tragic $90,909 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Tragic $56,722 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Exceptional 23.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 44.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 42.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.81%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Laos |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.2% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 20.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 19.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 18.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 18.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 22.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Tragic 30.6% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Laos |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Excellent 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Fair 5.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 30.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.96%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Laos |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Exceptional 40.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 81.6% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 54.9%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 51.4%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.94%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 6.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Laos |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 45.1% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 34.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 85.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 8.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 22.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Laos |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Exceptional 91.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 22.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 124.3%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 107.4%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 86.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.61%), 1st grade (97.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.62%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Laos |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 96.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 96.7% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 95.7% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 94.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 94.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 93.2% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 91.9% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 90.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 88.9% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 86.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 82.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Tragic 61.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 54.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 31.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 49.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 32.7%), and disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 6.2%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.7%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Laos |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Tragic 26.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 49.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |